【环球网报道】据日本共同社7月27日报道，日本自卫队在去年实施的模拟所谓"台湾有事"的最高级别桌面推演中屡次要求美国使 用"核恐吓"抑制中国。消息曝光后，日本广岛县多个市民团体对此表示强烈反对，有日媒称，日本政府参与美国的核战略是绝对不 能被允许的。 《中国新闻》称，在日本民众看不到的地方，日本政府企图强化美国对日本的核保护伞。政府把民众抛在脑后参与美国的核战略， 这是绝对不能被允许的。 共同社26日报道，美国和日本在商讨美国以核武器和常规战力防卫日本的例行磋商中，多次进行设想突发事态的桌面推演，讨论美 军使用核武器的情形。报道称，美日两国去年12月首次制定《日美延伸威慑指针》，明确规定使用核武器的政府间协调程序，日方 可就使用核武问题向美方传达意见。 据共同社报道，多名日本政府相关人士透露，涉事桌面推演于去年2月举行，此次演习首次直接将中国列为假想敌，演习情形由日本 和美国的负责人共同制定。针对中方在美日设定的情形中"暗示使用核武器"，日本自卫队屡次要求美方使用"核恐吓"予以对抗。美国 最终接受了日方的要求。 共同社称，作为唯一的战争核武器受害国，日本一直在国际上呼吁废除核武器，但日方仍不忌惮使用核恐吓，（ ...

Core Viewpoint - The recent India-Pakistan conflict has highlighted the role of information warfare, with both sides claiming victory and utilizing social media to shape narratives, amidst a backdrop of misinformation and AI-generated content [1][2][3]. Group 1: Conflict Overview - A ceasefire agreement was reached on May 10 after several days of intense conflict, marking one of the most severe confrontations in recent years [1]. - The conflict saw significant aerial engagements, with both sides claiming to have inflicted damage on each other's military assets [1][3]. Group 2: Information Warfare - Misinformation has been rampant, with both Indian and Pakistani media disseminating unverified claims about military successes and losses [2][4]. - AI tools like Grok have been employed by netizens to verify the authenticity of videos and images related to the conflict, revealing a mix of credible and fabricated content [2][3]. Group 3: Domestic Reactions - In India, the media has reported exaggerated claims to stir nationalist sentiments, while the government has faced backlash for perceived weakness in handling the situation [4][5]. - Pakistan's media has taken a more subdued approach, focusing on maintaining public morale and avoiding incitement of anti-India sentiment [6][5]. Group 4: International Dynamics - The U.S. has been drawn into the narrative, with President Trump claiming credit for mediating the ceasefire, which India has denied, emphasizing its preference for no external intervention [7][8]. - The conflict has raised concerns about India's strategic autonomy, as international involvement could complicate its long-standing position on Kashmir as an internal matter [7][8].

Core Insights - The book "The Age of Artificial Intelligence and the Future of Humanity" by Henry Kissinger discusses AI as a strategic tool akin to nuclear weapons, influencing global power dynamics and international relations [3][11][24] - Kissinger emphasizes the need for dialogue between the US and China regarding AI to prevent escalating tensions and misunderstandings [6][15] Summary by Sections AI and Global Order - Kissinger's main argument is that AI will create a new world order similar to the Cold War era, with significant implications for global security and power structures [5][11] - He identifies the US and China as the leading nations in AI investment, warning that failure to engage in dialogue could exacerbate divisions [6][11] Historical Context - The book draws parallels between the current AI landscape and the nuclear arms race during the Cold War, highlighting the complexities and unpredictability of AI compared to nuclear weapons [13][14] - Kissinger's historical experience informs his perspective on the strategic use of technology in international relations [11][18] Strategic Implications - AI is viewed as a double-edged sword, presenting both opportunities for nations that integrate it into governance and military strategy, and risks of increased geopolitical conflict [12][13] - Kissinger suggests that nations will need to establish departments focused on AI to ensure technological leadership and manage international relations effectively [17][18] Diplomatic Strategies - The author advocates for using AI as a form of "nuclear deterrence," promoting communication and balance among nations to avoid catastrophic outcomes [19][26] - He argues against the inevitability of direct military conflict, emphasizing the importance of diplomatic solutions and strategic management of AI-related tensions [18][26] Conclusion - Kissinger's final work reflects a pragmatic view of AI as a strategic asset in international diplomacy, urging leaders to manage rather than eliminate conflict [24][26] - His insights serve as a reminder of the need for a balanced approach to emerging technologies in the context of global power dynamics [27][28]