作为一个曾为世界贡献了鹞式战机的国家，今天英国已无法独立制造一架完整的现代战斗机。 这不仅是航空工业的困境，也是英国高端制造、传统产业乃至新兴领域竞争力整体下滑的缩影。 《星船知造》本文想讨论的是，以英国工业衰退为例，可以清晰看到：新全球化时代下，食利国家正在经历的、向自身真实水平的均值回归。 英国昔日的工业强盛，其根基并非来自胼手胝足、共建家园的集体奋斗。而更多依赖于从殖民历史到金融霸权所构建的全球寻租体系。 当各阶层普遍沉醉于依赖寻租的发展模式所带来的巨额利润与体面——工业衰落的种子就一并种下。 这种建立在非洲和东印度累累白骨之上的"体面"，又常与英伦风情、绅士风度等符号绑定，被包装成一种高级文化商品行销世界。赢两次。 它从根本上削弱了一个国家投身长期艰苦建设的意愿与能力。 当国家的财富积累并非源于实干与创造，衰退的种子就在工业体系里生根发芽。 结出的恶果已在今天英国工业各领域加速显现。 工业的衰退又必然伴随着产业的自主可控、国家战略的独立与完整，也一并悄然旁落。 大国就在不知不觉中丧失了主导自身命运的能力。 《星船知造》在《欧洲，又一个寒冷的暖冬》中写过—— 为了补上自俄罗斯管道输入的能源缺口，英国和欧 ...

Group 1 - The recent trade agreement between South Korea and the United States has not alleviated concerns in South Korea regarding its implementation and potential impacts [1][6] - South Korea's Minister of Trade, Industry and Energy expressed worries about the 15% tariff rate affecting exporters' profitability, despite the agreement avoiding the worst-case scenario [1][3] - The "MASGA" project, aimed at enhancing U.S. shipbuilding capabilities, is seen as a significant overseas expansion for South Korea's manufacturing sector, but it faces numerous challenges [2][3] Group 2 - The shipbuilding cooperation between South Korea and the U.S. involves a $150 billion investment, but the project is complicated by the need to establish or upgrade local shipyards and develop skilled labor [2][3] - Concerns have been raised about the potential transfer of high-end technical talent and production capacity from South Korea to the U.S. as a result of the agreement [3][4] - The automotive industry is also affected, with South Korean cars now subject to a 15% tariff, raising concerns about the competitiveness of South Korean exports compared to Japanese vehicles [3][4] Group 3 - The $3.5 billion investment figure mentioned in the agreement is seen as excessively large, prompting calls for government support to help domestic industries adapt [4] - The upcoming summit between South Korean and U.S. leaders is expected to address unresolved economic issues, including non-tariff barriers that could pressure South Korea for further concessions [5][6] - Experts warn that the trade agreement merely outlines a broad framework, with key issues in agriculture, digital services, and other sectors remaining unresolved [6]

Core Viewpoint - The recent "US-EU Century Agreement" has stirred significant controversy within Europe, raising questions about the unity and future of the EU as member states react differently to the implications of the deal [1][3]. Group 1: Agreement Details - The agreement involves a reduction of tariffs to 15%, which, while appearing beneficial compared to the previously threatened 30%, comes with a requirement for Europe to purchase $750 billion worth of US energy over three years [3][5]. - The deal has been characterized as a "Trump-style plunder" by some European leaders, indicating a perception of exploitation rather than mutual benefit [5]. Group 2: Economic Impact - Germany's GDP is projected to decrease by 0.15% due to the agreement, with energy costs expected to rise by 40%, suggesting that the financial implications may not be favorable for European economies [5][7]. - The agreement has created a divide among EU member states, with some countries feeling sidelined and expressing concerns over sovereignty and economic independence [7][9]. Group 3: Geopolitical Implications - The internal discord within the EU may lead to fragmentation, as countries like France and Italy openly criticize the agreement, while others like Germany find themselves in a complicated position due to their reliance on US energy [7][12]. - The situation presents potential opportunities for China, as the rift between the US and Europe may allow for increased cooperation between China and European nations, particularly in green and high-end manufacturing sectors [10][14]. Group 4: Future Outlook - The EU is expected to experience further internal disputes regarding the agreement, with potential modifications being discussed by key member states [12][14]. - Long-term, the relationship between the US and Europe may not remain as tightly bound as the agreement suggests, with the possibility of a return to strategic autonomy for European nations [14][16].

