Core Viewpoint - A plagiarism controversy in the literary world, initiated by a "plagiarism blogger," is intensifying, prompting major literary magazines in China to implement stricter plagiarism checks and software to ensure content originality [1][4][10]. Group 1: Response from Literary Magazines - The newly released issue of "Hua Cheng" magazine announced the use of plagiarism detection software starting from its 2025 issue [1]. - "Shouhuo" magazine expressed gratitude to the blogger for highlighting plagiarism issues and called for purer originality [3]. - "Tianya" magazine stated that any authors found guilty of plagiarism would be publicly condemned and barred from publishing in the magazine [3]. - "People's Literature" magazine emphasized the importance of originality and pledged to increase the rigor of manuscript checks [3]. Group 2: Impact on Authors - The plagiarism scandal has led to significant discussions about the definitions of plagiarism versus borrowing in literature, with many accused authors choosing to remain silent [4]. - Notable authors, including Jiang Fangzhou and Sun Ping, have acknowledged their past mistakes regarding unintentional plagiarism and expressed a willingness to learn from the criticism [7]. - Some authors, like Ding Yan, have questioned the validity of sentence-level plagiarism checks, arguing that similarities in phrasing do not necessarily equate to plagiarism [8]. Group 3: Historical Context and Ongoing Issues - Plagiarism has been a longstanding issue in the literary field, with notable cases dating back to 2006 involving high-profile authors [10][11]. - The rise of AI tools has made it easier to detect plagiarism, leading to increased scrutiny of literary works [11]. - The current situation reflects a broader cultural shift towards valuing originality and the integrity of literary creation [13].

Group 1 - The core issue of plagiarism and "washing" is the infringement of intellectual property rights, which is considered a person's intellectual achievement and should not be violated [1][2] - "Washing" is described as a more sophisticated form of plagiarism, where original works are altered without permission, leading to substantial similarities in core facts and arguments [1][2] - The phenomenon of "washing" is often linked to self-media practices, where individuals seek to profit from minimal effort, leading to a waste of editorial resources and potential issues for media outlets [2] Group 2 - Platforms related to "washing" should take responsibility by enhancing management awareness and establishing mechanisms to address complaints effectively [3] - Legal actions should be taken against severe cases of "washing," as demonstrated by a recent court ruling in Shanghai where individuals were sentenced for illegal operations involving AI software for "washing" [3] - "Washing" violates journalistic ethics and infringes on intellectual property rights, highlighting the need for stricter enforcement in the digital age [4]