Group 1 - The core conclusion of the report indicates that a bullish market atmosphere is forming, but there is significant divergence among investors regarding the level of the bull market. The analysis highlights that in small bull markets, earnings are crucial, while in large bull markets, earnings are not the most important factor [2][7][19] - Since 1995, there have been three significant bull markets (with gains exceeding 150%) occurring in 1996-1997, 2005-2007, and 2014-2015, with only one (2005-2007) coinciding with a nominal GDP upturn. In contrast, smaller bull markets (with gains around 50-100%) also occurred three times, all during nominal GDP upturns [3][8][10] - The relationship between macro liquidity (interest rates) and the level of the stock market bull market is weak. Among the four bull markets since 2005, two experienced rising interest rates (2006-2007, 2009), one saw a decline (2014-2015), and one experienced fluctuations (2019-2021) [3][13][15] Group 2 - The report emphasizes that large bull markets are often catalyzed by policies and stock market funding. Historical data shows that when equity financing scales are lower than the dividends of listed companies, larger bull markets tend to follow. This pattern was observed in 1995, 2005, and 2013, leading to significant bull markets in the subsequent years [3][17][20] - The report suggests that the current market conditions, characterized by weak corporate earnings, positive policy stances, and active thematic opportunities, resemble previous periods that led to comprehensive bull markets. It predicts that as policy expectations increase in the second half of the year, the stock market is likely to enter a main upward trend [19][24][25]