埃隆·马斯克今年4月在白宫一次内阁会议上 图源：Nathan Howard/REUTERS 导语：马斯克一直致力于维系与JD·万斯的关系，而万斯被视为特朗普"让美国再次伟大"（MAGA） 政治运动的潜在继承者。 知情人士透露，亿万富豪埃隆·马斯克正悄然放缓组建政党的计划。 马斯克已向盟友表示，他希望将精力集中在自己的企业上，且不愿因组建可能分流共和党选票的 第三政党，而疏远有权势的共和党人。 这一态度与上月初形成反差——当时他称将组建"美国党"，以代表对两大主要政党不满的美国选 民。 在考虑组建政党期间，这位特斯拉首席执行官一直着重于维系与副总统JD·万斯的关系——万斯 被广泛视为特朗普"让美国再次伟大"（MAGA）政治运动的潜在继承者。知情人士称，近几周马 斯克与万斯保持联系，且他向身边人坦言，若执意组建政党，将损害与副总统的关系。 多位知情人士称，马斯克正考虑动用其庞大的财富支持万斯若在2028年竞选总统。作为参考，马 斯克在2024年美国大选中耗资近3亿美元支持特朗普（Donald Trump）及其他共和党人。 尽管如此，马斯克并未彻底放弃新党计划。他的盟友透露，随着中期选举临近，他的想法或许会 改变。 ...

新华财经北京8月20日电（卜晓明）美国《华尔街日报》19日报道，美国知名企业家埃隆·马斯克正悄然 给其组建新政党的计划踩下刹车。 报道援引知情人士的消息说，马斯克已告知盟友，他希望把注意力集中于自己的企业，同时不愿通过建 立一个可能分流共和党选票的第三政党来疏远共和党人。 马斯克的最新姿态与他上月初的言论南辕北辙。美国总统特朗普7月4日签署"大而美"法案，马斯克次日 宣布成立"美国党"，瞄准明年的国会中期选举，欲在参众两院占得一席之地。 然而，美国阿克西奥斯新闻网站7月30日报道，马斯克承诺组建政党近一个月后，仍未提交任何正式文 件注册政党。一名知情人士告诉《华尔街日报》，马斯克的助手们在7月下旬取消了一次与专营第三政 党竞选活动的外部团体的电话会议。与会者被告知，会议取消因马斯克希望专注于经营自己的企业。 据《华尔街日报》报道，在考虑启动"美国党"期间，马斯克的部分关注点在于维持与副总统万斯的关 系。消息人士称，马斯克近几周一直与万斯保持联系。他向助手承认，如果他继续推进组建政党的计 划，将会损害他与万斯的关系。 报道说，马斯克及其助手已告知身边亲近人士，如果万斯决定参加2028年总统竞选，马斯克将考虑动用 ...

马斯克或放缓成立"美国党"计划。 当地时间8月19日，《华尔街日报》报道称，特斯拉首席执行官马斯克正悄然放缓成立"第三党"的计划。马斯克告诉盟友，他希望将精力集中在自己的公司上。 知情人士称，马斯克还考虑，如果美国副总统万斯决定在2028年竞选总统，他可能会动用财力予以支持。 目前马斯克方面暂未对此报道作出回应。 今年5月底，马斯克卸任美"政府效率部"负责人，因"大而美"税收与支出法案与特朗普公开决裂。 特朗普7月4日签署"大而美"法案，马斯克次日宣布成立"美国党"，瞄准明年的国会中期选举，欲在参众两院占得一席之地。 根据美国法律，成立一个有资格参与选举的政党，需要经过复杂的认证程序确认资质，必须召开党团会议或代表大会，选举临时官员并指定政党名称。 据英国《独立报》7月30日报道，马斯克至今未注册"美国党"，这与他平日雷厉风行的行事风格相悖。截至目前，由马斯克主导组建的唯一正式政治团体是"美国政 治行动委员会"。这一委员会由马斯克出资，旨在支持特朗普的竞选活动。 特斯拉公司7月23日发布的财报显示，特斯拉二季度业绩不佳，营收、净利润同比均下滑。特朗普24日在社交媒体平台"真实社交"发文，否认外界有关他将"搞 ...

