美国企业家马斯克在12月10日播出的一档节目中表示，如果重来，他不会领导"政府效率部"，而是专注 运营自己的企业。 ...

Core Viewpoint - Elon Musk expressed regret about leading the "Government Efficiency Office," stating he would prefer to focus on his companies instead, as his leadership attracted opposition and vandalism against Tesla [1][3]. Group 1: Government Efficiency Office - During Musk's tenure at the "Government Efficiency Office," Tesla dealerships and charging stations faced vandalism from opponents, largely due to dissatisfaction with Musk's significant federal employee cuts and political stance [3]. - Musk claimed the "Government Efficiency Office" achieved "some success" in reducing wasteful spending, although the actual savings amount is difficult to quantify [3]. - The official website of the "Government Efficiency Office" reported a total cut of $214 billion, but independent observers argue that the actual savings are likely underestimated [3]. Group 2: Political Involvement - Musk is fully supporting Trump in the 2024 U.S. presidential election, contributing significantly to Trump's campaign efforts [3]. - During his time leading the "Government Efficiency Office," Musk had disputes with several cabinet members of the Trump administration, particularly regarding tax and spending legislation [3].

Group 1 - The core viewpoint of the article is that Elon Musk, during an interview, expressed regret about leading the "Government Efficiency Department" and stated he would prefer to focus on his companies instead [1][3]. - Musk mentioned that during his tenure at the "Government Efficiency Department," Tesla faced vandalism and arson due to opposition to his significant cuts in federal employment and political stance [3]. - The "Government Efficiency Department" claimed to have saved $214 billion, but independent observers argue that the actual savings are less than reported [3][6]. Group 2 - Musk stated that the "Government Efficiency Department" achieved some success in reducing wasteful spending, although he acknowledged that the actual savings are difficult to quantify [3][6]. - Since leaving the "Government Efficiency Department," Musk has not returned to Washington, D.C., and criticized the U.S. government as fundamentally flawed [8]. - Musk has been vocal about the U.S. national debt, highlighting that interest payments exceed the budget of the Department of Defense, and warned that without solutions from AI and robotics, the country faces dire consequences [8].

据新华国际报道，美国电动车制造商特斯拉公司、太空探索技术公司创始人埃隆·马斯克最近接受采访时说，如果重来，他不会领导"政府效率部"，而是专 注运营自己的企业。 马斯克在9日播出的播客节目中接受"政府效率部"前任发言人凯蒂·米勒采访，他哀叹快速改革美国联邦政府何其困难，并承认由于其领导政府效率部的工 作，而这项工作没有得到公众支持，他的企业遭受了巨大损失。 在被问及"如果重来，是否会领导'政府效率部'"，马斯克说："我想不会……如果不干政府效率部的工作，我本可以集中精力建设或经营我的公司。"马斯克 几乎带着一丝怅然地补充道："他们就不会把车烧了。" 马斯克执掌"政府效率部"期间，特斯拉经销商和充电站遭马斯克反对者破坏。按美国媒体说法，特斯拉成为打砸、纵火对象，缘于不少人对马斯克主导 的"政府效率部"大幅裁减联邦雇员以及其政治倾向不满。 马斯克在播客采访中说，"政府效率部"在削减开支方面取得了"些许成功"，"我们停止了不少毫无意义、完全是浪费的资金投入"。 目前，"政府效率部"网站公布的已削减金额是2140亿美元，但其实际节省金额难以量化。独立观察人士坚持认为，美国政府发布的数据比实际节省的金额 少。 （图源：新 ...

Group 1 - Elon Musk stated that if given a second chance, he would not lead the "Government Efficiency Office" but would focus on operating his own companies to avoid backlash from opponents [1] - During Musk's tenure at the "Government Efficiency Office," Tesla faced vandalism and arson, attributed to dissatisfaction with Musk's significant cuts to federal employment and his political stance [1] - The "Government Efficiency Office" reported a budget cut of $214 billion, although independent observers argue that the actual savings are likely underestimated [1] Group 2 - Musk is fully supporting Trump in the 2024 U.S. presidential election and played a significant role in helping Trump win [2] - While leading the "Government Efficiency Office," Musk had disputes with several cabinet members of the Trump administration regarding tax and spending legislation [2]

