据报道，在腾讯2025年度员工大会上，腾讯创始人马化腾在公司年会上提到了字节和中兴手机联合推出 的豆包手机，表示，腾讯一贯旗帜鲜明地反对用黑产外挂的方式把用户的手机和电脑屏幕录屏传到云 端，因为这是"极其不安全""不负责任的"。 对此，豆包手机助手在微博发文称，我们理解外界对于手机助手安全与隐私的关注。豆包手机助手严格 遵循用户授权与合规的原则，仅在用户明确授权的前提下调用必要能力。此外，豆包手机助手在云端处 理用户手机屏幕内容时，严格遵循 "不存储、不训练"的原则，数据传输过程加密，使用过程有严格的 保护措施，确保用户隐私安全。 据报道，在腾讯2025年度员工大会上，腾讯创始人马化腾在公司年会上提到了字节和中兴手机联合推出 的豆包手机，表示，腾讯一贯旗帜鲜明地反对用黑产外挂的方式把用户的手机和电脑屏幕录屏传到云 端，因为这是"极其不安全""不负责任的"。 对此，豆包手机助手在微博发文称，我们理解外界对于手机助手安全与隐私的关注。豆包手机助手严格 遵循用户授权与合规的原则，仅在用户明确授权的前提下调用必要能力。此外，豆包手机助手在云端处 理用户手机屏幕内容时，严格遵循 "不存储、不训练"的原则，数据传输过程加 ...

Core Viewpoint - Doubao Mobile Assistant responded to allegations of user privacy infringement, asserting that it does not engage in any hacking activities and that the INJECT_EVENTS feature relies on system-level permissions with strict usage limitations [1] Group 1: Privacy and Security - Doubao Mobile Assistant requires users to actively authorize the use of system-level permissions, ensuring that sensitive operations such as authorization, payment, and identity verification are paused for user intervention [1] - The company claims that it does not store any user screen content in the cloud, and such content will not be used for model training, thereby ensuring user privacy [1] Group 2: Product Positioning - Doubao Mobile Assistant is currently in a "technical preview" phase, aimed at industry professionals and AI technology enthusiasts, with innovative features and interactions that lack clear industry consensus [1] - The company emphasizes that this product is not intended for ordinary consumers, as stated in their official video and sales website [1]

Core Viewpoint - Google's Privacy Sandbox initiative, aimed at phasing out third-party cookies, has ultimately failed due to low adoption rates and industry resistance, leading to the decision to discontinue technologies like Topics [1][3] Group 1: Background and Initial Intent - Google announced in the summer of 2021 its plan to eliminate third-party cookies in Chrome to address user demands for transparency and privacy [3] - The Privacy Sandbox project was intended to reshape advertising privacy standards, as cookies, a technology from the 1990s, were increasingly seen as misaligned with their original purpose [3][4] Group 2: Industry Reaction and Opposition - The announcement of the Privacy Sandbox faced significant backlash from various stakeholders, including competitors like Microsoft and community organizations such as GitHub and the Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) [7] - The opposition stemmed from concerns that eliminating third-party cookies would disrupt the internet advertising ecosystem, potentially harming businesses reliant on advertising revenue [7][8] Group 3: Implementation Challenges - The core idea of the Privacy Sandbox was to keep advertising data local to the browser, preventing direct access by advertisers while allowing Chrome to inform advertisers about user preferences [8][10] - However, during testing, advertisers reported issues with precision in targeting, and websites expressed concerns about reduced revenue [8][10] Group 4: Trust and Long-term Implications - There is skepticism regarding Google's intentions, given its dominant market share in browsers, which could lead to a lack of trust among advertisers and websites if they cannot access specific user data [10] - The closure of the Privacy Sandbox project reflects a broader trend where internet participants prioritize their immediate interests over collaborative efforts to create a healthier online ecosystem, indicating a decline in mutual trust [10]

Core Viewpoint - NetEase Cloud Music has officially stated that it does not have a "visitor record" feature, ensuring that user privacy is maintained during interactions on the platform [1][4]. Group 1 - Multiple users inquired on social media about the existence of a visitor record feature on NetEase Cloud Music, prompting the company's response [4]. - The official statement from NetEase Cloud Music confirmed that actions such as visiting user or artist profiles do not generate visitor records or any other form of tracking [1][4]. - The platform emphasizes its commitment to user privacy, adhering to principles of user awareness, consent, and minimal necessity in data protection [4]. Group 2 - In March 2024, a user raised concerns about a small eye icon on the dynamic sharing page, questioning its meaning, which indicates ongoing user interest in privacy features [4]. - A customer service representative from NetEase Cloud Music acknowledged the inquiry and mentioned that a small-scale test for dynamic view counts had been completed, but it would not be displayed further [4].

Core Points - NetEase Cloud Music has officially stated that it does not have a "visitor record" feature, ensuring that user interactions such as visiting user or artist profiles do not generate any visitor records [2][5] - The platform emphasizes its commitment to user privacy and security, adhering to principles of "user awareness, user consent, and minimum necessity" in its privacy protection policies [5] - Previous user inquiries about a potential visitor record feature have been noted, with the company indicating that any related functionalities are still under evaluation and not currently available [5]