兜兜转转四年后，谷歌为了淘汰第三方Cookie推出的隐私沙盒计划，终究还是"创业未半而中道崩殂"。 日前谷歌高管安东尼·查韦斯宣布，"在评估了行业对其预期价值的反馈，并考虑到其采用率较低后，我 们决定停用Topics等隐私沙盒技术。" 美国百货公司之父约翰·沃纳梅克有一句名言，"我知道我的广告费有一半浪费了，问题是我不知道哪一 半被浪费了"。这句在营销领域影响深远的论述，其实就反映了广告商的最大痛点，它们既无法识别消 费者是在哪个瞬间被打动，也很难追踪到是什么让大家屡次看到、但始终无感。 使用第三方Cookie持续追踪用户上网冲浪的行为，广告商也就收获了对应用户的精致画像，进而可以因 地制宜地投放广告。显而易见，大家肯定不希望自己上网冲浪时被时刻"监视"，所以用隐私沙盒淘汰第 三方Cookie，谷歌此举属于是顺应民意。 然而当时谷歌刚刚宣布了自己的决定后，业界很快便怨声四起。无论微软、Opera、Firefox等浏览器赛 道的友商，还是GitHub、电子前线基金会（EFF）等互联网社区，均不约而同地站在了他们的对立面。 那么问题就来了，为什么一个为用户隐私安全着想的方案，会受到整个业界的反对呢？ 事实上，海外 ...

Core Viewpoint - NetEase Cloud Music has officially stated that it does not have a "visitor record" feature, ensuring that user privacy is maintained during interactions on the platform [1][4]. Group 1 - Multiple users inquired on social media about the existence of a visitor record feature on NetEase Cloud Music, prompting the company's response [4]. - The official statement from NetEase Cloud Music confirmed that actions such as visiting user or artist profiles do not generate visitor records or any other form of tracking [1][4]. - The platform emphasizes its commitment to user privacy, adhering to principles of user awareness, consent, and minimal necessity in data protection [4]. Group 2 - In March 2024, a user raised concerns about a small eye icon on the dynamic sharing page, questioning its meaning, which indicates ongoing user interest in privacy features [4]. - A customer service representative from NetEase Cloud Music acknowledged the inquiry and mentioned that a small-scale test for dynamic view counts had been completed, but it would not be displayed further [4].

Core Points - NetEase Cloud Music has officially stated that it does not have a "visitor record" feature, ensuring that user interactions such as visiting user or artist profiles do not generate any visitor records [2][5] - The platform emphasizes its commitment to user privacy and security, adhering to principles of "user awareness, user consent, and minimum necessity" in its privacy protection policies [5] - Previous user inquiries about a potential visitor record feature have been noted, with the company indicating that any related functionalities are still under evaluation and not currently available [5]