Workflow
整体论
icon
Search documents
陈春花:今天需要新的认知模式
Jing Ji Guan Cha Bao· 2025-07-02 07:55
Group 1 - The article discusses the need for a new worldview in the context of the transition from the industrial society to the information society, emphasizing that traditional perspectives may no longer suffice [1][3][9] - It highlights the impact of digital technology and emerging phenomena on our understanding of the world, suggesting that the binary cognitive model rooted in industrial society is becoming inadequate [9][15] - The article references three significant works: "Oppenheimer," "Napoleon," and "Blossoms," which reflect the complexities and challenges of the current era, urging a reevaluation of personal and collective values [1][2][15] Group 2 - The binary cognitive model, as established by René Descartes, is identified as a foundational philosophy of the industrial society, promoting a separation between material and spiritual realms [4][5][8] - Descartes' contributions to modern thought include the idea that understanding the whole can be achieved by analyzing its parts, a method that has guided research and practical applications for centuries [6][7][8] - The limitations of the binary model are discussed, including the blurring of boundaries and the inadequacy of using parts to understand the whole in contemporary contexts [11][12][13] Group 3 - The article advocates for embracing a new worldview that recognizes the whole as greater than the sum of its parts, reflecting the complexities of modern society and the limitations of traditional perspectives [15][16] - It emphasizes the importance of adopting a more holistic and inclusive approach to understanding the world, moving beyond self-centered viewpoints to better navigate the challenges of the digital age [15][16] - The discussion includes the redefinition of boundaries between subjective and objective realities, material and spiritual aspects, and life and non-life, highlighting the evolving nature of these concepts in the current landscape [16]
陈春花:认知知识
Jing Ji Guan Cha Bao· 2025-06-12 01:34
Group 1 - The core idea emphasizes the need to transition from dualistic thinking to holistic thinking, recognizing that the value of the whole often exceeds the sum of its parts [1] - Traditional industries have made significant progress through the transformation of knowledge and information over the past 50 years, indicating that knowledge as a fundamental resource can create new value and business models [1] - Knowledge-driven enterprises, particularly digital-native companies and traditional firms excelling in digital transformation, are experiencing rapid growth despite many companies facing stagnation [1] Group 2 - The concept of symbiosis arises from the new space created by knowledge, highlighting that knowledge and creativity are significant sources of productivity [2] - The exploration of knowledge has been a fundamental question since ancient times, with Socrates questioning the essence of knowledge [3] - Various philosophical perspectives on knowledge have evolved, including the idea that knowledge is a belief, an objective fact, or a dynamic cognition based on action [7][10][12] Group 3 - The understanding of knowledge involves recognizing the relationship between objective facts and subjective cognition, emphasizing the role of experience [19] - Knowledge is defined as a dynamic process that involves the transformation of cognition and action, which is crucial for effective practice [19] - The integration of knowledge and action is essential, as true knowledge must manifest in practice to be considered valid [21]