就在特朗普在社交媒体上为贸易问题怒火中烧时，约翰·罗斯却向世人发出了一个不容忽视的警告。他直言不讳地指出，虽然现在美国军方嘴上说着和平， 但如果条件一旦成熟，美国将毫不犹豫地按下核按钮，指向中国。 一、接连遭遇背叛，特朗普彻底破防 特朗普一直在强调自己与中国的私人关系多么密切，甚至在镜头前屡次描绘着自己对今年4月访华的期待。然而，现实却给了他当头一棒，打破了他对外交 的幻想。让他感到破防的，不是中国的强硬，而是自己一直信任的盟友的背叛。 二、五角大楼的迷魂阵 就在特朗普大发雷霆之际，美国国防部发布了一份长达30页的《国家防御战略》报告，令人意外的是，这份报告中竟然完全没有提到台湾省。过去类似的报 告中，美国几乎总是将台湾问题作为对中国施压的筹码，时刻把台湾挂在嘴边。然而，这一次他们却选择沉默，甚至在报告中刻意强调美国不寻求与中国发 生直接冲突，并表示将探索与中国合作共处的模式。这一反常的表态让不少国际观察家误以为美国的态度有所转变。有些人开始分析认为，美国政府意识到 硬碰硬的方式行不通，准备在军事上示弱，从而为贸易谈判争取空间；还有人认为，这表明美国国内理智派占了上风，战争的风险开始降低。然而，约翰· 罗斯却 ...

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the recent tensions between the U.S. and China, particularly in light of Canada's new electric vehicle cooperation agreement with China, which undermines U.S. trade strategies and highlights the shifting international alliances away from U.S. dominance [1][3][24]. Group 1: U.S.-China Relations - Trump's anger towards China stems from the realization that previous U.S. trade tactics are no longer effective [1]. - The cooperation agreement between Canada and China on electric vehicles significantly reduces tariffs from 100% to 6.1%, allowing for an annual import quota of 49,000 vehicles, which directly challenges U.S. trade policies [3][4]. - The U.S. Treasury Secretary has threatened China with potential additional tariffs if the Canada-China agreement exceeds its announced scope, indicating a desire to reignite trade tensions [6][18]. Group 2: International Alliances - Canada's recent actions, including the electric vehicle agreement, have set a precedent that undermines Trump's strategy of isolating China through tariffs [8][20]. - Following Canada's lead, Finland's Prime Minister is visiting China with a delegation of over 20 business leaders, indicating a broader trend of European countries seeking cooperation with China [10][11]. - The UK Prime Minister is also planning a visit to China with a large delegation, further signaling a shift in European countries towards collaboration with China [13]. Group 3: Domestic U.S. Challenges - The article highlights three significant domestic issues facing the U.S.: escalating tensions with Europe over U.S. debt, California's move towards independence from federal health policies, and civil unrest following police violence, all contributing to Trump's precarious position [22][23]. - The combination of these domestic challenges and international setbacks has left Trump feeling increasingly vulnerable and desperate, as the U.S. struggles to maintain its global influence [24].

近日，丹麦和美国接连宣布向格陵兰岛增派军事力量，局势持续升温。据悉，丹麦拟于2026年向格陵兰 岛派遣多达1000名作战士兵。1月20日，丹麦首相弗雷泽里克森表示，丹麦如今正面临"最亲密盟友"的 威胁，将做好贸易战准备。有国际问题专家此前向南都N视频记者分析，"特朗普试图通过收割盟友， 来延缓美国霸权的衰落"，欧洲或在经济上对其采取反制措施。 据悉，丹麦目前正在制定计划，拟于2026年向格陵兰岛派遣多达1000名作战士兵。海军和空军也可能参 与其中。截至目前，约有150名丹麦士兵已抵达康克鲁斯瓦格。另有约同等数量的士兵进驻努克，其中 包括约30名正在参加演习的法国山地步兵。此外，北极司令部的常规军事人员也将抵达参与演习。 南都记者注意到，19日晚，一架载有数十名丹麦士兵的飞机降落在格陵兰自治首府努克。另外，来自丹 麦陆军第一旅的大约58名士兵同一天也抵达格陵兰岛的康克鲁斯瓦格。丹麦军方发言人当天表示，丹麦 在格陵兰岛的驻军人数将"大幅增加"。同日，由美国和加拿大共同组建的北美防空司令部宣布，该部多 架飞机即将抵达位于格陵兰岛的美国皮图菲克太空基地，支持既定任务。北美防空司令部表示，此次行 动已同丹麦协调，相关 ...

