始祖鸟和艺术家蔡国强在喜马拉雅山用烟花秀"炸山"，这是打着"敬畏自然"的旗号在破坏自然。有评论说，它不仅破坏土壤、惊扰动物、震动 冰川，更强暴了高原，表现出一种无知和傲慢。 一些品牌表面宣传的环保主义，其实，心里全是生意。环保、艺术、商业，如果平衡得不好，会适得其反。如果缺少对自然真正的尊重，即便 口号与烟火爆破一样响亮，也是一种恶俗。 今天，有"鸟人"（"鸟粉"爱称）穿着一身昂贵的始祖鸟出门，结果在街上被人指指点点，"喏，就这牌子，炸了喜马拉雅山"，他掏出手机一看，惊出一身 冷汗。 （图/社交媒体截图） 9月19日傍晚，始祖鸟（ARC'TERYX）和艺术家蔡国强在西藏日喀则市江孜热龙地区（海拔约5500米）的喜马拉雅山脉整了个大活儿，玩了把火。一场 号称"向上致美"的《升龙》烟花艺术秀，沿着山脊，用145根扇形彩烟嘭-嘭-嘭炸出一条长达3公里的蓝白红绿黄色"长龙"，主办方说这是寓意东方龙文化 的"吉祥"与"生生不息"。 （图/《升龙》视频截图） 尽管主办方宣称使用了"生物可降解环保材料"，并有一套"预防-监测-恢复"的生态保护方案，却遭到大范围质疑，"在高原生态这么脆弱的地方炸山，是谁 给的勇气？""这哪是 ...

Core Viewpoint - Germany's electricity generation has significantly declined due to a combination of factors, including a drastic reduction in coal-fired power generation and the complete phase-out of nuclear power, leading to concerns about the country's industrial capacity and energy security [6][27][38]. Group 1: Electricity Generation Trends - In 2000, Germany's electricity generation was 576.54 billion kWh, peaking at 653.72 billion kWh in 2017, but has since been on a downward trend [3][8]. - By 2024, Germany's total electricity generation is projected to be 497.29 billion kWh, a year-on-year decrease of 3.0%, ranking it only 10th globally [6][8]. - From 2017 to 2023, Germany's electricity generation decreased by 21.7% [8]. Group 2: Decline in Coal-Fired Power - Coal-fired power generation in Germany dropped from 3,145.55 billion kWh in 2003, accounting for 51.63% of total generation, to only 1,348.92 billion kWh in 2023, representing a decline of 57.12% and only 26.4% of total generation [10][12]. - The German government aims to eliminate coal power by 2038, with some political factions pushing for an even earlier phase-out by 2030 [12][13]. Group 3: Nuclear Power Phase-Out - Germany has completely phased out nuclear power, with the last three nuclear plants shut down in April 2023, which previously contributed about 6% of the country's electricity generation [27][28]. - The anti-nuclear sentiment in Germany has historical roots, stemming from safety concerns and major nuclear accidents, leading to a long-standing opposition to nuclear energy [31][34]. Group 4: Economic Implications - The decline in electricity generation raises concerns about Germany's industrial capacity, as a significant reduction in energy supply could hinder its ability to produce goods competitively [38]. - The high cost of electricity generation, exemplified by the closure of the efficient Moorburg coal power plant due to economic unviability, highlights the challenges faced by the energy sector [26][21].