Group 1 - The core viewpoint is that Japan's reliance on the U.S. and its strategic miscalculations are leading to significant economic and geopolitical challenges, while the integration with China's economy presents a potential path for recovery [1][2][4][12] - Over 32,000 Japanese companies in China, with 78% stating they will not withdraw, indicate a strong commitment to the Chinese market, as seen in the actions of companies like Shiseido and Toyota [1] - Japan's automotive industry faces severe threats from both Chinese electric vehicle competition and U.S. tariffs, with a projected trade deficit with China reaching $42.4 billion in 2024 [2][6] Group 2 - Japan's economic structure is deteriorating, with a significant reliance on the U.S. leading to unfavorable trade agreements, exemplified by the humiliating terms of the U.S.-Japan tariff negotiations [6] - The Japanese government is increasing its defense budget, with plans to deploy advanced military capabilities in response to perceived threats from China, reflecting a shift in its defense strategy [9] - The potential for economic revitalization exists through deeper integration with East Asia, particularly through the RCEP and a proposed free trade agreement among China, Japan, and South Korea, which could unlock significant market opportunities [12]

Group 1 - The signing of the $550 billion US-Japan trade agreement is seen as a significant event that could have a domino effect on the global economy, with potential implications for international trade dynamics [1][3] - The agreement includes a reduction of tariffs on Japanese goods from a threatened 25% to 15%, but this still poses challenges for Japanese industries, particularly the automotive sector [4][5] - Japanese farmers are expected to face severe competition from US agricultural products, particularly rice, which could capture 10% of the Japanese market due to price advantages [5][9] Group 2 - The agreement has been compared to the 1985 Plaza Accord, indicating a potential crisis of industrial hollowing out in Japan as a result of capital outflow and market opening [7] - The deal's implications extend beyond the US and Japan, as it may embolden the US to impose further tariffs on other developed economies, affecting global trade relations [9][11] - The Japanese government faces significant political pressure and public discontent as a result of the agreement, with farmers planning protests against the perceived negative impacts on their livelihoods [11]

Group 1 - The trade agreement between the US and Japan was reached after eight rounds of negotiations, with significant implications for both economies [1][2] - The agreement includes a reduction of tariffs on Japanese products exported to the US from 25% to 15%, and Japan will invest $550 billion in the US, with the US retaining 90% of the profits [2][4] - Japan will open its market to US products, including automobiles, rice, and other agricultural goods, which indicates a major concession from Japan [2][4] Group 2 - In the short term, the agreement is seen as a relief for Japan, particularly for its automotive industry, which exports 1.37 million vehicles to the US, accounting for 34% of Japan's total exports to the US [4] - Following the announcement, the Nikkei 225 index surged by over 800 points, closing up 1,396.40 points or 3.51%, indicating increased market confidence [4] - However, the long-term implications suggest that Japan's concessions may lead to significant fiscal pressure and potential hollowing out of domestic industries as companies shift operations to the US [4][5] Group 3 - The trade agreement may alter the competitive landscape for China, as Japan's increased imports of US agricultural products could reduce its imports from other countries, including China [7] - Japanese companies may invest more in the US to avoid tariffs, potentially decreasing their investments in China, which could impact China's related industries [7] - The strengthened supply chain cooperation between Japan and the US in sectors like semiconductors and steel may marginalize Chinese industries, leading to challenges in stability and upgrading of China's industrial chain [7][8]

Core Viewpoint - The recent 232 investigations by the U.S. extend from upstream basic materials to downstream high-tech applications and derivatives, indicating a need for vigilance in the industry [1] Group 1: Investigations Overview - The U.S. has initiated two new 232 investigations concerning "drone systems and their components" and "polysilicon and its derivatives," which began on July 1 and are currently in the public comment phase [2][3] - The investigations aim to assess the impact of these products on national security, focusing on domestic production capabilities and foreign supply chain roles [3] Group 2: Industry Implications - The products under investigation lack comparative advantages in the U.S. market, suggesting that imposing tariffs could harm domestic supply chains [1][3] - The investigations are seen as a pretext for implementing protective tariffs to promote domestic production and reduce reliance on foreign imports [3][5] Group 3: Historical Context and Future Outlook - Previous 232 investigations, such as those on steel and aluminum, followed a similar logic, where the U.S. established strategic importance for certain products and quantified the national security threats posed by imports [5][6] - The U.S. is likely to continue favoring tariff measures as a means of addressing perceived national security threats in various industries [4][5]

