俄罗斯总统普京7日会见俄国防部、总参谋部和特别军事行动部队指挥官时表示，目前战略主动权完全 掌握在俄罗斯联邦武装力量手中。国防企业按计划交付各类高精度武器、导弹、弹药及军事装备，与此 同时最新型作战武器的研发及其部队列装工作正以超前速度推进。 普京强调，俄军的总体任务依然不变——必须确保特别军事行动设定的所有目标都无条件实现。 普京指出，乌军在整个接触线持续后撤。乌方对俄罗斯境内纵深地区的纯民用设施实施打击，是为了向 其西方"赞助者"展示成绩。俄罗斯的任务是保障俄罗斯公民的安全，保障战略设施和民用基础设施，包 括能源设施的安全。 俄武装力量总参谋长格拉西莫夫在报告中表示，俄军继续作战行动，在几乎所有方向实施进攻，乌军力 图稳定前线局势，延缓俄军进攻速度。 （文章来源：央视新闻） ...

Core Viewpoint - Trump's recent statements indicate a significant shift in his stance on the Russia-Ukraine conflict, suggesting that Ukraine can reclaim all territories occupied by Russia with the support of Europe and NATO, and urging immediate action from Ukraine [1][3][4]. Group 1: Trump's Statements and Reactions - Trump expressed confidence that Ukraine could "win back all territories" and restore its original borders, describing Russia as a "paper tiger" facing economic difficulties [3][4]. - Ukrainian President Zelensky found Trump's comments surprising and viewed them as a major shift, indicating closer alignment between Ukraine and the U.S. [3][4]. - European officials welcomed Trump's statements, highlighting their strength and the potential for a unified stance against Russia [3][4]. Group 2: Media and Expert Analysis - Western media noted that Trump's reversal is not unprecedented, pointing out his previous pressure on Ukraine to concede territory for a ceasefire [4][6]. - Analysts suggest that Trump's comments may reflect a strategy to leverage the conflict for U.S. economic interests, particularly in arms sales to Europe [6][7]. - There is skepticism regarding the sincerity and effectiveness of Trump's statements, with some questioning what concrete actions he would take to support Ukraine [7][8]. Group 3: Russia's Response - Russian officials, including spokesperson Peskov, rejected Trump's characterization of Russia as a "paper tiger," asserting that Russia is a "real bear" and emphasizing its commitment to its military operations [5][9]. - Peskov acknowledged economic challenges in Russia but attributed them to Western sanctions and global economic conditions, asserting that Russia's economy has adapted to the ongoing conflict [5][9]. Group 4: Implications for NATO and Future Actions - Trump's ambiguous responses regarding NATO's potential military actions against Russia raise questions about his commitment to collective defense [8]. - The ongoing stagnation of peace talks and the potential for increased U.S. involvement in the conflict are highlighted as critical factors influencing the situation [6][8].

Group 1 - President Putin expressed willingness to meet with Ukrainian President Zelensky if he is ready, indicating a potential opening for negotiations [1][2] - Ukrainian Foreign Minister Kuleba rejected Putin's proposal, suggesting it reflects Russia's unserious attitude towards peace and presented seven alternative countries for negotiations [2][3] - Zelensky stated that there are no signs from Russia indicating a desire to end the war, emphasizing the need for allies to increase pressure on Russia for a diplomatic solution [3][6] Group 2 - The "Volunteer Alliance" meeting in France aimed to establish strong security guarantees for Ukraine, with European leaders participating [4] - There appears to be a lack of consensus among European nations regarding military commitments, particularly from Germany, which has stated it will not deploy troops to Ukraine [4][5] - Russian officials criticized the security guarantees proposed by Ukraine as unacceptable, claiming they pose a threat to European security rather than providing it [5] Group 3 - Trump indicated a willingness to reconsider the U.S. stance on Russia, suggesting potential changes in approach if negotiations do not yield results [7] - Russian officials expressed skepticism about Trump's statements, viewing them as rhetorical rather than substantive, while also highlighting the risks of U.S. military aid to Ukraine [7]