17日，丹麦本土和格陵兰岛多地分别举行游行示威，抗议美国近期持续发表觊觎格陵兰岛的言论。然而就在抗议活动开始后不久，美总统特朗普发文称，将 对8个反对其收购格陵兰岛的欧洲国家加征10%的关税，数月后还将增至25%。 相关国家随后纷纷发声，称美方行径"不可接受"，欧盟领导人也表示，美国加征关税或导致"危险的恶性循环"。 格陵兰岛及丹麦多地游行示威，抗议美国"夺岛"图谋 当地时间1月17日，在格陵兰岛首府努克举行的示威游行按计划开始。格陵兰岛警方表示，前往美国驻格陵兰岛领事馆方向的部分路段已被封锁，多地出现 交通中断，在示威者通过后，封锁将解除。 格陵兰岛自治政府总理延斯-弗雷德里克·尼尔森也参加了在努克举行的示威游行。他在讲话中表示"我们的未来由我们自己决定"。包括前总理金·基尔森和穆 特·布鲁普·埃格德在内的多位政界人士出席了示威游行。 同日，在丹麦首都哥本哈根，近千名民众举行抗议活动。丹麦税务大臣阿妮·哈尔斯博-约恩森在哥本哈根市政厅广场发表讲话，明确表示支持格陵兰岛人 民。她表示，"今天我们站在这里，就是要一劳永逸地表明立场，格陵兰岛不会出售"。此外，奥尔堡、奥胡斯、欧登塞等多地也举行了抗议活动。 美称将 ...

Core Viewpoint - Protests in Denmark and Greenland against the U.S. claims over Greenland, with significant backlash from European leaders regarding the proposed tariffs by the U.S. [1][3][5] Group 1: Protests and Reactions - Protests occurred in multiple locations, including Nuuk and Copenhagen, with significant participation from political leaders emphasizing Greenland's autonomy [6][7] - Danish Tax Minister expressed strong support for Greenland, stating that Greenland will not be sold [7] - Protests also took place in other Danish cities, indicating widespread public dissent against U.S. actions [7] Group 2: U.S. Tariff Threats - President Trump announced a 10% tariff on goods from Denmark and other European countries starting February 1, increasing to 25% by June 1, contingent on the purchase of Greenland [3][5] - European leaders, including the UK Prime Minister and Danish Defense Minister, condemned the tariff threats as unacceptable [9][11] Group 3: International Law and Stability - Experts criticized the U.S. actions as violations of international law, arguing they undermine regional stability and challenge global governance [12][14] - The unilateral approach of the U.S. is seen as detrimental to its international influence and respect among other nations [14]

17日，丹麦本土和格陵兰岛多地分别举行游行示威，抗议美国近期持续发表觊觎格陵兰岛的言论。然而就在抗议活动开始后不久，美总统特朗普发文称，将 对8个反对其收购格陵兰岛的欧洲国家加征10%的关税，数月后还将增至25%。 格陵兰岛自治政府总理延斯-弗雷德里克·尼尔森也参加了在努克举行的示威游行。他在讲话中表示"我们的未来由我们自己决定"。包括前总理金·基尔森和穆 特·布鲁普·埃格德在内的多位政界人士出席了示威游行。 同日，在丹麦首都哥本哈根，近千名民众举行抗议活动。丹麦税务大臣阿妮·哈尔斯博-约恩森在哥本哈根市政厅广场发表讲话，明确表示支持格陵兰岛人 民。她表示，"今天我们站在这里，就是要一劳永逸地表明立场，格陵兰岛不会出售"。此外，奥尔堡、奥胡斯、欧登塞等多地也举行了抗议活动。 美称将加征关税 直至"完全收购格陵兰岛" 就在当天的抗议活动开始后不久，特朗普在其社交平台"真实社交"上表示，自2026年2月1日起，丹麦、挪威、瑞典、法国、德国、英国、荷兰和芬兰出口至 美国的所有商品加征10%的关税。自2026年6月1日起，加征关税的税率将提高至25%。 相关国家随后纷纷发声，称美方行径"不可接受"，欧盟领导人也表示， ...

本文转自【央视新闻客户端】； 17日，丹麦本土和格陵兰岛多地分别举行游行示威，抗议美国近期持续发表觊觎格陵兰岛的言论。然而就在抗议活动开始后不久，美总统特朗普发文称，将 对8个反对其收购格陵兰岛的欧洲国家加征10%的关税，数月后还将增至25%。 相关国家随后纷纷发声，称美方行径"不可接受"，欧盟领导人也表示，美国加征关税或导致"危险的恶性循环"。 有欧洲学者直言，美国做法违反国际法，破坏地区稳定。加征关税损害他国利益，削弱自身影响力。 格陵兰岛及丹麦多地游行示威 当地时间1月17日，在格陵兰岛首府努克举行的示威游行按计划开始。格陵兰岛警方表示，前往美国驻格陵兰岛领事馆方向的部分路段已被封锁，多地出现 交通中断，在示威者通过后，封锁将解除。 格陵兰岛自治政府总理延斯-弗雷德里克·尼尔森也参加了在努克举行的示威游行。他在讲话中表示"我们的未来由我们自己决定"。包括前总理金·基尔森和穆 特·布鲁普·埃格德在内的多位政界人士出席了示威游行。 同日，在丹麦首都哥本哈根，近千名民众举行抗议活动。丹麦税务大臣阿妮·哈尔斯博-约恩森在哥本哈根市政厅广场发表讲话，明确表示支持格陵兰岛人 民。她表示，"今天我们站在这里，就是要一 ...