Group 1 - The article draws parallels between the Plaza Accord of 1985, which negatively impacted Japan's economy, and current U.S. strategies aimed at China, suggesting that the U.S. may be attempting to replicate this historical scenario [1][3][9] - The U.S. is facing significant trade deficits, particularly with China, which has emerged as a major manufacturing competitor, holding over 30% of global manufacturing value added in 2022 [5][9] - The strong dollar, driven by aggressive Federal Reserve policies, is seen as a tool to attract global capital back to the U.S. while simultaneously undermining China's economic growth [9][11] Group 2 - The appreciation of the dollar is eroding the profit margins of Chinese exporters, making it difficult for them to compete, as rising costs may lead to orders shifting to other emerging markets like Vietnam and India [7][9] - The U.S. manufacturing sector has diminished, now accounting for less than 11% of GDP, which raises questions about the sustainability of its economic strategies compared to the 1980s [9][11] - Some U.S. states are exploring alternatives to the dollar, reflecting growing concerns over federal debt and the stability of the dollar system, which could signify a fracture in the U.S. financial framework [13][15] Group 3 - The article emphasizes the need for China to find a balance between maintaining currency stability and ensuring export competitiveness, highlighting the challenges posed by potential passive appreciation of the yuan [13][15] - It warns of the spillover effects of U.S. monetary policy on the global economy, underscoring the importance of developing a robust financial infrastructure to mitigate these impacts [15] - The current situation is framed as a gamble for the U.S., betting that China will not resist pressure as Japan did in the past, but the differing economic contexts suggest that outcomes may vary significantly [15]

Group 1 - Xiamen has significantly relaxed its household registration policies, eliminating requirements for education and housing for residents [5][10][11] - The new proposal allows individuals with stable employment and at least six months of social security contributions to settle in Xiamen, both on the island and off [8][9][10] - The changes are part of a broader trend across China, where many cities are loosening residency requirements to attract talent amid declining population growth [14][16][20] Group 2 - The relaxation of residency requirements is not primarily aimed at boosting the real estate market, as Xiamen has already lifted purchase restrictions [13][14] - Xiamen's population growth has been declining, with the city nearing negative growth, prompting the need for more aggressive measures to attract residents [20][22][26] - The city aims to support its industrial upgrade by attracting talent, as it faces challenges of industrial hollowing and a declining second industry sector [32][33][37] Group 3 - Xiamen's industrial output has been decreasing, with significant drops in key manufacturing sectors, highlighting the need for economic revitalization [37][59][63] - The city has only two trillion-yuan industries, indicating a need for diversification and strengthening of its industrial base [41][43] - The ultimate goal of these policies is to enhance industrial competitiveness by attracting skilled labor and fostering economic growth [64]

Core Viewpoint - The recent crash of a Boeing 787-8 aircraft marks a significant failure for Boeing, breaking its safety record and highlighting deeper issues within the U.S. manufacturing sector, particularly in high-end manufacturing and the aerospace industry [5][9][11]. Group 1: Incident Overview - On June 12, 2025, a Boeing 787-8 crashed shortly after takeoff from Ahmedabad Airport, resulting in the loss of all 242 passengers and crew on board, as well as five medical students on the ground [5]. - The aircraft, which had a service life of 11.5 years, was previously regarded as one of the safest wide-body aircraft, having transported over 1 billion passengers without any fatal accidents [7][9]. Group 2: Manufacturing Decline Analysis - Boeing's reliance on outsourcing, with 70% of its components produced overseas, has led to a loss of control over its supply chain, contributing to systemic quality issues [11][13]. - The company has faced significant quality control problems with its key supplier, Spirit AeroSystems, leading to multiple incidents of component failures and operational issues [15][19]. - Financial strategies focused on stock buybacks and dividends have resulted in a drastic reduction in research and development investment, compromising safety and innovation [17][19]. Group 3: Competitive Landscape - Boeing's market share in China has plummeted from 75% in 2018 to 40.8% in 2025, while Airbus has increased its share to 52.2%, and COMAC is gaining traction with over 1,500 orders for its C919 aircraft [23][25]. - The shift in the global aerospace manufacturing landscape is evident as competitors like Airbus and COMAC focus on integrated supply chains and continuous R&D investment, contrasting with Boeing's financial maneuvering [27][29]. Group 4: Future Outlook - Boeing's new CEO is attempting to implement a restructuring plan, including selling its digital aviation business and promising to localize its supply chain, but faces significant challenges, including regulatory hurdles and negative cash flow [29][32]. - The decline of Boeing serves as a cautionary tale for the U.S. manufacturing sector, emphasizing the need for a balance between financial performance and maintaining technological integrity [35][39].