与此同时，公众还了解到，尽管与特朗普公开决裂，马斯克却向共和党阵营捐赠了千万美元的资金。报道称，在6月27日，马斯克向两个主要的超级政治行 动委员会各捐赠了500万美元，成为2025年上半年最大的个人捐助者。此外，他还向自己创立的"美国政治行动委员会"投入了超过4500万美元的资金。尽管 与特朗普的关系已经紧张，并表明有意成立第三党，马斯克仍在中期选举前积极支持共和党。 根据央视新闻的最新消息，美国总统特朗普在当地时间7月31日对美联储主席鲍威尔进行了评价，称他是一位糟糕的主席，甚至表示当初任命鲍威尔担任美 联储主席是一个错误。与此同时，美国联邦储备委员会在为期两天的货币政策会议中，宣布将联邦基金利率目标区间维持在4.25%至4.50%之间不变。这一 决定是美联储连续第五次选择维持利率不变，符合市场的普遍预期。 英国《独立报》在7月30日的报道中指出，马斯克一直未能完成"美国党"的注册，这与他一贯果断迅速的行事风格形成鲜明对比。值得一提的是，在他担任 联邦政府职务期间，马斯克曾迅速成立了政府效率部，致力于推进联邦机构的改革。然而，这一行动并未免除他受到民主党人的苛责，他们批评他在决策上 显得过于仓促而缺乏深思 ...

Group 1 - Elon Musk's potential shift of his business empire to China is fueled by increasing tensions with Trump and the implications of the "Big and Beautiful" bill [3][4] - Dennis Simon from a prominent think tank suggests that significant disagreements over regulations, subsidies, or taxes could lead Musk to relocate more R&D or manufacturing capabilities outside the U.S. [3][4] - China's advanced supply chain and infrastructure may attract Musk, although U.S. export controls and national security barriers could hinder a complete transfer of his business [4] Group 2 - If Musk decides to move key intellectual properties and electric vehicle operations to China, it could be a lucrative decision given the advancements in China's electric vehicle technology [7][8] - Chinese automotive companies have made significant progress in chip development, smart driving systems, and core technologies, making the local industry increasingly competitive [7] - The potential relocation of Tesla could have severe economic repercussions for the U.S., including job losses and public backlash against Trump [10] Group 3 - Musk's announcement of the formation of the "American Party" has begun to take shape, despite facing ridicule and threats from Trump's camp [12] - The goal of Musk's new political party may be to disrupt the U.S. political landscape and create a rift within Trump's support base [13] - Trump is currently facing two major threats from Musk, which could lead to a potential counterattack depending on Musk's future actions [15]

Group 1 - The core issue revolves around the strained relationship between Elon Musk and former President Donald Trump, as well as the implications of Musk's recent actions, including changing his phone number and ceasing communication with House Speaker Mike Johnson after a disagreement over the "big and beautiful" tax and spending bill [1][3] - Mike Johnson expressed his desire to resolve the situation and indicated that he has attempted to reach out to Musk through third parties, hoping for a reconciliation between Musk and Trump [3] - The report highlights that Musk was previously a close ally of Trump, having invested over $290 million during the last federal election cycle to support Trump's victory, and played a significant role in establishing the government efficiency office under Trump's administration [3] Group 2 - Musk's recent criticism of Trump stems from concerns over the increasing national debt, which he attributes to Trump's policies, stating that the fiscal deficit has escalated from $2 trillion to $2.5 trillion under Trump's leadership, potentially leading to national bankruptcy [3] - The article notes that there are multiple factors contributing to the breakdown of the relationship between Musk and Trump, although specific reasons were not detailed [3] - Johnson's comments suggest that there is still hope for a positive relationship between Musk and Trump, despite the current tensions [3]

