Group 1 - The core opinion of the article is that the legal advisor confirms the legality of the convening and holding of the third extraordinary general meeting of Beijing Shouchuang Ecological Environmental Group Co., Ltd. in 2025 [1][2] - The meeting was announced on August 13, 2025, through various media, detailing the time, location, convenor, voting methods, agenda, and registration procedures [2][3] - The meeting utilized a combination of on-site and online voting, with the on-site meeting held in Room 2212, and online voting available on the same day from 9:15 to 15:00 [3][4] Group 2 - A total of 2 shareholders and their proxies attended the meeting on-site, representing 3,404,159,943 shares, which is 46.3745% of the total shares [4] - Additionally, 995 shareholders participated in the online voting, representing 129,067,341 shares, or 1.7583% of the total shares [4] - The convenor of the meeting was the company's board of directors, which is in compliance with relevant laws and regulations [4][5] Group 3 - The agenda included proposals to cancel the supervisory board and amend the company's articles of association, as well as to revise the rules for board and shareholder meetings [5][6] - The voting process was conducted through both on-site and online methods, with results announced immediately after the voting concluded [6][7] - The proposals received more than two-thirds approval from the voting shareholders, confirming the validity of the meeting's resolutions [7][8]

Core Viewpoint - The legal opinion from Beijing Deheng Law Firm confirms the legality of the 2025 First Extraordinary General Meeting of Guizhou Xintian Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd, stating that all procedures and voting results comply with relevant laws and regulations [1][8]. Group 1: Meeting Procedures - The meeting was convened on July 10, 2025, with the board approving the proposal to hold the extraordinary general meeting [3]. - The notice for the meeting included details such as the convenor, meeting format, time, location, and agenda [3][4]. - The meeting utilized a combination of on-site voting and online voting, with specific time slots for both [3][4]. Group 2: Participant Qualifications - A total of 10 shareholders and their proxies attended the meeting, representing 81,180,341 shares, which is 33.2565% of the total shares [4]. - An additional 107 shareholders participated via online voting, representing 1,116,510 shares, or 0.4574% of the total shares [4]. Group 3: Voting Procedures and Results - All voting matters were clearly outlined in the meeting notice, and no items were postponed or omitted from voting [5][8]. - The voting results for key proposals showed overwhelming support, with the proposal to increase registered capital receiving 99.9705% approval [6][7]. - The election of non-independent and independent directors also received high approval rates, with votes exceeding 98.84% for most candidates [7][8].

Core Viewpoint - Jiangsu New Talent Law Firm has been appointed to witness the legality of the 2024 Annual General Meeting (AGM) of Suzhou Bank Co., Ltd. and to issue a legal opinion based on relevant laws and regulations [1][2]. Group 1: Meeting Procedures - The AGM was convened following the resolution passed by the Board of Directors on April 25, 2025, regarding the proposal to hold the 2024 AGM [3]. - The notice for the AGM was published on April 29, 2024, in several financial newspapers and on the official website [4]. - The meeting was held on May 23, 2025, combining both on-site and online voting methods [5]. Group 2: Attendance and Qualifications - A total of 422 shareholders and their proxies attended the AGM, representing 1,222,671,147 shares, which is 27.9790% of the total voting shares [6]. - An additional 390 shareholders participated in the online voting, representing 417,426,902 shares, or 9.5522% of the total voting shares [6]. - The qualifications of all attendees were verified and deemed compliant with relevant laws and regulations [6][7]. Group 3: Meeting Matters - The AGM reviewed and approved several proposals, including the Board of Directors' work report and the financial statements for the year 2024 [8][10]. - The meeting also addressed the profit distribution plan for 2024 and the authorization for the Board to decide on the mid-term profit distribution plan for 2025 [10][12]. Group 4: Voting Results - All proposals were passed with significant support, including the profit distribution plan which received 99.934% approval from the voting shareholders [10]. - The proposal regarding the expected amount of related party transactions for the next three years was also approved with 99.980% support [12]. - The voting results were announced immediately after the voting concluded, confirming the legality and validity of the meeting's proceedings [12].

Core Viewpoint - The legal opinion letter confirms the legality of the 2024 annual shareholders' meeting of Ningbo Tianpu Rubber Technology Co., Ltd., held on May 23, 2025, ensuring compliance with relevant laws and regulations [1][3][9]. Group 1: Meeting Procedures - The shareholders' meeting was convened by the company's board of directors, with a resolution passed on April 24, 2025, to hold the meeting on May 23, 2025 [4]. - The meeting was held at the company's conference room at 14:00 on May 23, 2025, as announced [4][5]. - The network voting system used was the Shanghai Stock Exchange's system, with voting times specified [5]. Group 2: Attendance and Voting - A total of 4 shareholders and their proxies attended the meeting, representing 100,560,000 shares, which is 75% of the total voting shares [5][6]. - Online voting included 34 shareholders, representing 72,900 shares, or 0.0544% of the total voting shares [5][6]. - The voting results showed overwhelming support for the proposals, with the majority of votes in favor, indicating strong shareholder approval [7][9]. Group 3: Legal Compliance - The legal opinion confirms that the meeting's convening, attendance, and voting procedures complied with the Company Law and relevant regulations [3][9]. - All proposed resolutions were consistent with the meeting notice, and no unlisted matters were voted on [6][9]. - The opinion concludes that the resolutions passed at the meeting are legally valid and comply with all applicable laws and regulations [9].