聚力抓好日常监督。把握监督重点，紧盯权力集中、资金密集、资源富集的部门和岗位，突出重点领域 和重大项目，实施全周期管理，抓住预算审批、项目执行、验收管理等关键环节加强全流程管控。汇聚 监督合力，就中国农业电影电视中心而言，建立中心纪委委员、支部纪检委员、基层廉政监督员组成的 监督网络，发挥纪检委员、廉政监督员"前哨""探头"作用，开辟问题直报通道，推动干部责任落实，整 合相关职能部门力量，开展联合督查，形成以上率下、层层传导、级级落实的工作格局。抓好整改落 实，用好典型案例活教材，深入开展以案促改促治，结合案件暴露问题，下发纪检监察建议书，督促自 查自纠，深入查思想根源、制度漏洞、监管缺失、作风病灶、整改成效，推动建章立制。发动群众参与 监督，坚持纪委书记"开门办公"、纪检部门"上门服务"，主动听取情况反映，上前一步做好工作。 压紧压实主体责任。责任不实，监督必虚，要牢牢牵住责任落实这个"牛鼻子"，切实打通全面从严治 党"最后一公里"。协助党委制定主体责任清单，研究制定纪委监督工作清单，建立领导班子成员基层党 建联系点，推动责任落实。结合编制廉政风险防控手册，全面梳理工作运行流程图、问题图、措施图， 把监管责 ...

Group 1 - The article emphasizes the importance of unifying strict management supervision and encouraging responsibility among party members to foster a positive political environment for development and reform [3][4][12] - It highlights that a good political ecology is essential for party members to effectively engage in their work, and that overcoming challenges requires courage and innovative thinking [4][5] - The article discusses the need for the supervisory body to adapt to new tasks and responsibilities, ensuring that supervision is comprehensive and effective across various departments [6][11] Group 2 - The article outlines the role of political supervision in supporting responsible actions, focusing on political loyalty, safety, and accountability [7][10] - It stresses the importance of daily supervision and clear behavioral standards for party members, promoting a culture of compliance and proactive engagement [8][9] - The article calls for a balance between strict enforcement of regulations and supportive measures for those who take initiative, aiming to create an environment that encourages practical action and accountability [9][12]

Group 1 - The core viewpoint emphasizes the need for strengthening the responsibility and supervision of comprehensive strict governance of the Party, with a focus on the roles of the Party committee and the discipline inspection commission [1] - The Anhui Provincial State-owned Capital Operation Holding Group Co., Ltd. has implemented specialized supervision to ensure high-quality development through political, daily, and special supervision [1][2] Group 2 - Political supervision is prioritized to ensure the effective implementation of the "two responsibilities," focusing on the significance of deepening reforms and ensuring accountability within the Party [1] - Daily supervision is enhanced by revising internal supervision systems and establishing a comprehensive network to ensure that all levels of management are held accountable for both business and ethical conduct [2] - Special supervision is utilized to address serious violations, with a focus on key areas and personnel, ensuring that corrective actions are taken based on audit and inspection feedback [3]

Core Viewpoint - The establishment of a hierarchical and regular conversation and inquiry mechanism by the disciplinary inspection and supervision authorities is an effective exploration to integrate political supervision with daily supervision, ensuring that supervision is embedded in daily operations and conducted regularly [1][2]. Group 1: Mechanism and Implementation - The mechanism involves regular conversations and inquiries from higher-level disciplinary secretaries to lower-level secretaries to understand the implementation of decisions, major matters, and the integrity of key personnel, particularly the "top leader" [1]. - The approach emphasizes the importance of political responsibility and daily supervision, particularly focusing on the "top leader" to enhance political awareness and clarify responsibilities [1][2]. Group 2: Focus Areas - The focus of conversations and inquiries is on weak points in supervision and potential corruption risks, particularly regarding the implementation of work deployments, significant expenditures, and personnel selection [2]. - Attention is given to issues raised by the public, including complaints against the "top leader" and serious violations, to comprehensively understand the political ecology of the region or unit [2]. Group 3: Methods and Effectiveness - Various methods are employed for conversations and inquiries, including face-to-face discussions and online communications, to ensure effective information gathering and timely corrections [2]. - A regular conversation mechanism is established to maintain ongoing pressure and reminders, integrating various activities such as research and guidance sessions [2]. Group 4: Follow-up and Accountability - The process emphasizes the importance of addressing identified issues and ensuring that corrective actions are taken, with a focus on collaborative analysis and deep inspection of responsibilities [3]. - There is a commitment to serious accountability for units and individuals that fail to rectify issues, particularly those that conceal information or protect wrongdoers, to promote a positive political ecology [3].