Core Points - Japan plans to establish a new office to review subsidies and tax reductions, reflecting Prime Minister Suga's commitment to "responsible active fiscal policy" [1] - The new office will be led by Finance Minister Katayama and is expected to be fully operational by next year, with its first meeting scheduled for next month [1] - The office's main tasks include reviewing tax reduction measures, evaluating the effectiveness of high subsidies, and improving administrative efficiency across departments [1] - The establishment of this office is based on a coalition agreement between the Liberal Democratic Party and the Japan Innovation Party [1] Group 1 - The new office is referred to as "Japan's version of DOGE" and aims to eliminate ineffective tax and subsidy policies [1] - There are concerns regarding the potential challenges in implementing reforms due to existing vested interests and departmental barriers [1] - Katayama emphasized the need for broad consensus and understanding to ensure the sustainability of reforms [1] Group 2 - In contrast, the U.S. Government Efficiency Department, which aimed to cut $1 trillion in federal spending, was reportedly dissolved amid controversies [2] - Katayama noted that simply replicating the U.S. model would not work within Japan's parliamentary cabinet system [2] - The establishment of the efficiency department is seen as an opportunity to reduce waste and enhance transparency, but skepticism remains regarding its effectiveness due to past reform experiences and ongoing debates [2]

Core Viewpoint - The U.S. Government Efficiency Office, established by President Trump and led by Elon Musk, is reportedly being disbanded, but the head of the U.S. Office of Personnel Management, Scott Cooper, refutes this claim, stating that the office's principles will continue to be upheld [1][2]. Group 1: Government Efficiency Office Overview - The Government Efficiency Office was created to significantly reduce federal spending and improve government efficiency, with an operational timeline of 18 months before its planned dissolution on July 4, 2026 [4]. - As of April 20, the office claimed to have saved approximately $160 billion for the federal government, which is less than 20% of the $1 trillion spending cut target initially set by Musk [4]. - Despite aggressive measures such as layoffs and budget cuts, federal spending has reportedly increased compared to the previous year [4]. Group 2: Leadership and Controversies - Elon Musk announced the end of his term as a "special government employee" leading the Government Efficiency Office, following a public fallout with Trump over the "Big and Beautiful" bill [5]. - A report from the Senate Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations indicated that the office not only failed to achieve its cost-saving goals but also resulted in over $21 billion in wasteful spending within six months [5].

Core Viewpoint - The report of the premature dissolution of the "Office of Government Efficiency" in the U.S. is inaccurate, according to the Director of the U.S. Office of Personnel Management, who claims that the office's principles will continue despite changes in its structure [1][4][5] Group 1 - The "Office of Government Efficiency" was reported to be dissolved eight months before the end of its contract, as per Reuters [4] - The Director of the U.S. Office of Personnel Management, Cooper, refuted the claims, stating that the office may no longer have centralized leadership but will retain its operational principles [4][5] - The office was established by an executive order signed by Trump on January 20, with the aim of significantly reducing federal spending and enhancing government efficiency [5] Group 2 - The "Office of Government Efficiency" was intended to operate for 18 months and was scheduled for dissolution on July 4, 2026 [5] - Cooper emphasized that the office has driven related reforms and that its principles will be institutionalized by the U.S. Office of Personnel Management and the White House Office of Management and Budget [4][5]

Core Points - The U.S. Government Efficiency Office, established by President Trump to reduce government size, is reportedly disbanded eight months before its term ends, according to Reuters [1] - Scott Cooper, the Director of the U.S. Office of Personnel Management, refuted the claims, stating that while centralized leadership may cease, the office's principles will persist [1] - The Efficiency Office has reportedly saved approximately $160 billion for the federal government, which is less than one-fifth of the $1 trillion spending cut target announced by Elon Musk [2] Group 1 - The Government Efficiency Office was created to cut government spending and was led by Elon Musk [1] - The office's work principles include reducing fraud, waste, and abuse, and restructuring federal personnel [1] - Despite efforts, federal spending has increased compared to the previous year [2] Group 2 - Elon Musk resigned from the Government Efficiency Office in May, following a public fallout with Trump over the "Big and Beautiful" bill [2] - The aggressive measures taken by Musk, including mass layoffs and budget cuts, faced widespread criticism [2]

Group 1 - The "Department of Government Efficiency" (DOGE), established on the first day of President Trump's administration and led by entrepreneurs Elon Musk and Vivek Ramaswamy, has been quietly disbanded with eight months remaining in its contract [1] - The Director of the U.S. Office of Personnel Management confirmed that DOGE "no longer exists," and its functions have been taken over by the Office of Personnel Management [2] - Prior to its disbandment, DOGE significantly reduced federal employees and cut agency budgets, but it lacked public accountability, leading to speculation about its premature termination [2]