Core Viewpoint - The grassroots ecological environment law enforcement is facing new challenges, necessitating a transformation to enhance enforcement effectiveness and service levels to support high-quality economic and social development [1] Group 1: Legal Awareness and Education - The traditional law enforcement approach primarily relies on post-incident penalties, which fails to fundamentally improve enterprises' compliance awareness. A comprehensive legal education approach is needed throughout the enforcement process [2] - A dual approach of "on-site + non-site" legal education should be established, targeting specific ecological and environmental pain points of different industries [2] - The "law enforcement + legal education" model should be promoted, where enforcement personnel actively explain relevant environmental regulations during inspections to guide enterprises in rectifying issues [2] Group 2: Integrated Supervision - The new requirements aim to reduce the frequency of inspections, promoting a comprehensive and streamlined inspection process to alleviate the burden on enterprises [3] - Utilizing online monitoring and non-contact supervision methods, such as drone surveillance, can help maintain oversight without disrupting normal business operations [3] - This "non-intrusive" inspection model aims to prevent environmental violations while creating a conducive environment for enterprises to operate [3] Group 3: Communication and Collaboration - Establishing a regular and diverse communication channel between enforcement agencies and enterprises is crucial to enhance understanding and cooperation [4] - Enforcement personnel should guide enterprises to appoint dedicated environmental contacts for ongoing communication and updates on policies and standards [4] - Engaging in face-to-face discussions through meetings can help gather enterprise feedback and ensure that enforcement aligns with actual business needs [4] Group 4: Proactive Conflict Resolution - Transitioning from a passive reception of complaints to proactive outreach is essential for resolving environmental disputes between enterprises and surrounding communities [5] - A mechanism for "on-site mediation + follow-up supervision" should be established to address key environmental complaints effectively [5] - This proactive approach aims to create a feedback loop that enhances understanding of environmental protection efforts among the public and promotes compliance among enterprises [5] Group 5: Balancing Enforcement and Support - The judicial department has developed standardized documents to regulate administrative enforcement processes, ensuring that enforcement actions are both authoritative and supportive of enterprise development [6] - Enforcement personnel must adhere to clear guidelines to avoid arbitrary inspections and ensure that checks are efficient and non-redundant [6] - A balance between regulation and support is necessary, with a focus on guiding enterprises to rectify non-intentional environmental issues rather than imposing penalties [6]

在当前规范涉企行政检查的政策背景下，各地生态环境部门纷纷结合实际情况，优化创新执法方式、提 升执法质效，涌现出许多成功案例。 企业在随后的自查环节发现了一些明显问题，但由于自身专业性不够，担心可能还有其他生态环境问题 没有发现，于是决定请生态环境执法人员过来帮忙"诊断"。两家企业各自向荔湾分局提交了"预约式"执 法服务申请。在随后的执法帮扶过程中，荔湾分局没有开出一张罚单，却让两家企业吃下了"定心丸"， 毕竟执法人员带着专家们"手把手"地教企业如何整改，比企业自己摸索效率要高得多。整改到位后，问 题也不会反复出现了。 但同时也要注意，在实际工作中，仍有一些企业只算经济账，想方设法逃避社会责任。在他们的小算盘 里，相比稳定运行污染治理设施的长期开支，偶尔被罚仍是"节省"了企业生产成本的，因此有恶意违法 的主观故意。对于这些企业，要通过分析历史数据和执法记录，细心观察现场，精准识别，重点盯防。 若遇到经严格监管仍屡犯不改的企业，甚至可以组建临时专班，查实企业恶意违法行为并依法查处，同 时通过广泛宣传以案说法，对心存侥幸者形成震慑。 有的企业在生态环境保护方面欠账较多，而且风险意识不强，需要猛喝一声，使其清醒过来。 ...

Core Viewpoint - The event aims to enhance the enforcement capabilities of ecological environment protection in Jilin Province through a combination of training and practical skills competitions [1] Group 1: Event Overview - The ecological environment protection enforcement skills competition and practical training took place from September 1 to October 28, organized by the Jilin Provincial Department of Ecology and Environment in collaboration with the Jilin Provincial Federation of Trade Unions [1] - The event innovatively integrates enforcement position training, skills competition, and practical exercises [1] Group 2: Training and Skills Competition - The second phase of enforcement position training focuses on addressing weaknesses and enhancing capabilities, covering policy interpretations, practical enforcement, and key points for inspections [1] - The skills competition emphasizes the dual enhancement of enforcement team building and capabilities, utilizing VR simulations, drones, and various detection instruments [1] Group 3: Participation and Objectives - Nearly 90 enforcement personnel from 10 teams across the province participated in the competition [1] - The competition aims to identify and address significant environmental issues and illegal activities, thereby improving the intelligence and precision of enforcement supervision [1]