美国抓走马杜罗这事引发了世界级的舆情，很多人都在批判美国又开始当世界警察，开始肆意侵犯他国主权，内政。 直接抓走一国总统，这么离谱的事情美国竟然能干得出来？很多人批评美国霸权主义，世界警察，肆意践踏国际秩序，难道二战后建立的国际秩序不要了 吗？ 没错，我觉得，美国这么搞其实体现了它的虚弱，它真的不打算要二战后的国际秩序了。 美国霸权的衰落是全世界所有人都目睹的，但是美国就是不愿意放弃，还要积极打压中、俄、欧，企图维系霸权。 但是经过这么几年操作，发动俄乌战争，发动和中国的全面对抗，什么贸易战，封锁战，军事威逼…… 到最后，美国发现俄乌战争的确废了俄罗斯和欧洲，但是拿中国美国却没有丝毫办法…… 于是我们看到美国开始推出新版的门罗主义，开始逐渐从全球收缩力量，开始把重点集中在美洲。 拉丁美洲各国是有左翼传统的，以古巴，委内瑞拉等国为代表，一直是左翼联盟执政，对外政策以反美为主。委内瑞拉还是拉丁美洲反美的核心。 美国要收缩，要搞新的门罗主义，肯定要拿这些国家开刀。 于是我们看到美国围绕着委内瑞拉搞军事封锁几个月，最后选择了成本最低，效果最好的斩首行动，直接派特种部队抓走了一国元首马杜罗。 这也是杀鸡儆猴，警告拉美其 ...

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses a proposed 28-point plan by the U.S. and Russia regarding the Ukraine conflict, highlighting its implications for Ukraine and the broader geopolitical landscape, suggesting that the plan disproportionately favors Russia while undermining Ukraine's sovereignty and military capabilities [3][22][58]. Military Aspects - Ukraine is required to amend its constitution to permanently renounce NATO membership, with NATO also pledging not to accept Ukraine in the future [4][6]. - Ukraine must reduce its military size to a maximum of 600,000 personnel, significantly down from its current strength [5]. - NATO will not station troops in Ukraine, further limiting Ukraine's military options [6]. - Ukraine agrees to become a non-nuclear state, prohibiting nuclear weapons on its territory and placing its nuclear facilities under international supervision [7]. Territorial Issues - Ukraine must recognize Crimea, Luhansk, and Donetsk as Russian territory, while the areas currently controlled by Russian forces will remain under Russian control [9][12]. - The plan includes a freeze on the front lines in Kherson and Zaporizhzhia, with a demilitarized buffer zone established [9][11]. - This effectively requires Ukraine to concede significant territorial claims, altering the established norms of international negotiations [13][14]. Economic Considerations - All economic sanctions against Russia must be lifted immediately and unconditionally, with a structured timeline for phased removal [18]. - A total of $3 trillion in Russian assets, previously frozen, will be allocated for Ukraine's reconstruction and a new investment tool to enhance U.S.-Russia cooperation [18][19]. - The U.S. is positioned to profit from reconstruction efforts in Ukraine, indicating a financial motive behind the plan [20][21]. Geopolitical Implications - The urgency for Ukraine to accept the plan by November 27 is driven by U.S. interests in concluding the conflict and securing financial benefits [24][30]. - The plan appears to be a strategic move by the U.S. to realign its focus and resources, potentially at the expense of Ukraine's interests [36][40]. - The article suggests that the evolving geopolitical landscape may lead to increased tensions in East Asia, particularly concerning U.S.-China relations [43][58]. Market Reactions - The article anticipates that global markets will experience volatility as the situation develops, with investors needing to remain vigilant [52][56]. - There is a suggestion that opportunities may arise from the shifting dynamics, which could be beneficial for strategic investments [63].

Core Points - Trump's 12-word statement signifies a dramatic shift in the US-China trade war, indicating a potential retreat from high tariffs that were previously seen as a political tool [1][3] - The statement reveals the underlying struggles of the US government, highlighting the impact of China's rare earth dominance on US military capabilities and the agricultural sector [3][5] Group 1: Trade War Dynamics - The US reliance on Chinese rare earth materials is critical, as China accounts for 80% of global production, affecting military technologies like the F-35 fighter jet [3] - The agricultural sector is facing severe challenges, with US soybean exports dropping by 40% and sorghum orders down by 90%, as Chinese buyers turn to Brazil [3][5] - The US beef export to China has plummeted from $120 million to $8 million monthly, while Australia benefits from increased exports [3] Group 2: Economic and Political Implications - The US national debt has surpassed $37 trillion, equating to approximately $110,000 per American, creating a fiscal crisis that complicates government operations [5] - The government shutdown has led to significant disruptions, affecting federal employees and services, which undermines the administration's agenda [5] - The trade war has escalated from an economic conflict to a political survival battle for the Trump administration, as domestic pressures mount [5][7] Group 3: Future Outlook - The reversal in the trade war signals a potential collapse of the existing US hegemony, raising questions about the future of global trade dynamics [7] - The interconnectedness of rare earths, agriculture, and national debt illustrates the complexity of US-China relations and the need for a new balance in global trade [7]