最近国际舞台上最热闹的事，莫过于欧洲国家集体"向东看"。法国总统马克龙刚结束3天的访华行程，德国外长瓦德富尔就紧接着带着合作清单赶来中国， 后面还有德国总理默茨、英国等欧洲国家政要排着队想来访华。这波密集的访华潮，背后离不开特朗普政府的"神助攻"，曾经牢不可破的美欧同盟，如今已 经裂痕累累，让人不禁想问：难道真的名存实亡了？ 要说欧洲为啥突然集体转向中国，特朗普政府绝对是关键推手。美国刚出炉的新版国安战略文件，33页内容里对欧洲的评价堪称扎心，居然说欧洲面临的经 济衰退是小事，"文明消亡"才是大问题。这种话换谁都受不了，要知道欧洲那些老牌国家，最看重的就是自己的历史和地位。更过分的是美国的实际行动， 一边逼着欧洲加码对俄制裁，喊着"盟友就该共进退"，一边转头就举起关税屠刀。去年美欧刚签完"友好关税协议"，欧洲承诺每年买7500亿美元美国液化天 然气，结果美国转头就对欧盟钢铝产品续征25%关税，还新增了对意大利皮具32%的惩罚性关税。欧洲的汽车、美妆这些引以为傲的产业，在美国市场被搞 得举步维艰，这哪是盟友，分明是把欧洲当"大肥羊"宰。 特朗普一直推行的"美国优先"政策，彻底寒了欧洲的心。以前欧洲还能忍忍，但现 ...

Core Points - The NATO defense ministers meeting highlighted significant internal disagreements among member countries regarding defense spending and support for Ukraine, despite a push for a 5% defense spending target [1][2][4] - The proposed compromise by NATO Secretary General Stoltenberg includes a 5% target, with 3.5% for core defense and 1.5% for related infrastructure, aimed for completion by 2032 [2][3] - Some countries, like Estonia, advocate for achieving the 5% target within five years, while others, including the UK and Italy, prefer a timeline extending to 2035, and Spain opposes a fixed percentage [2][3] - NATO members had previously committed to raising defense spending to 2% of GDP by 2024, but several countries, including Spain and Italy, have not met this target, raising concerns about the feasibility of further increases [3] - The meeting focused heavily on military expansion plans, with Germany planning to increase its active military personnel by 60,000, reflecting internal contradictions within NATO regarding defense commitments [3] - The U.S. has sidelined the Ukraine issue during the meeting, indicating a potential strategic withdrawal from European commitments, which may exacerbate transatlantic tensions [4] - The absence of U.S. Defense Secretary Austin from the Ukraine Defense Liaison Organization meeting signals a weakening of U.S. ties with Europe and Ukraine, potentially undermining the NATO alliance [4]