Core Points - The U.S. Senate narrowly passed a tax and spending bill known as "Big and Beautiful" with a vote of 51 to 50, influenced by Vice President Vance's tie-breaking vote, which will significantly impact U.S. economic policy and energy subsidies [1][9] - The atmosphere surrounding the vote was tense, with notable divisions among lawmakers and public figures, including Elon Musk, who criticized the bill and threatened to form a new political party, the "American Party," if it passed the House [3][5] - Musk's opposition stems from dissatisfaction with the current two-party system, which he believes limits voter expression, and he sees the establishment of a third party as a potential solution [5][7] - Former President Trump responded to Musk's criticism, suggesting that Musk's opposition is motivated by the bill's potential cuts to renewable energy subsidies, which his companies benefit from, and hinted at the possibility of expelling Musk from the U.S. [5][7] - Former President Obama also joined the debate, urging the public to lobby against the bill, which reflects the ongoing struggle within the Democratic Party to regain influence amid recent legislative setbacks [8][9] - The bill's passage reflects deep changes in the U.S. economic and political landscape, with supporters viewing it as a crucial step to stimulate the economy and reshape the tax system, while opponents fear it could harm vulnerable populations and renewable energy policies [9]

Group 1 - Elon Musk claims he is ready to reveal details about the so-called "Lolita Island" related to the Epstein case, suggesting involvement of many prominent figures in the U.S. political and business sectors [1][5] - The U.S. government quickly denied the existence of a "client list," asserting that Epstein's death was a suicide and that there are no new revelations to disclose [7][9] - The Epstein case is sensitive due to the high-profile individuals involved, with over 150 names mentioned in public documents, including former President Bill Clinton and Prince Andrew [7][8] Group 2 - Musk's announcement comes amid his ongoing feud with Trump, with speculation that he may have found leads from Epstein's old files [8][11] - The U.S. government's swift denial of a client list indicates the potential risks of reopening investigations into powerful figures, which could have significant political implications [9][11] - The public's demand for truth regarding the Epstein case is growing, with Musk's claims generating both support and skepticism, impacting his new political party, the "American Party" [9][12]

Core Viewpoint - Elon Musk has announced that his newly formed political party, the "American Party," will prioritize the exposure of documents related to the Epstein case, criticizing former President Trump for not releasing these files [1][3]. Group 1: Musk's Political Moves - Musk confirmed on his social media platform X that the exposure of Epstein-related documents will be a priority for the "American Party" [1]. - The "American Party" aims to focus on securing 2 to 3 Senate seats and 8 to 10 House seats to become a decisive force in Congress, leveraging this "critical minority" to influence significant legislation [4]. Group 2: Trump's Response - Trump dismissed questions about his alleged connections to Epstein, expressing disbelief that the topic is still being discussed and emphasizing the need to focus on current issues like the Texas floods [2]. - Trump criticized Musk's announcement of a new political party as "absurd" and expressed disappointment over Musk's recent behavior, suggesting that a third party has never succeeded in the U.S. [5]. Group 3: Legal Developments - The U.S. Department of Justice and FBI released a memo stating that no evidence was found to support the existence of a "client list" related to Epstein, contradicting previous statements made by the Justice Department [3]. - Musk reacted to the DOJ's statement by posting a meme that illustrated the shifting positions of the government regarding the Epstein case [3].

Core Viewpoint - The establishment of Elon Musk's new political party, "American Party," appears to be a flawed political investment due to its lack of a unique party platform, inability to build a stable voter base, and unrealistic expectations of political influence in Congress [1][2][3][4]. Group 1: Lack of Unique Party Platform - "American Party" lacks a distinct party platform and identity, making it difficult to attract voters [2] - Musk's political views closely align with the Republican Party, failing to provide a fresh alternative for disillusioned voters [2] - Without a novel policy agenda, "American Party" struggles to generate voter interest and support [2] Group 2: Inability to Build a Stable Voter Base - The party cannot establish a dedicated voter base due to the high loyalty of voters to the existing Democratic and Republican parties [3] - The shrinking pool of independent voters makes it challenging for "American Party" to attract significant support [3] - Most independent voters prefer to back parties with a realistic chance of winning, further limiting "American Party's" appeal [3] Group 3: Unrealistic Expectations of Political Influence - Musk's vision of "American Party" influencing Congress is disconnected from political realities [4] - Minority party members must collaborate with majority party members to achieve legislative success, which undermines the idea of "American Party" as a balancing force [4] - The party risks marginalization in Congress and potential electoral losses if it cannot deliver legislative results [4]