今年是"两山"理念提出20周年。在这个重要的时间点，笔者带领厦门大学环境与生态学院、马克思主义学院、经济学院三院学生共赴"两山"理念诞生地—— 浙江余村，让高校学生实地感受"两山"理念的魅力。笔者深深体会到，余村转型实践充分证明了，"两山"理念是破解两个"中心主义"困境的"金钥匙"。 至此，余村更加坚定了走生态环境治理之路的决心，拆除违法建筑，建立集中工业区，清理溪道。生态环境逐步恢复了，游客也逐渐多了，于是漂流、农家 乐等项目也发展起来，相应也带动了笋干、茶叶、土鸡等农产品销售。村民真正感受到了绿水青山带来的实惠，于是自愿拿出更多的资金自发组建生态护卫 队，投入生态环境保护之中，保护好绿水青山这个"命根子"。 如今的余村还充分发挥辐射作用，携手两乡共计24村统筹发展推进资源共享、优势互补。同时还在传统的生态环境建设基础上打造新经济、新产业，使魅力 与活力更加凸显。余村经验的溢出效应开启了浙江乃至中国乡村振兴的壮阔图景，万千村落正循着余村的足迹，将生态优势转化为发展动能，成功走出了一 条条生态美、产业兴、百姓富的绿色发展之路。 两个"中心主义"的困境 人类对人与自然关系的认知过程中曾有两个"中心主义"的争论， ...

Group 1 - The core argument is that AI is fundamentally changing societal structures, rendering traditional measures of self-worth, such as education and job titles, less relevant as AI can perform tasks at a fraction of the cost and with significantly higher efficiency [1][18][21] - The discussion around AI has shifted from "what to do" in response to job displacement to "how to perceive" the broader implications of AI on society [2][11] - AI's efficiency in performing intelligent tasks is projected to be thousands of times greater than that of humans, leading to a complete reshaping of social, familial, and political structures [3][18][21] Group 2 - The concept of "emergence" suggests that simple rules can lead to complex phenomena when applied at a large scale, which is applicable to both human and AI intelligence [14][15] - The "human equivalent" principle indicates that AI can produce intellectual output at a cost significantly lower than human labor, with AI capable of processing vast amounts of data rapidly [16][17] - The "algorithmic judgment" principle posits that as AI becomes more prevalent, the economic and social structures will shift, potentially leading to a widening gap between those who control AI resources and those who do not [22][26] Group 3 - The potential for a "species-level" divide between the 1% who control AI and the 99% who do not could lead to significant societal challenges, including the risk of economic and existential marginalization for the majority [26][27] - Proposed governance structures include Universal Basic Income (UBI) to address survival needs, Universal Basic Jobs (UBG) to provide a sense of purpose, and algorithmic distribution to ensure equitable resource allocation [27][29][30] - The emergence of a "civilization contract" between humans and superintelligent AI raises questions about the nature of justice and the moral implications of AI governance [40][41][48]

Group 1 - The article discusses the rapid consumption and production of text in the AI era, which has finally caught up with short videos [2] - It highlights the challenges of AI detection, noting that many comments attempting to identify AI-generated content failed to recognize the author's own writing [5][7] - The author emphasizes that AI can effectively mimic writing styles, leading to confusion about what constitutes the "real" author [8][9] Group 2 - The article argues that AI detection is largely pointless, as the value of content lies in its information and insights rather than its origin [10][12] - It suggests that the focus should be on the reliability of information sources and the accuracy of factual statements, rather than whether content is AI-generated [21] - The author points out that in journalism, AI can enhance the speed of producing genuine news articles, challenging the notion that only human-generated content is valuable [18][20] Group 3 - In academia, the article asserts that the core value of research papers lies in their reproducibility and innovation, rather than the method of writing [22][23] - It argues that using AI tools in writing does not diminish the academic value of a paper if the research is sound and replicable [23] - The article also discusses the perception of AI-generated content in the humanities, emphasizing that the originality of ideas is what matters most [24] Group 4 - The article notes a societal bias against AI-generated content, where people often prefer human-created works until they learn the content is AI-generated [31][32] - It highlights that this bias stems from a human-centric perspective, leading to a social evaluation penalty for those using AI tools [36][37] - The author suggests that the act of identifying AI content has become a social performance, enhancing one's status in social media contexts [38][39] Group 5 - The article concludes that while substantive AI detection may decline, the social behavior of identifying AI will persist as a cultural phenomenon [41][47] - It posits that the distinction between human and AI-generated content will blur, shifting the focus to the quality and utility of the content itself [44][46] - The ongoing tension between human creativity and technological advancement is highlighted as a fundamental aspect of modern existence [48]

Core Perspective - Annika Yi's artistic practice merges technology and biology, challenging traditional boundaries of visual art and exploring the fragile yet resilient relationships among all forms of life [1][2] Group 1: Artistic Approach - Yi incorporates sensory dimensions such as touch, taste, and smell into her work, prompting audiences to reconsider humanity's position within the interconnected ecosystem [1] - Her art questions human-centric views by integrating non-human entities like mechanical devices, fungi, and algae, leading to reflections on subjectivity and control in the creative process [1] Group 2: Thematic Exploration - The exhibition features nearly 40 selected works designed to evoke a sterile, futuristic atmosphere reminiscent of laboratories or spacecraft, highlighting themes of loss and separation [2] - Yi's works delve into societal obsessions with cleanliness and pollution, using the transient nature of her art to enhance psychological tension among viewers [2] - The exploration of bacterial growth and pathogen invasion serves as a metaphor for societal change and individual transformation, suggesting a dynamic relationship influenced by advancements in artificial intelligence [2]