近来，美团开设了算法公示专区，饿了么在恳谈会上进行算法公开和主题调研，京东承诺搭建简单 透明的补贴机制。这在一定程度上为各方提供了解平台运行逻辑的窗口，有助于打破信息壁垒。 但从整体来看，各平台算法逻辑依然复杂，标准模糊，企业在参与活动和承担费用上仍缺乏议价能 力。比如，有的平台收费和流量机制不透明，导致商户在成本分析和经营决策中处于被动地位，甚至算 不清到底有没有赚钱；有的平台通过复杂的算法，将本应自行承担的成本、运费等转嫁给商户，进一步 挤压商户的生存空间。在算法迷宫面前，商户常常面临两难抉择：要么接受规则，增收不增利；要么拒 绝参与活动，订单骤减。 必须认识到，算法公示的目的是推动行业健康发展，不能变成企业转嫁运营成本、逃避社会责任的 挡箭牌。 推动算法向上向善，不能止于规则公示，关键还得确保规则本身的合理公平。平台有责任建立更加 开放多元的共治机制，以算法公开推动算法治理，让商户、骑手、消费者能够有效表达诉求、优化体 验，助力制定更合理公正、有温度的算法规则，实现多方共赢。 算法公示不是终点，更应当助力平台构建更加公平、可持续发展的行业生态。唯有如此，平台经济 才能行稳致远，为高质量发展作出更大贡献。 ...

Group 1 - The core viewpoint of the articles emphasizes the importance of algorithm transparency and accountability in addressing the issues associated with the "black box" nature of algorithms [1][2][3] - The initiative by the Beijing Cyberspace Administration to require major platforms like Douyin, Baidu, and Meituan to disclose their algorithm rules is a significant step towards creating a transparent and fair algorithm governance system [1][2] - The social dangers of algorithm "black boxes" include the manipulation of user preferences, potential privacy violations, and the spread of harmful information, which can lead to a loss of diverse viewpoints and extreme emotional responses [1][2] Group 2 - Opening the "black box" of algorithms is essential for effective governance, as it allows for scrutiny and accountability, ensuring that algorithms are fair, reasonable, and secure [2][3] - The public disclosure of algorithms not only facilitates oversight but also encourages platforms to self-regulate and embed compliance requirements into their technical designs [2][3] - The move towards algorithm transparency represents an innovative regulatory model that enhances social, industry, and professional supervision, creating a multi-faceted governance structure involving government oversight, corporate self-discipline, and public monitoring [3] Group 3 - The significance of algorithm disclosure lies in its potential to prevent and reduce social risks associated with algorithm "black boxes," offering a more efficient and cost-effective governance approach [3] - Future efforts should focus on enhancing the depth, breadth, and comprehensibility of algorithm disclosures, along with establishing robust auditing and accountability mechanisms [3] - This initiative marks a meaningful practice of applying legal thinking and methods to digital governance, contributing to the development of a high-quality digital economy and a fairer digital future for users [3]

Core Viewpoint - The recent initiative by Beijing's Cyberspace Administration to require major online platforms like Douyin, Baidu, and Meituan to disclose their algorithm rules marks a significant step towards addressing the long-criticized "black box" nature of algorithms, aiming to create a transparent, fair, and accountable algorithm governance system [1][2]. Group 1: Social Implications of Algorithm "Black Box" - The "black box" of algorithms poses serious social risks, as it subtly shapes user preferences and limits exposure to diverse viewpoints, leading to a phenomenon known as the "information cocoon" [1]. - Users may suffer from unfair pricing strategies like "big data price discrimination," where personalized pricing can lead to higher costs for individuals [1]. - The "black box" can also exacerbate the spread of harmful information, such as online rumors and violence, as algorithms often prioritize sensational and emotional content to maximize user engagement [1]. Group 2: Importance of Algorithm Disclosure - Opening the "black box" is essential for governance, as platforms have previously used "technical confidentiality" as a shield against regulation and social oversight [2]. - Public disclosure of algorithms compels platforms to evaluate the fairness, reasonableness, and safety of their algorithms, embedding compliance requirements into their technical designs [2]. - Transparency is a prerequisite for accountability; without disclosure, regulatory bodies cannot effectively hold platforms accountable for discriminatory or unjust outcomes [2]. Group 3: Innovative Regulatory Model - Algorithm disclosure represents an innovative regulatory approach that allows for deeper regulatory engagement, addressing the challenges posed by rapidly evolving and complex algorithm technologies [3]. - This model facilitates early intervention to prevent and mitigate social risks associated with the "black box," offering a more cost-effective and efficient governance strategy [3]. - The initiative opens avenues for social, industry, and expert oversight, creating a multi-faceted governance framework that includes government regulation, corporate self-discipline, industry autonomy, and public supervision [3]. Group 4: Future Directions - While algorithm disclosure is a starting point, further efforts are needed to enhance the depth, breadth, and comprehensibility of disclosures, along with establishing auditing and accountability mechanisms [3]. - This initiative is a valuable practice in applying legal thinking and methods to digital governance, marking a solid step towards improving the digital governance system and supporting high-quality development of the digital economy [3].