Group 1 - The Indian Ministry of Defense is initiating a comprehensive military procurement review to identify Chinese components in military equipment and assess vulnerabilities in the defense supply chain [1] - The Indian Army aims to eliminate Chinese components from its suppliers, emphasizing the reduction of foreign dependency, particularly on China, as a key priority for addressing potential security risks [1] - Recent investigations revealed that some suppliers may have exaggerated the number of domestic components, with critical parts often traceable to China, especially in sensitive areas like drones and anti-drone systems [1] Group 2 - As part of a comprehensive reform plan for 2025, the Indian Ministry of Defense may appoint an external agency to verify domestic production rates, map supply chain dependencies, and evaluate cost structures and technology transfer processes [3] - Following the discovery of Chinese components in military equipment, the Indian Ministry of Defense canceled a drone procurement order citing national security risks, indicating that more defense hardware may require strict inspections to ensure compliance with safety standards [3] - The Ministry of Defense has accelerated procurement processes and intensified scrutiny of suppliers potentially using Chinese components in frontline equipment amid rising tensions with Pakistan [3] Group 3 - The Indian government has decided to terminate a $23 billion Production-Linked Incentive (PLI) scheme aimed at boosting domestic manufacturing, which was intended to increase manufacturing's share in the economy to 25% by 2025 [4] - The PLI scheme, launched four years ago, had around 750 companies, including major players like Foxconn and Reliance Industries, signing up, but many failed to start production or faced slow subsidy payments [5] - As of October 2024, participating companies produced goods worth $151.93 billion under the PLI scheme, achieving only 37% of the set target, with the government disbursing just $1.73 billion in incentives, less than 8% of the allocated funds [5]