今年5月，扬州市印发《关于规范生态环境涉企行政检查的具体措施》，要求对同一企业的多项检查合 并开展，实现"一次进门、全面体检"。并且严格执行行政检查报批制度，除触发式个案检查外，未纳入 年度计划、未经批准的，不得开展入企检查，做到"凡检查必审批"。 近日，扬州市生态环境局新闻发布会公布的数据显示，全市环境执法数量实现"两连降"：2024年全年为 12116次，同比下降23%；今年1—8月为6047次，同比下降21%。"两连降"的背后，缘于执法方式的优 化和执法行为的更加规范，另一方面是因为营商环境的优化，更多企业养成了自觉守护环境的习惯，政 企双方合力同心，推动生态环境高水平保护与经济社会高质量发展进入了良性循环。 同时，全面实行"扫码入企"，执法人员通过手机"亮证"，企业扫码可查看执法人员姓名、证件编号、所 属主体及检查内容；检查完成后，企业扫码即可获取检查结果，确保过程公开透明。而且对执法实施全 过程管控，执法任务由平台下达，执法行为全程同步记录，实现执法事项电子化、清单化、流程化。 扬州环境执法数量连续两年同比两连降 优化执法方式，变现场执法为"非现场"执法、"邀约式"执法 此外，扬州市优化正面清单纳入 ...

中新网9月26日电 据生态环境部微信公众号消息，自2020年《关于实施生态环境违法行为举报奖励制度 的指导意见》发布以来，全国各省(区、市)逐步建立健全举报奖励制度，广大人民群众充分行使自身权 利，积极参与生态环境保护工作，通过举报各类生态环境违法行为，推动解决了一批群众身边的突出生 态环境问题。 生态环境部公布第二十四批生态环境执法典型案例(举报奖励领域) 2025年9月26日，生态环境部公布举报奖励领域的4个典型案例，并对查办案件的四川省自贡市沿滩生态 环境局、重庆市奉节县生态环境局、江西省南昌市生态环境局、陕西省宝鸡市生态环境局予以表扬。此 次公布的典型案例包括： 一、四川自贡对举报危险废物倾倒案的群众实施奖励 【制度背景】 2023年4月，四川省生态环境厅联合四川省财政厅共同印发《四川省生态环境违法行为举报奖励办法 (2023年版)》，生态环境部门根据举报线索查实生态环境违法行为依法作出处理处罚决定后，根据办法 相关规定给予举报人500至1万元奖励；对提供重大案件关键线索的，可给予举报人最高5万元奖励。 【基本案情】 2024年2月28日21时许，有群众拨打110投诉"我家小区附近空地好像有罐车在倒废 ...

Core Viewpoint - The article emphasizes the importance of practical skills competitions in the ecological environment sector to enhance the professional capabilities of environmental protection teams and adapt to new challenges in pollution prevention and control [1][2]. Group 1: Current Challenges - The ecological environment protection work is facing increasingly complex challenges, including diverse pollution prevention needs and more covert environmental violations, which require a significant upgrade in the capabilities of environmental protection teams [1]. - Some regions still exhibit a "form over substance" approach in skills competitions, focusing on standardized evaluation metrics that do not align with the practical needs of frontline operations [2]. Group 2: Recommendations for Improvement - Skills competitions should transition from "testing techniques" to "testing capabilities," utilizing real-world case studies to create a dynamic question bank that reflects practical challenges in environmental regulation [3]. - The content of competitions should include forward-looking assessments, such as monitoring new pollutants and applying new technologies like drones and AI for environmental monitoring [3][4]. Group 3: Competition Environment - The competition environment should simulate real-world conditions, moving away from traditional examination settings to more immersive scenarios that reflect actual operational challenges [4]. - Emphasis should be placed on collaborative operational capabilities, with competitions designed to test the coordination between monitoring, enforcement, and emergency response teams in simulated crisis situations [4].

