科技部机关纪委健全廉政风险防控机制 提升日常监督穿透力有效性 中央纪委国家监委网站 韩思宁 前不久，科学技术部机关纪委书记廖建华来到某科研项目评审现场，对正在进行的专家评审环节进 行"四不两直"监督检查。此次评审由科技部国际科技合作中心组织，采取网络方式进行，会场大屏幕 上，多位评审专家的实时画面集中显示。 检查过程中，廖建华发现，个别评审专家的视频画面显示不太规范，随即向有关负责人员提出，要提醒 专家将主要评审行为全程置于可视范围内，保持动作清晰可见，确保评审过程严肃透明、严谨公正。 "收到建议后，我们立即调整修改，并在评审结束后举一反三，细化完善视频评审的监督巡查制度，努 力从制度层面防范化解风险。"科技部国际科技合作中心副主任邓炜说。 "履行好监督职责是必须落实到位的政治任务" "每次项目评审前，我们都会根据项目特点制定重点监督清单，到现场开展监督检查，督促机关主责部 门严格落实各项管理措施。"廖建华介绍，他们除了对评审进行"四不两直"现场监督检查，还加强对项 目申报、评审立项、项目实施、综合绩效评价等关键环节的日常监督，形成从事前到事中、事后的全过 程、常态化监督链条。 对科研项目管理开展监督，是科技 ...

Group 1 - Strengthening grassroots supervision is essential for promoting strict governance of the Party at the grassroots level and addressing urgent issues faced by the public [1] - The discipline inspection and supervision agencies should focus on early and small-scale interventions, advancing the supervision process and establishing a comprehensive grassroots supervision network [1] - Regular education and training should be conducted to reinforce the Party's innovative theoretical framework as a primary political task, ensuring that Party discipline is integrated into daily education and management [1] Group 2 - Daily supervision should focus on areas with concentrated power, dense funding, and abundant resources, emphasizing key sectors and major projects for comprehensive management [2] - A collaborative supervision network should be established, involving various levels of discipline inspection committees and grassroots supervisors to enhance accountability and problem reporting [2] - Rectification and implementation of corrective measures should be prioritized, utilizing typical case studies to promote reform and address underlying issues [2] Group 3 - It is crucial to tighten and enforce the principal responsibility for supervision, ensuring accountability is effectively managed to facilitate strict governance of the Party [3] - The establishment of responsibility lists and risk prevention manuals is necessary to clarify supervisory responsibilities and ensure they are assigned to specific individuals [3] - A robust accountability mechanism should be maintained, with strict consequences for failing to fulfill responsibilities, thereby promoting a culture of accountability within the organization [3]

Group 1 - The article emphasizes the importance of unifying strict management supervision and encouraging responsibility among party members to foster a positive political environment for development and reform [3][4][12] - It highlights that a good political ecology is essential for party members to effectively engage in their work, and that overcoming challenges requires courage and innovative thinking [4][5] - The article discusses the need for the supervisory body to adapt to new tasks and responsibilities, ensuring that supervision is comprehensive and effective across various departments [6][11] Group 2 - The article outlines the role of political supervision in supporting responsible actions, focusing on political loyalty, safety, and accountability [7][10] - It stresses the importance of daily supervision and clear behavioral standards for party members, promoting a culture of compliance and proactive engagement [8][9] - The article calls for a balance between strict enforcement of regulations and supportive measures for those who take initiative, aiming to create an environment that encourages practical action and accountability [9][12]

Group 1 - The core viewpoint emphasizes the need for strengthening the responsibility and supervision of comprehensive strict governance of the Party, with a focus on the roles of the Party committee and the discipline inspection commission [1] - The Anhui Provincial State-owned Capital Operation Holding Group Co., Ltd. has implemented specialized supervision to ensure high-quality development through political, daily, and special supervision [1][2] Group 2 - Political supervision is prioritized to ensure the effective implementation of the "two responsibilities," focusing on the significance of deepening reforms and ensuring accountability within the Party [1] - Daily supervision is enhanced by revising internal supervision systems and establishing a comprehensive network to ensure that all levels of management are held accountable for both business and ethical conduct [2] - Special supervision is utilized to address serious violations, with a focus on key areas and personnel, ensuring that corrective actions are taken based on audit and inspection feedback [3]

Core Viewpoint - The establishment of a hierarchical and regular conversation and inquiry mechanism by the disciplinary inspection and supervision authorities is an effective exploration to integrate political supervision with daily supervision, ensuring that supervision is embedded in daily operations and conducted regularly [1][2]. Group 1: Mechanism and Implementation - The mechanism involves regular conversations and inquiries from higher-level disciplinary secretaries to lower-level secretaries to understand the implementation of decisions, major matters, and the integrity of key personnel, particularly the "top leader" [1]. - The approach emphasizes the importance of political responsibility and daily supervision, particularly focusing on the "top leader" to enhance political awareness and clarify responsibilities [1][2]. Group 2: Focus Areas - The focus of conversations and inquiries is on weak points in supervision and potential corruption risks, particularly regarding the implementation of work deployments, significant expenditures, and personnel selection [2]. - Attention is given to issues raised by the public, including complaints against the "top leader" and serious violations, to comprehensively understand the political ecology of the region or unit [2]. Group 3: Methods and Effectiveness - Various methods are employed for conversations and inquiries, including face-to-face discussions and online communications, to ensure effective information gathering and timely corrections [2]. - A regular conversation mechanism is established to maintain ongoing pressure and reminders, integrating various activities such as research and guidance sessions [2]. Group 4: Follow-up and Accountability - The process emphasizes the importance of addressing identified issues and ensuring that corrective actions are taken, with a focus on collaborative analysis and deep inspection of responsibilities [3]. - There is a commitment to serious accountability for units and individuals that fail to rectify issues, particularly those that conceal information or protect wrongdoers, to promote a positive political ecology [3].