Core Viewpoint - The recent draft of national standards for vehicle safety emphasizes the need for stricter regulations on acceleration performance, particularly for electric vehicles, to enhance safety and mitigate risks associated with high initial power output [1][2][3] Group 1: Acceleration Standards - The draft stipulates that passenger vehicles must have a default acceleration time of no less than 5 seconds from 0 to 100 km/h after each start [1] - Some electric vehicle models, such as those from Xiaomi, have been criticized for promoting rapid acceleration as a marketing gimmick, which may not align with actual consumer driving needs [1][2] Group 2: Safety Features - The draft requires electric and plug-in hybrid vehicles to have a pedal misapplication acceleration suppression feature that detects and limits power output during stationary or crawling conditions [2] - New requirements for electronic door locking systems mandate that non-collision side doors automatically unlock during certain emergency situations, such as battery thermal events [2][3] Group 3: Industry Response - Recent incidents involving vehicle fires and malfunctioning door handles highlight the urgent need for improved safety standards in the automotive industry [3] - Experts emphasize that safety should be prioritized over speed and flashy marketing, advocating for a balance between innovation and safety in the rapidly evolving automotive sector [3]

Core Viewpoint - The article highlights the growing concern over the safety mechanisms of hidden door handles in vehicles following a recent explosion incident involving a Xiaomi car, prompting a market focus on the safety logic and design variations among different automotive brands [3][4]. Group 1: Vehicle Testing and Design Variations - A random test of over ten mainstream car brands, including Tesla, Xiaopeng, and Wanjie, revealed that hidden door handles are prevalent, but their safety mechanisms and opening methods vary significantly [3][5]. - The tested vehicles feature a mix of electronic and mechanical door handles, with most mechanical handles located inside the car, while hidden handles dominate the exterior design [5][9]. - Different brands employ various methods for unlocking and opening doors, such as pressing down on the handle or using touch sensors, indicating a range of design philosophies [6][7][8]. Group 2: Emergency Unlocking Mechanisms - Emergency unlocking features vary across brands, with some models automatically triggering unlock functions in emergencies, while others retain traditional mechanical handles for emergency access [8][10]. - The placement of mechanical unlocking mechanisms within the vehicle is often not intuitive, making it challenging for drivers or rescuers to locate them quickly in emergencies [10]. Group 3: Design Philosophy and Market Trends - The design choices reflect differing philosophies, with some brands like Great Wall and Volkswagen opting for traditional handle designs to prioritize energy efficiency and user experience [9][10]. - The article suggests that the automotive industry is at a crossroads, balancing innovative designs with practical safety considerations in response to consumer concerns [9].

Core Insights - The recent explosion incident involving the Xiaomi SU7 in Chengdu has heightened market focus on the safety mechanisms of car door handles [1] - A variety of car brands, including Tesla, Xiaopeng, and Wanjie, were tested for their door handle designs, revealing significant differences in safety logic and unlocking methods [1][2] Group 1: Door Handle Mechanisms - Many tested vehicles feature a mix of electronic and mechanical door handles, with hidden door handles being the mainstream design [1] - For instance, the Tesla Model Y and Xiaopeng MONA 03 require a press-and-pull mechanism after unlocking with a remote key [1] - The Wanjie M5 uses a hidden handle with a push design, while the M8 employs a sensing mechanism with a semi-hidden handle [2][3] Group 2: Emergency Unlocking Features - Some models, like the Zeekr 7X, automatically trigger unlocking in emergencies, utilizing a backup power source located at the rear of the vehicle [3] - The Volkswagen ID.6 offers both traditional and emergency pull-up handle options for unlocking doors [3] - The design of mechanical unlocking mechanisms varies, with some being less accessible and hidden within storage compartments [4] Group 3: Design Philosophy and Safety Considerations - Different brands exhibit varying design philosophies, with some, like Great Wall, opting for conservative designs focused on energy efficiency and user experience [4] - The placement of mechanical unlocking mechanisms is often not intuitive, making it challenging for drivers or rescuers to locate them in emergencies [4] - Recent designs, such as those from Tesla, have improved visibility for mechanical unlocking methods, contrasting with traditional designs that may hide these features [4]

Core Viewpoint - The Ministry of Industry and Information Technology (MIIT) is seeking public opinion on a draft mandatory national standard for automotive door handles, aimed at enhancing safety features and ensuring accessibility in emergency situations [1][2]. Group 1: Safety Standards - The draft standard specifies that each car door (excluding the tailgate) must be equipped with a mechanical release function for the outer door handle, allowing it to be opened without tools in emergencies such as irreversible restraint device deployment or battery thermal events [1][2]. - The design of the door handle system must ensure that the non-collision side door can be opened from the outside without tools, even when the locking mechanism is engaged [1]. Group 2: Accessibility Requirements - The draft includes new requirements for the positioning and operational space of the outer door handle to improve rescue convenience, mandating a hand operation space of at least 60mm x 20mm x 25mm relative to the vehicle's surface [1][2]. - Each car door must also have an inner door handle with a mechanical release function, which can unlock and open the door without external tools. If equipped with an electric inner door handle, it must also include a mechanical emergency release [2]. Group 3: Feedback Timeline - The deadline for public feedback on the draft is set for November 22, 2025 [3].