Workflow
丰田BZ5
icon
Search documents
“这些车门把手是想逼疯我”!记者实测→
第一财经· 2025-10-16 05:14
2025.10. 16 本文字数:1330,阅读时长大约2分钟 从开门方式看,在用遥控钥匙解锁后,有一些需要按压下去,再用机械方式打开,比如特斯拉Model Y和小鹏的MONA 03。 特斯拉的销售介绍,用点赞的手势摁下一头以后,把手另一头可以弹起,然后打开车门。 丰田的BZ5和问界的M5在用车钥匙或手机解锁后,平行式把手会自动弹起,然后用把手拉开车门。 有一些车型采用的是电动或触摸式感应,比如问界M8 EV,手伸到半隐藏式的门把手下面,电动门 会自动感应打开。小鹏的P7需要触摸门把手前端电容按键,等门把手旋出后拉开车门。 作者 | 第一财经 葛慧 一场发生在成都的意外爆燃事故,让汽车门把手的隐蔽安全机制成为市场瞩目的焦点。 10月16日,第一财经记者实地探访上海一处大型商圈,对特斯拉、小鹏、问界等十余个主流品牌展 开随机测试,发现隐藏式把手虽为主流,但其背后的安全逻辑与开启方式却千差万别。 多名销售告诉记者,"10.13成都小米SU7爆燃事故"后,大家对于门把手的安全机制高度关注。 记者随机测试的十余款车包括特斯拉Model Y,极氪的001、7x和9x,丰田的bz5和铂智3x,问界 M8 EV,M5,小鹏 ...
关于汽车数据处理5项安全要求检测情况的通报(第三批)
Cai Jing Wang· 2025-08-18 11:50
Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the implementation of automotive data security compliance measures in China, aimed at protecting user rights and promoting a secure automotive industry environment starting from April 2025 [1]. Group 1: Regulatory Framework - The initiative is based on several regulations, including the "Automotive Data Security Management Regulations (Trial)" and GB/T 41871-2022 and GB/T 44464-2024 standards [1]. - The compliance checks will cover five key requirements, including anonymization of external facial information and handling of cabin data [1]. Group 2: Compliance Results - A total of 13 manufacturers, including FAW Toyota, Volkswagen, and Geely, have 49 vehicle models that meet the five compliance requirements [1]. - Specific models listed include the Toyota BZ5, Hongqi EH7, and Ideal L6, among others, with production years ranging from 2024 to 2025 [1]. Group 3: Data Security Issues - Some models were found to have data security issues, such as low anonymization detection rates for facial images and inadequate consent settings for sensitive personal information [2]. - Feedback has been provided to the relevant companies for necessary rectifications [2].
13家企业49款车型通过汽车数据安全合规检测
Xin Lang Ke Ji· 2025-08-18 08:34
Core Insights - The China Automotive Industry Association announced that 49 models from 13 manufacturers meet automotive data security compliance requirements, effective from April 2025 [1] Group 1: Compliance Findings - The compliance checks revealed that the 49 models from manufacturers such as FAW Toyota, Volkswagen, and Geely adhere to five key data security compliance requirements [1] - Some models were found to have data security issues, including a facial anonymization detection rate below 90% and improper consent settings for sensitive personal information [1] Group 2: Manufacturers and Models - The compliant models include the Toyota BZ5, various models from FAW Group, Volkswagen, Geely, and others, with specific model years primarily in 2024 and 2025 [2][3] - Notable manufacturers involved in the compliance include Xiaomi, Changan, and Great Wall Motors, among others [1][2]
第三批汽车数据处理5项安全要求检测情况公布
Xin Lang Cai Jing· 2025-08-18 08:18
Core Insights - The China Automotive Industry Association, in collaboration with several national organizations, has released a report on the compliance of automotive data processing safety requirements, highlighting the importance of data security in the automotive sector [1][2]. Group 1: Regulatory Framework - The report is based on the "Automotive Data Security Management Regulations (Trial)" and relevant standards such as GB/T 41871-2022 and GB/T 44464-2024, which outline the safety requirements for automotive data processing [2]. - Starting from April 2025, manufacturers will be required to undergo compliance checks for five key data safety requirements, including anonymization of external facial data and proper handling of personal information [2]. Group 2: Compliance Results - A total of 13 manufacturers, including FAW Toyota, FAW Group, Volkswagen, and others, have had 49 vehicle models that meet the five compliance requirements for automotive data safety [2][3]. - Specific models listed include the Toyota BZ5, Hongqi EH7, and several models from Geely, Li Auto, and others, indicating a broad compliance across major automotive brands [2][3]. Group 3: Identified Issues - The report also identified data security issues in some models, such as low anonymization rates for facial data and inadequate consent settings for processing sensitive personal information [3]. - Feedback has been provided to the relevant companies for necessary rectifications, emphasizing the ongoing need for improvement in data handling practices [3].
中国汽车工业协会:13家企业的49款车型符合汽车数据安全5项合规要求
Xin Lang Cai Jing· 2025-08-18 08:07
Core Points - The China Automotive Industry Association announced that starting from April 2025, it will conduct inspections on the data security compliance of automotive manufacturers' products, with 13 companies and 49 models already meeting five compliance requirements [1] - Some models were found to have data security issues, including low anonymization rates for facial recognition in video images, indefinite consent periods for sensitive personal information, and lack of privacy policies for applications on in-car systems [1] Group 1 - 13 companies including FAW Toyota, FAW Group, Volkswagen, Geely, Li Auto, Changan, Xiaomi, Seres, Xiaopeng, Chery, SAIC, Great Wall, and FAW Bestune have models that comply with data security requirements [1] - The compliance checks revealed that some models did not meet the anonymization requirement for facial data, with detection rates below 90% [1] - Companies have been notified to rectify the identified data security issues [1] Group 2 - A detailed list of compliant models includes the Toyota BZ5, Hongqi EH7, Volkswagen ID.UNYX, Zeekr 009, Li Auto L6, Xiaomi SU7, and others, with production years ranging from 2024 to 2025 [2][3] - The compliance requirements focus on five key areas, with some models not involving external facial information anonymization [2][3] - The inspection aims to enhance data security standards within the automotive industry, reflecting a growing emphasis on consumer privacy and data protection [1]
一汽丰田高管点名小米汽车“轮轴比”算错数:这个概念是雷军“发明”的
Qi Lu Wan Bao· 2025-08-13 02:33
Group 1 - Zhao Dong, an executive from FAW Toyota, publicly criticized Xiaomi Auto for incorrectly calculating the "wheel axle ratio," stating that the ratio for the Xiaomi YU7 is 4, not 3 [1][4] - Zhao emphasized that the concept of "wheel axle ratio" was invented by Lei Jun and does not exist in automotive theory, asserting that a ratio of 3 is unrealistic for passenger vehicles [4][6] - Following Xiaomi's promotion of the wheel axle ratio, many companies began to claim their vehicles also had a ratio of 3, which Zhao mockingly compared to students copying incorrect answers during an exam [6][8] Group 2 - The term "wheel axle ratio" gained popularity in the automotive industry after Xiaomi's promotion, with Lei Jun defining it in a way that lacks professional rigor [8][10] - The lack of immediate criticism from the automotive community after Xiaomi's announcement may be attributed to the complexity of the term, which ordinary consumers do not fully understand [10]