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the historical reflection and transformation of Germany post-World War II, emphasizing the role of education and public discourse in shaping a more peaceful and democratic society, as explored in the book "Rebuilding Civilization: Fifty Years of Postwar Germany" by Conrad H. J. Yalowsh [1][4]. Group 1: Historical Transformation - Yalowsh identifies three historical phases in Germany's transformation: the immediate post-war period focused on dismantling Nazi influence, the 1960s aimed at integrating with Western nations and fostering a more inclusive society, and the 1990s which centered on establishing a new identity and maintaining an open cultural environment [3][4]. - The process of denazification involved significant public engagement, including a comprehensive questionnaire distributed to Germans to assess their involvement with the Nazi regime, which was crucial for employment opportunities post-war [5]. Group 2: Role of Education and Media - The influence of Western occupying forces on German education policies was profound, promoting anti-war, pacifist, and reflective approaches to Nazi history [1][4]. - Media played a critical role in reshaping public consciousness, with the emergence of newspapers and radio stations that advocated for open-mindedness and cultural reform, significantly impacting the German populace's mindset [5]. Group 3: Environmental Awareness and Youth Movements - The post-war generation of German youth began to resist authority, leading to significant social movements in the 1960s, which laid the groundwork for environmental consciousness and activism [6][7]. - The environmental movement gained momentum in response to industrial pollution and nuclear concerns, culminating in the rise of the Green Party in the 1980s, which marked a shift towards sustainable development in German society [8][9].

Core Viewpoint - Vaclav Smil argues that economic growth should not be pursued unconditionally, as it relies on complex logistics rather than mere technological advancements, and that the current food production system is capable of meeting human needs, but waste and mismanagement are significant issues [1][4][5] Group 1: Economic Growth and Environmentalism - Smil critiques extreme environmentalists' doomsday rhetoric, suggesting that the focus should be on food waste rather than dietary restrictions [4][5] - He emphasizes that the current food production can provide 3000 kilocalories per person daily, with one-third of food wasted, highlighting the inefficiency in food distribution rather than production [4][5] - The book discusses the importance of agriculture as the foundation of human society, arguing that alternative food sources cannot replace traditional farming [4][6] Group 2: Food Production and Consumption - Smil's new book addresses the potential dangers of trendy diets that neglect traditional agriculture, warning that such trends could lead to future food shortages [5][6] - He provides data on the caloric needs of adults, arguing that low-carb diets could jeopardize food security if widely adopted [5][6] - The book explores the historical reliance on agriculture over hunting, citing anthropological studies that show the limitations of foraging for sustaining large populations [4][6] Group 3: Class and Food Security - Smil raises concerns about the disconnect between wealthy individuals' dietary choices and the food security needs of the larger population, suggesting that environmentalism often overlooks the basic needs of the poor [8][9] - He critiques the notion that organic farming is inherently better for the environment, pointing out that it often cannot meet the demand compared to conventional farming [8][9] - The discussion includes the economic implications of agricultural labor, noting that a significant portion of the population is engaged in agriculture, yet it remains undervalued compared to other sectors [8][9]

Core Viewpoint - The article highlights the significant growth of Chinese automotive exports, particularly in the electric vehicle (EV) sector, with a projected export of 6.407 million vehicles in 2024, marking a 22.7% year-on-year increase, and a 6.7% increase in new energy vehicle exports [1][2]. Group 1: Market Dynamics - The rise of environmentalism in developed countries has made low-carbon new energy vehicles increasingly popular, while developing countries have a strong demand for high-cost performance products [3][4]. - BYD has created a new incremental market by leveraging new energy and intelligent technology, catering to both environmental concerns and transportation needs [4][10]. Group 2: Technological Advancements - The rapid release of technological dividends from BYD's extensive R&D efforts has led to significant sales growth in Europe, with countries like the UK, Spain, and Portugal seeing year-on-year increases of 551%, 734%, and 207% respectively [7][8]. - BYD's e-platform offers significant advantages over traditional fuel vehicles in terms of energy efficiency, space layout, and cost, with electric motors achieving over 90% efficiency compared to 30-40% for fuel engines [9]. Group 3: Competitive Strategy - BYD's vertical integration strategy allows for self-research and production across the entire supply chain, resulting in lower costs and higher efficiency, which is crucial for competing in local markets [13][14]. - Localized production enables BYD to offer a diverse product range, from economical to mid-to-high-end vehicles, enhancing its competitiveness in various markets [14][15]. Group 4: Brand Perception - The success of BYD in overseas markets reflects a shift in perception of Chinese automotive brands, which are now seen as manufacturers of high-value technology products rather than low-quality, low-cost providers [17].