白皮书由嘉法邦（南通）法律咨询公司结合客户咨询案例编制，聚焦企业运营管理、个人日常生活、商会运营管理三大维度，梳理典型法律纠纷案例、对应 法律条文并提出风险防范要点，为不同主体提供全面的法律风险规避指引，同时介绍了嘉法邦集团的综合法律服务能力。 企业运营管理篇涵盖七大核心风险领域。劳动人事方面，重点规范试用期约定与劳动合同解除流程，明确企业需留存员工不符录用条件的证据并依法支付补 偿；债权债务纠纷多因合同约定不明、证据留存不足引发，企业需明确合同核心条款并及时维权；财会税务领域严禁偷税、虚开发票等行为，要求合法开展 税收筹划；知识产权需做好作品登记与授权核查，及时维权；股东关系中，股权转让需保障其他股东优先购买权，严格遵循法定程序；决策风险要求企业建 立尽职调查与内部监督机制，规范决策流程；刑事犯罪则警示企业需通过合法渠道融资，杜绝非法吸收公众存款等行为。 个人日常生活篇梳理九类常见法律问题。合同纠纷、劳动纠纷均强调书面协议的重要性，劳动者需主动签订劳动合同，遭遇侵权及时收集证据维权；侵权纠 纷以宠物伤人为主，饲养人需履行安全管理义务；知识产权纠纷针对作品改编、传播等侵权行为，原创者应做好权利登记；婚姻家庭纠 ...

（来源：团结报） 转自：团结报 本报宣城讯 1月16日，民革安徽中山法律援助维权中心宣城工作站到宣城市石油流通行业协会开展专题 普法。现场约60名加油站企业主参加学习。 活动中，工作站负责人、律师袁长军以《加油站常见法律风险实务防范》为题，讲解了相关的安全生 产、消费者权益等法律风险。讲座通过以案释法的方式，将法律条文与实际典型案例紧密结合，为加油 站企业主提升安全生产、合同管理规范性、防范经营风险提供了专业指导。同时，袁长军以常见法律问 题与大家积极互动，让与会者对工作、生活中可能遇到的法律问题有了更为清晰、明确的认识。 据悉，民革宣城市委会自成立法律援助工作站以来，持续开展普法送法"六进"活动，2025年共办理法援 案件60件，挽回经济损失110余万元。此外，还多次开展普法进校园、进企业、进乡镇活动。（胡 琴） ...

Core Insights - The "2025 Wealth Management Legal Services White Paper" was jointly released by Taikang Law Business Service Center, Taikang Family Office, and Zero Point You Shu, marking a significant development in understanding the legal service needs of high-net-worth individuals [1][3] - This second edition builds upon the first white paper published in 2023, which identified key legal risks in five areas: marriage, inheritance, retirement, family-business integration, and policy awareness [3][4] Group 1: Key Developments - The white paper focuses on four major upgrades for 2025, including trend analysis, policy and technology insights, dynamic risk mapping, and comprehensive risk profiling across different life stages [4][5] - Eight significant events in the wealth management legal sector were identified and analyzed, providing a snapshot of current market opportunities and challenges [6] Group 2: New Wealth Management Trends - The white paper reveals five new trends in wealth management, emphasizing the importance of wealth security in a volatile environment, with nearly 70% of high-net-worth individuals prioritizing wealth safety [8] - There is a notable increase in legal risk awareness, with a score of 67.6 in 2025, up 21 percentage points from 2023, highlighting concerns among both large and small families regarding wealth distribution and elder care [8][9] - Different life stages present unique risks, from single individuals to families and businesses, with evolving concerns as individuals progress through life [8][9] Group 3: Risk Management Strategies - Legal risk prevention is shifting from reactive measures to proactive strategies, with 34.6% of individuals opting for legal agreements to mitigate marriage risks and 59.0% prioritizing wealth planning for retirement [9] - AI is becoming an essential tool for high-net-worth individuals, with nearly 30% using AI legal services daily, although trust in AI remains cautious among more educated and affluent groups [9]

Core Viewpoint - The case highlights the legal risks associated with informal pet-sitting arrangements made through social media, emphasizing the importance of clear agreements and documentation to prevent disputes [1][3][4]. Group 1: Case Summary - Zhang and Li entered into an informal agreement for Li to care for Zhang's cat during a holiday, with Li paying a deposit of 2000 yuan [1]. - Li left Beijing without notifying Zhang, resulting in the cat's health issues, prompting Zhang to return early and request Li to vacate the premises, retaining 1400 yuan from the deposit for damages [2]. - The court found that while no formal contract existed, both parties had a mutual understanding of the arrangement, leading to a mediation where Zhang returned 600 yuan of the deposit to Li [2]. Group 2: Legal Insights - The judge noted that informal pet-sitting agreements can lead to various legal risks, including unclear rights and obligations due to the absence of a written contract [3]. - Recommendations for preventing such disputes include verifying the identity of the pet-sitter, clearly outlining responsibilities in a written agreement, and documenting the arrangement through monitoring and communication [4][5]. - The article suggests that both parties should agree on the standards for service, payment, and potential penalties for breach of contract to minimize legal risks [6].