Core Viewpoint - The article highlights the growing concern over the safety mechanisms of hidden door handles in vehicles following a recent explosion incident involving a Xiaomi car, prompting a market focus on the safety logic and design variations among different automotive brands [3][4]. Group 1: Vehicle Testing and Design Variations - A random test of over ten mainstream car brands, including Tesla, Xiaopeng, and Wanjie, revealed that hidden door handles are prevalent, but their safety mechanisms and opening methods vary significantly [3][5]. - The tested vehicles feature a mix of electronic and mechanical door handles, with most mechanical handles located inside the car, while hidden handles dominate the exterior design [5][9]. - Different brands employ various methods for unlocking and opening doors, such as pressing down on the handle or using touch sensors, indicating a range of design philosophies [6][7][8]. Group 2: Emergency Unlocking Mechanisms - Emergency unlocking features vary across brands, with some models automatically triggering unlock functions in emergencies, while others retain traditional mechanical handles for emergency access [8][10]. - The placement of mechanical unlocking mechanisms within the vehicle is often not intuitive, making it challenging for drivers or rescuers to locate them quickly in emergencies [10]. Group 3: Design Philosophy and Market Trends - The design choices reflect differing philosophies, with some brands like Great Wall and Volkswagen opting for traditional handle designs to prioritize energy efficiency and user experience [9][10]. - The article suggests that the automotive industry is at a crossroads, balancing innovative designs with practical safety considerations in response to consumer concerns [9].

Core Insights - The recent explosion incident involving the Xiaomi SU7 in Chengdu has heightened market focus on the safety mechanisms of car door handles [1] - A variety of car brands, including Tesla, Xiaopeng, and Wanjie, were tested for their door handle designs, revealing significant differences in safety logic and unlocking methods [1][2] Group 1: Door Handle Mechanisms - Many tested vehicles feature a mix of electronic and mechanical door handles, with hidden door handles being the mainstream design [1] - For instance, the Tesla Model Y and Xiaopeng MONA 03 require a press-and-pull mechanism after unlocking with a remote key [1] - The Wanjie M5 uses a hidden handle with a push design, while the M8 employs a sensing mechanism with a semi-hidden handle [2][3] Group 2: Emergency Unlocking Features - Some models, like the Zeekr 7X, automatically trigger unlocking in emergencies, utilizing a backup power source located at the rear of the vehicle [3] - The Volkswagen ID.6 offers both traditional and emergency pull-up handle options for unlocking doors [3] - The design of mechanical unlocking mechanisms varies, with some being less accessible and hidden within storage compartments [4] Group 3: Design Philosophy and Safety Considerations - Different brands exhibit varying design philosophies, with some, like Great Wall, opting for conservative designs focused on energy efficiency and user experience [4] - The placement of mechanical unlocking mechanisms is often not intuitive, making it challenging for drivers or rescuers to locate them in emergencies [4] - Recent designs, such as those from Tesla, have improved visibility for mechanical unlocking methods, contrasting with traditional designs that may hide these features [4]