Core Viewpoint - The article emphasizes that the rule of law is the cornerstone of optimizing the business environment, and regulating administrative law enforcement related to enterprises is key to stimulating market vitality [1] Group 1: Challenges in Administrative Law Enforcement - Local enforcement has historically oscillated between overreach and negligence, causing disruptions to normal business operations [1] - Overreach includes arbitrary expansions of inspection scope and frequent checks that disrupt production, while negligence allows illegal activities to persist, as seen in the case of illegal mining in Ningxia Zhongwei [1] - Both extremes represent a deviation from the spirit of the law, highlighting the need for a balanced approach to enforcement that neither oversteps nor underregulates [1] Group 2: Technological Solutions by Shandong Dastech - Shandong Dastech Intelligent Technology Co., Ltd. provides a series of smart law enforcement systems that enhance enforcement effectiveness [2] - The Environmental Power Monitoring System allows real-time monitoring of electricity usage to identify pollution activities, reducing unnecessary disruptions to businesses [4] - The Mobile Source Access Control System manages vehicle pollution by monitoring and controlling access to vehicles, especially during heavy pollution periods [6] - The Ultra-Low Emission Control Platform integrates various emission data to shift regulatory practices from manual intervention to intelligent, visualized monitoring [9] - The Super Archive Management System creates comprehensive electronic records for polluting enterprises, streamlining the inspection process and reducing time spent on checks [12] - The Non-Site Supervision Platform utilizes IoT, big data, and GIS technologies to provide a panoramic view of polluting enterprises, enabling differentiated and precise management [12] Group 3: Importance of Balanced Enforcement - The practices of Shandong Dastech illustrate that effective regulation of enterprise law enforcement requires a balance between strict management and supportive measures [12] - The principle of "avoiding impact on production and operation" must be rooted in lawful administration, ensuring that enforcement actions are both effective and considerate [12] - By employing these smart systems, law enforcement can avoid the pitfalls of excessive intervention or neglect, thereby protecting legal integrity and fostering business confidence [12]

两项政策的出台，标志着行政检查从"粗放式管理"向"精细化治理"转变。过去，检查标准模糊、文书格 式混乱，容易滋生权力寻租。如今，全国统一的文书格式与动态公布的检查事项清单相结合，让"查什 么、怎么查"一目了然。更重要的是，《格式文本》允许地方结合实际调整文书，但明确不得减损权 益、增加义务，既保留了灵活性，又守住了法治底线。生态环境部门应建立文书动态评估机制，针对危 废处置、辐射安全等特殊领域，在省级层面制定补充文本，但必须经合法性审查后方可实施。 一张审批表、一份通知书，看似只是格式调整，实则是政府治理能力升级的体现，让涉企行政检查更加 规范透明，企业面对检查不再无所适从，得以将更多的精力投入生产经营。地方生态环境部门需以落实 《格式文本》为契机，深化"智慧执法"系统完善，将排污许可信息、在线监测数据与行政检查智能匹 配，实现"一企一档"自动生成检查要点，减少重复录入。分行业制定规范化检查指南，针对重点行业， 编制涵盖现场勘查、采样监测等环节的操作细则，同步建立典型执法案例库，为基层提供"场景化"执法 参考。强化执法监督与业务协同，探索环境信用评价与执法频次挂钩机制，对环保绩效评级高的企业， 依法简化检查程 ...