Core Viewpoint - The integration of the Party's innovative theories, especially Xi Jinping's ecological civilization thought, into the entire process of ecological environment law enforcement is essential for enhancing enforcement effectiveness, addressing complex challenges, building social consensus, and developing a competent workforce [1][2][3]. Group 1: Strengthening Ideological Foundation - The Party's innovative theories provide fundamental guidance for ecological environment law enforcement, ensuring that enforcement work aligns with the correct political direction and maintains ecological safety [1]. Group 2: Enhancing Enforcement Effectiveness - The systematic and complex nature of ecological issues requires the application of the Party's innovative theories, which serve as a "golden key" to resolve enforcement challenges. This includes using systematic thinking to trace pollution sources, legal thinking to ensure procedural compliance, and problem-oriented thinking to identify violations [2]. Group 3: Building Public Trust - The enforcement of ecological laws is closely related to public interest and can attract social attention. Theoretical dissemination is crucial for explaining enforcement actions, addressing public concerns, and promoting understanding of the enforcement's role in safeguarding health and ecological security [2]. Group 4: Promoting Source Governance - Effective ecological governance relies on source prevention and multi-party collaboration. The Party's theories advocate for a shared responsibility model, encouraging enterprises and the public to engage in environmental protection and compliance with regulations [3]. Group 5: Developing a Competent Enforcement Team - A strong enforcement team is essential for implementing theories and fulfilling responsibilities. Theoretical education should be integrated into enforcement work to enhance the team's capabilities in understanding regulations, communication, and problem-solving, particularly for younger enforcers [3].

Group 1 - The core idea of the news is the implementation of a random selection process for participants in the ecological environment protection enforcement skills competition, aimed at enhancing fairness and inclusivity in the selection of competitors [1][2] - The initiative seeks to cultivate a new generation of skilled ecological environment enforcement personnel, promoting a competitive atmosphere that encourages learning and skill enhancement among all enforcement officers [2] - Previous practices of selecting fixed participants led to a lack of opportunities for many enforcement officers, while the new random selection method ensures equal chances for all, thereby improving overall business capabilities and morale [2][3] Group 2 - The random selection process has shown significant positive outcomes in other regions, such as Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region, where it led to improved performance and recognition in national competitions [2] - Effective management of the enforcement personnel database is crucial, including comprehensive inclusion criteria, dynamic updates based on personnel changes, and ongoing training to ensure all selected participants can demonstrate their true capabilities [3] - The establishment of clear and fair rules for the personnel database is essential to prevent local biases and ensure that all qualified enforcement officers are included [3]

Core Viewpoint - The "courtroom classroom" initiative implemented by the Linzhou branch of the Ecological Environment Bureau in Anyang, Henan Province, aims to enhance the capabilities of law enforcement personnel through immersive learning experiences in real judicial settings, addressing previous issues of evidence collection and procedural compliance [1][2]. Group 1 - The courtroom classroom allows law enforcement personnel to learn in a real judicial environment, which is more impactful than traditional theoretical training [1]. - This innovative training method addresses issues such as inadequate evidence collection and non-compliance with enforcement procedures, which previously led to poor enforcement outcomes and administrative litigation [1]. - The Linzhou branch plans to conduct courtroom classes quarterly, integrating various training elements including political education, ecological environment knowledge, legal regulations, and on-site enforcement simulations [1]. Group 2 - The "listening + discussion + rectification" closed-loop training model effectively integrates judicial practice with law enforcement, enhancing awareness of evidence, procedures, and legal thinking [2]. - This model not only improves the work capabilities of law enforcement personnel but also contributes to the standardization, modernization, professionalization, and institutionalization of the ecological environment enforcement system [2]. - The initiative helps build a highly qualified enforcement team, better protecting the ecological environment and public environmental rights, thus providing solid enforcement support for ecological civilization construction [2].

Core Viewpoint - The recent training session on ecological environment law enforcement emphasizes the need for precise, scientific, and lawful pollution control, while avoiding one-size-fits-all approaches and excessive burdens on enterprises [1][2] Group 1: Regulatory Framework - Strict regulation of administrative inspections related to enterprises is crucial for enhancing lawful administration, optimizing the business environment, and stabilizing market expectations [1] - The initiative aims to resolve deep-rooted contradictions in traditional regulatory models by optimizing systems to improve regulatory efficiency and unleash enterprise vitality [1][2] Group 2: Enforcement Practices - The combination of "normative enforcement" and "strict duty performance" is essential for modern governance, where effective regulation is achieved through standardized processes and rights protection mechanisms [1][2] - There is a zero-tolerance policy for actions that damage the ecological environment, which is necessary to delineate boundaries for high-quality development [2] Group 3: Inspection Frequency and Efficiency - The implementation of a "comprehensive check once" mechanism is proposed to enhance inspection efficiency by addressing multiple issues in a single visit [3] - The need to ensure that inspections are justified and based on legal grounds is emphasized, moving away from arbitrary and excessive inspections [3] Group 4: Technological Integration - The use of modern technologies such as big data, satellite remote sensing, and AI models is encouraged to improve the timeliness and accuracy of identifying violations [3] - The goal is to minimize disruptions for compliant enterprises while maintaining strict oversight on violators [3]