经济掠夺
Search documents
两岸观察丨民进党当局“跪美”的结局与“卖台”的真相
Xin Lang Cai Jing· 2026-01-19 12:00
Core Viewpoint - The recent trade agreement between the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) of Taiwan and the United States, which includes a reduction of tariffs on Taiwanese goods from 20% to 15%, is perceived as a significant compromise that undermines Taiwan's core industrial advantages, particularly in the semiconductor sector [1][3][5]. Group 1: Economic Impact - The agreement requires Taiwan to invest a total of $500 billion, with $250 billion in direct investments and $250 billion in credit guarantees, while also mandating the transfer of 40% of its semiconductor production capacity to the U.S. [1][3][10]. - The semiconductor industry, which is crucial for Taiwan's economy, is at risk as the agreement could lead to a significant loss of economic control, with potential consequences including the collapse of upstream and downstream enterprises and widespread unemployment [5][6][8]. - The profit margins for semiconductor manufacturing in the U.S. are drastically lower, with TSMC's margins dropping from 62% in Taiwan to just 8% in the U.S., making the investment economically unfeasible [3][5]. Group 2: Political and Social Reactions - The DPP's handling of the negotiations has been criticized as a "black box operation," leading to public dissatisfaction and accusations of selling out Taiwan's industrial base [6][10]. - The agreement is seen as a strategic move by the U.S. to consolidate its technological dominance while using Taiwan as a pawn in its geopolitical strategy against China [12][16]. - There is a growing sentiment that the DPP's reliance on the U.S. for economic support is detrimental, as it may lead to the hollowing out of Taiwan's industries and a loss of national pride associated with its semiconductor capabilities [8][16]. Group 3: Future Considerations - Experts suggest that the only viable solution for Taiwan's semiconductor industry is to deepen cooperation with mainland China, which could provide a more sustainable path for growth [14][16]. - The current trajectory of Taiwan's economic policy, characterized by a desire for independence and reliance on the U.S., is likely to exacerbate the challenges faced by its semiconductor sector and overall economy [16].
岛内舆论担忧台积电变“美积电” 国台办回应
21世纪经济报道· 2026-01-14 03:23
来源丨新华社 发言人朱凤莲答问表示,所谓的协议是美国以高关税为手段,对台湾实施的经济掠夺,是一场 对台湾产业抽血的图谋。这不仅暴露了美国"美国优先"的利己本性,更暴露出美国将台湾视为 棋子的险恶用心。民进党当局面对外部势力明目张胆的霸凌和掠夺,不仅毫不抵制,反而主动 迎合把岛内核心技术优势当作向外部势力献媚的投名状,在关税谈判中"未谈先跪",在经济勒 索前"打左脸送右脸",卖身券越谈越多,最终只会摧毁台湾经济发展前景,损害台湾民众长远 利益。 1月14日,国务院台办举行例行新闻发布会。有记者问,美国《纽约时报》近日报道称,美国 与台湾接近达成贸易协议,美对台进口关税将降至15%,台积电在美将再投资兴建至少5座半 导体厂。岛内人士及舆论纷纷质疑民进党当局以投资换关税,会导致半导体精锐产能移往美 国,台积电变"美积电"。对此有何评论? ...
铁蹄踏琼岛 血泪鉴山河
Hai Nan Ri Bao· 2025-09-04 01:53
Core Viewpoint - The article highlights the historical atrocities committed by Japanese forces during their occupation of Hainan Island, emphasizing the immense suffering and loss experienced by the local population over 80 years ago [14][19]. Historical Atrocities - Japanese forces invaded Hainan Island in February 1939, leading to widespread violence, including the bombing of towns and the execution of civilians [15][16]. - The occupation resulted in numerous massacres, with over 200 villagers killed in the "Three-One Massacre" and a total of 566,174 casualties recorded during the occupation [20][23]. - The Japanese military employed brutal tactics, including the "Three Alls" policy (burn all, kill all, loot all), leading to the destruction of entire villages and communities [20][21]. Cultural and Economic Exploitation - The Japanese implemented a cultural invasion through education, establishing 73 Japanese language schools and promoting propaganda to indoctrinate the local population [21][22]. - Economically, Japan exploited Hainan's natural resources, particularly iron ore, with significant quantities extracted and shipped back to Japan, including 41,000 tons from Shiluo Iron Mine and 241,000 tons from Tiandu Iron Mine [22][23]. - The total financial loss due to the occupation was estimated at 80,907,270 yuan (1937 currency), alongside the forced labor of over 200,000 local workers, with a high casualty rate of 60% among them [23].