Group 1 - The core viewpoint emphasizes the need for strengthening the responsibility and supervision of comprehensive strict governance of the Party, with a focus on the roles of the Party committee and the discipline inspection commission [1] - The Anhui Provincial State-owned Capital Operation Holding Group Co., Ltd. has implemented specialized supervision to ensure high-quality development through political, daily, and special supervision [1][2] Group 2 - Political supervision is prioritized to ensure the effective implementation of the "two responsibilities," focusing on the significance of deepening reforms and ensuring accountability within the Party [1] - Daily supervision is enhanced by revising internal supervision systems and establishing a comprehensive network to ensure that all levels of management are held accountable for both business and ethical conduct [2] - Special supervision is utilized to address serious violations, with a focus on key areas and personnel, ensuring that corrective actions are taken based on audit and inspection feedback [3]

Core Viewpoint - The establishment of a hierarchical and regular conversation and inquiry mechanism by the disciplinary inspection and supervision authorities is an effective exploration to integrate political supervision with daily supervision, ensuring that supervision is embedded in daily operations and conducted regularly [1][2]. Group 1: Mechanism and Implementation - The mechanism involves regular conversations and inquiries from higher-level disciplinary secretaries to lower-level secretaries to understand the implementation of decisions, major matters, and the integrity of key personnel, particularly the "top leader" [1]. - The approach emphasizes the importance of political responsibility and daily supervision, particularly focusing on the "top leader" to enhance political awareness and clarify responsibilities [1][2]. Group 2: Focus Areas - The focus of conversations and inquiries is on weak points in supervision and potential corruption risks, particularly regarding the implementation of work deployments, significant expenditures, and personnel selection [2]. - Attention is given to issues raised by the public, including complaints against the "top leader" and serious violations, to comprehensively understand the political ecology of the region or unit [2]. Group 3: Methods and Effectiveness - Various methods are employed for conversations and inquiries, including face-to-face discussions and online communications, to ensure effective information gathering and timely corrections [2]. - A regular conversation mechanism is established to maintain ongoing pressure and reminders, integrating various activities such as research and guidance sessions [2]. Group 4: Follow-up and Accountability - The process emphasizes the importance of addressing identified issues and ensuring that corrective actions are taken, with a focus on collaborative analysis and deep inspection of responsibilities [3]. - There is a commitment to serious accountability for units and individuals that fail to rectify issues, particularly those that conceal information or protect wrongdoers, to promote a positive political ecology [3].