Core Viewpoint - The article highlights the illegal trade of personal information related to celebrities, particularly their travel details, facilitated by individuals exploiting their access to airline systems and social media platforms [1][5][9]. Group 1: Illegal Information Trade - Zhang, a fan turned full-time "代拍" (photo agent), began purchasing celebrity travel information from a source named "Zhang Ping," who claimed to work for an airline [3][4]. - Zhang sold this information at a markup, initially charging an additional 100 yuan per piece, which could rise to 1000 yuan depending on the celebrity's popularity [3][4]. Group 2: Source of Information - Shu, who worked for an outsourced airline customer service company, illegally accessed and recorded celebrity flight information using her work privileges, selling it to Zhang [5][7]. - Shu's actions resulted in the illegal acquisition of over 100 pieces of personal information, earning her 13,100 yuan [7]. Group 3: Legal Consequences - Both Zhang and Shu were prosecuted for violating personal information laws, with Zhang receiving a seven-month prison sentence and a fine, while Shu was sentenced to ten months with a one-year probation [8]. - The court mandated public apologies and compensation for damages to public interests, highlighting the legal repercussions of such activities [8]. Group 4: Social Media and Platform Responsibility - Investigations revealed that social media platforms are being used to facilitate the sale of celebrity travel information, with users able to access this information for a small fee [9][11]. - Experts suggest that platforms need to enhance their content moderation and accountability measures to combat the spread of illegal information [11].

Group 1 - The core viewpoint emphasizes the importance of legal governance in the digital space, particularly for network platforms that are increasingly involved in social governance and public service delivery [1][3] - The rapid growth of various online platforms, such as short videos and social media, has significantly contributed to high-quality development and modern social governance [1][2] - The integration of government services into online platforms is seen as a modern manifestation of social governance, requiring adherence to legal standards to ensure service quality and citizen rights [3][4] Group 2 - Platform enterprises are characterized by their dual role as traditional businesses and social governance tools, necessitating a balance between public interest and business needs [2][3] - Current legal frameworks guiding the operation of electronic government platforms have made significant progress, but there are still gaps in regulations for platforms providing government services [4] - There is a need to clarify the rights and responsibilities of platform enterprises in delivering government services to enhance their participation in social governance [4]