摄影博主@宠物摄影师菌菇（下称"菌菇"）做梦都没想到，有一天她会在社交平台上刷到一组与自己想法如此一 致的作品，构图、修图手法、道具位置甚至照片里狗的神态都与自己此前发过的照片如此相似，只不过狗被换成 了另外一只。 "这大概率是被AI直接嫁接过来的。"菌菇向新京报贝壳财经记者介绍，在AI工具出现以前，使用其他的修图软件 很难实现完全复刻照片中狗狗的神态与姿态。 一直以来，抄袭、洗稿都是困扰原创者的难题，AI的出现让图片抄袭的门槛变得更低。抄袭者无需具备专业技 能，仅需原图+提示词的方式，即可生成"新"图片，而与此前抄袭"形"不同相比，AI诞生后依靠"图生图"功能，甚 至能够模仿出原图主角的"神韵"。 新京报贝壳财经记者尝试将菌菇拍摄的宠物照片分别"投喂"给豆包、元宝、千问、DeepSeek、Kimi五个人工智能 大模型进行测试，其中，豆包、元宝、千问可直接根据指令生成所需图片，虽然宠物狗的毛色甚至品种发生了变 化，却拥有着同样的神态，足以以假乱真。 贝壳财经记者使用AI大模型进行测试生成。 新京报贝壳财经记者调查发现，文字同样成了"AI洗稿"的重灾区，甚至衍生出一门生意。在社交媒体上，出现不 少"零基础小白日 ...

摄影博主@宠物摄影师菌菇（下称"菌菇"）做梦都没想到，有一天她会在社交平台上刷到一组与自己想 法如此一致的作品，构图、修图手法、道具位置甚至照片里狗的神态都与自己此前发过的照片如此相 似，只不过狗被换成了另外一只。 "这大概率是被AI直接嫁接过来的。"菌菇向新京报贝壳财经记者介绍，在AI工具出现以前，使用其他的 修图软件很难实现完全复刻照片中狗狗的神态与姿态。 一直以来，抄袭、洗稿都是困扰原创者的难题，AI的出现让图片抄袭的门槛变得更低。抄袭者无需具 备专业技能，仅需原图+提示词的方式，即可生成"新"图片，而与此前抄袭"形"不同相比，AI诞生后依 靠"图生图"功能，甚至能够模仿出原图主角的"神韵"。 新京报贝壳财经记者尝试将菌菇拍摄的宠物照片分别"投喂"给豆包、元宝、千问、DeepSeek、Kimi五个 人工智能大模型进行测试，其中，豆包、元宝、千问可直接根据指令生成所需图片，虽然宠物狗的毛色 甚至品种发生了变化，却拥有着同样的神态，足以以假乱真。 贝壳财经记者使用AI大模型进行测试生成。 新京报贝壳财经记者调查发现，文字同样成了"AI洗稿"的重灾区，甚至衍生出一门生意。在社交媒体 上，出现不少"零基础小白日 ...

Group 1 - The short drama industry has experienced rapid growth, reaching a market size of 600 billion in just five years, surpassing the 23 years of marketization in Chinese cinema [7] - The industry is undergoing significant transformation, with many companies shutting down, employees leaving, and entrepreneurs seeking new directions [4][9] - The business model and content types within the short drama industry are changing dramatically, leading to a shift in the roles and expectations of industry participants [8][9] Group 2 - Many industry professionals report challenges such as layoffs, legal disputes, and financial losses, indicating a turbulent environment [3] - The rise of AI-generated scripts and the dominance of platforms are reshaping the creative landscape, often prioritizing quantity over quality [57] - The competition within the industry is intense, with a focus on rapid production and market adaptation, leading to a dichotomy between profit-making and artistic integrity [56][59] Group 3 - The platforms have gained significant power, dictating terms and conditions for production companies, which has led to a decrease in creative freedom [29][33] - The financial dynamics have shifted, with platforms increasing their revenue share from creators, impacting the profitability of production companies [30][48] - The industry is at a crossroads, where the future may depend on the ability of creators to navigate these changes and determine their priorities between financial success and meaningful work [59][60]

Group 1 - The core issue of plagiarism and "washing" is the infringement of intellectual property rights, which is considered a person's intellectual achievement and should not be violated [1][2] - "Washing" is described as a more sophisticated form of plagiarism, where original works are altered without permission, leading to substantial similarities in core facts and arguments [1][2] - The phenomenon of "washing" is often linked to self-media practices, where individuals seek to profit from minimal effort, leading to a waste of editorial resources and potential issues for media outlets [2] Group 2 - Platforms related to "washing" should take responsibility by enhancing management awareness and establishing mechanisms to address complaints effectively [3] - Legal actions should be taken against severe cases of "washing," as demonstrated by a recent court ruling in Shanghai where individuals were sentenced for illegal operations involving AI software for "washing" [3] - "Washing" violates journalistic ethics and infringes on intellectual property rights, highlighting the need for stricter enforcement in the digital age [4]

Core Points - Shanghai police have cracked a case involving the use of artificial intelligence to fabricate and disseminate online rumors that harm corporate interests, resulting in the arrest of eight suspects [1][8]. Group 1: Incident Overview - In early 2023, a tea beverage company in Shanghai reported to the police that multiple self-media platforms were spreading false information about the company and its founder, damaging the brand image and affecting normal operations, with some stores experiencing a daily revenue drop of over 20% year-on-year [2]. - Following the report, the police established a special task force to investigate the matter [2]. Group 2: Method of Operation - The suspect Yao, a professional self-media operator, sought to increase traffic to his financial account to earn advertising revenue, which had been low. He paid 800 yuan to find a ghostwriter online [6]. - The ghostwriter, Lu, used AI to generate an article containing numerous false claims about the tea beverage company, which Yao published across multiple self-media accounts, leading to a rapid increase in online views and public skepticism towards the company [6]. - Another suspect, Chen, who primarily operated AI network training, contacted a friend to promote his training courses by suggesting that articles with high readership could yield cash withdrawals. He collected various unverified rumors about the company's founder and used AI to rewrite them before publishing on his friend's account, achieving significant readership in a short time [6][7]. Group 3: Legal Action - All eight suspects have been subjected to criminal coercive measures by the Shanghai police [8].