当地时间7月4日，俄总统新闻秘书佩斯科夫在简报会上就俄美总统通话表示，俄方认真对待特朗普的所 有表态。佩斯科夫说，普京在通话中重申，俄方致力于在特别军事行动中实现目标并有意优先通过政治 外交手段解决问题。但在目前尚不具备以政治外交手段实现目标的情况下，俄罗斯继续推进特别军事行 动。普京还向美方通报，俄方期待尽快确定俄乌第三轮谈判的具体日期。佩斯科夫表示，俄美两国元首 的会晤是有必要的，但必须做好充分准备。佩斯科夫还说，普京目前没有计划与阿富汗临时政府领导层 接触，但俄阿双方将在各个层面建立联系。佩斯科夫还称，俄海军节庆祝活动安排待确认后将由克宫通 报。(央视新闻) ...

Core Insights - Ukraine's President Zelensky has imposed sanctions on companies involved in the production of Russian drones [1] - Russian President Putin stated that Russia does not rule out attempts to occupy the Sumy region, emphasizing that the situation in Ukraine is different from that in Iran, as Russia does not seek Ukraine's surrender [1] - The Russian Ministry of Defense reported that Russian armed forces have "liberated" the town of Moskalky in the Kharkiv region, claiming to have "liberated" six settlements within a week [1] - The Kremlin indicated that dialogue with Ukraine is ongoing, expecting to agree on the date for the next round of talks next week, while refusing to predict the possibility of a meeting between Trump and Putin this year [1]

Core Viewpoint - The Kremlin expresses difficulty in predicting the Ukrainian regime's actions, emphasizing a preference for achieving goals through diplomatic means while continuing the "special military operation" [1] Group 1 - The Kremlin's stance indicates a complex geopolitical situation regarding Ukraine, highlighting the uncertainty in forecasting the regime's future actions [1] - There is a clear intention from the Kremlin to pursue diplomatic avenues, suggesting a potential for negotiations despite ongoing military operations [1] - The continuation of the "special military operation" reflects a commitment to military engagement, indicating that the situation remains tense and unresolved [1]

Core Viewpoint - The Russian government is reportedly considering a controversial plan to recruit students who fail their courses into military service, raising concerns about the implications for education and military recruitment in the country [1][5][30]. Group 1: Recruitment Plan - Students at Ural Federal University are facing a choice between expulsion or signing a military contract to participate in the "special military operation" [1][2]. - This initiative is not limited to Ural Federal University; universities across Sverdlovsk Oblast have received similar communications from the regional education department [2]. - The plan appears to be a local government initiative rather than a formal policy, as it is not mandatory for students [5][6]. Group 2: Public Reaction and Implications - The proposal has sparked outrage among students and the public, with some media outlets labeling it a "scandal" [6][12]. - The Ural Federal University has expressed dissatisfaction with the plan, emphasizing its role in training skilled professionals for the economy rather than military recruitment [13][14]. - The effectiveness of this recruitment strategy is questionable, as many students facing expulsion may not value their degrees highly enough to risk their lives for them [14][21]. Group 3: Military Recruitment Context - The Russian military is reportedly struggling with recruitment, relying increasingly on rural populations and those in poverty to fill its ranks [22][24]. - The average monthly salary for contract soldiers is over 200,000 rubles (approximately 20,000 RMB), with additional one-time compensation for volunteers [25]. - The government faces significant financial burdens due to military expenditures, which amount to approximately 11 trillion rubles annually [29]. Group 4: Historical Context and Future Outlook - Previous military mobilizations have caused widespread fear and uncertainty among the population, with students often seeking higher education as a means to avoid conscription [32][36]. - If the current trend of military recruitment continues, students who fail their courses may become direct targets for future mobilizations [34][38].

Core Viewpoint - The Russian Ministry of Defense announced that with the end of the ceasefire, the Russian military will continue its "special military operation" [1] Group 1 - The announcement indicates a shift in military strategy following the cessation of hostilities [1] - The term "special military operation" suggests a prolonged engagement rather than a short-term conflict [1]

Group 1 - The core viewpoint of the article is that the situation in the special military operation zone is favorable for Russia [1] Group 2 - The article highlights the strategic advantages that Russia perceives in the ongoing military operations [1] - It suggests that the current developments may bolster Russia's position in the region [1] - The commentary reflects a broader narrative of confidence from Russian leadership regarding military objectives [1]