Core Viewpoint - The article emphasizes that laws should not only serve as tools for post-event accountability but should also act as proactive safeguards for ecological protection. It argues that government approval powers must align with ecological responsibilities and foresight [1][4]. Group 1: Event Overview - The fireworks display in the Himalayas, branded as a tribute to nature, ended with apologies and investigations due to public backlash over its ecological impact [1]. - The event took place at a sensitive ecological site in Tibet, raising concerns about the environmental consequences despite claims of using biodegradable materials [1][2]. Group 2: Public and Regulatory Response - Initial criticism focused on the commercial logic of the event, questioning how a brand that promotes respect for nature could sponsor such an environmentally damaging display [2]. - Public scrutiny shifted towards local regulatory bodies, questioning the compliance of the event's approval process and the adequacy of environmental assessments in sensitive areas like the Tibetan Plateau [3]. Group 3: Legal and Environmental Implications - The article highlights a gap between outdated views of compliance equating to safety and modern environmental governance that emphasizes prevention and holistic approaches [4]. - It stresses that all commercial activities, including artistic expressions, must adhere to ecological protection obligations as established by legal principles [3][4]. Group 4: Societal Reflection and Future Directions - The controversy surrounding the fireworks event reflects a broader societal need to shift from anthropocentrism to ecocentrism, recognizing humanity as part of the natural community [4]. - The article advocates for increased public awareness and action towards ecological protection, suggesting that this incident could serve as a turning point for sustainable development practices [4].