证 券 研 究 报 告 【资产配置快评】 开年话躁动——总量"创"辩第 119 期 ❖ 宏观 张瑜：宽松过峰，股债继续重估 1、由于总量政策"摆脱超常规"叠加央行"优化供给，做优增量、盘活存量" 的表述，我们预计短期政府债增速和贷款增速或边际回落，这一过程或带来一 季度 M2 同比的持续下行。 2、考虑到近期市场波动率的小幅提升，居民存款加速搬家的概率不高的前提 下，M2 同比的回落会引致宏观流动性最宽松的时刻正在过去，历史经验来看， 这会对资产估值造成冲击。 3、但是本轮宏观流动性最宽松时段过去与历史相比存在三点不同： ①从基本面来看，当下基本面景气最确定的是中游，由于中游需求更依赖海外， 其景气相对独立，因此国内流动性的松紧对其需求影响不大，反而有助于其供 给侧的加速收缩。在这个视角下，国内流动性收缩对中游利润预期冲击不大。 ②从资产配置来看，绝对视角下，国际经验展示当下十债收益率仍低于国际合 理空间，相对视角下，我们的股债比价指标（股债夏普比率差值）仍显示当下 股票更具配置优势。因此如果流动性收缩冲击偏"贵"的资产的话，只要经济 循环仍在边际改善，那么债券反而是当下"偏贵"的资产。 ③如果经济遭遇突发事 ...

宏观流动性： 上周美元指数有所回升，中美利差"倒挂"程度有所加深。10Y 美债名义/实际利率均回升，通胀预期回升。离岸美元 流动性边际宽松，国内银行间资金面均衡，期限利差(10Y-1Y)收窄。 交易热度、波动与流动性： 市场交易热度继续回升，主要指数波动率均回升。军工、纺服、轻工、商贸零售、消费者服务等板块的交易热度均处 于 80%分位数以上。通信、电新、电子、化工板块的波动率均依然处于 80%历史分位数以上。 机构调研： 基于前 10 大活跃股口径，北上在有色、军工、汽车等板块的买卖总额之比上升，在电子、通信、电新等板块回落。基 于北上持股数量小于 3000 万股的标的口径：北上主要净买入电子、军工、有色等板块，净卖出食品饮料、纺服等板 块。综合来看：北上可能主要净买入军工、有色、汽车、机械、非银等板块，净卖出食品饮料等板块。 两融活跃度有所回落，但仍处于 2025 年 11 月以来的相对高位 上周两融净卖出 22.73 亿元，行业上，主要净买入军工、电力及公用事业、传媒等板块，净卖出非银、通信、电子等 板块。电力及公用事业、家电、食品饮料等板块融资买入占比上升。风格上，两融仅净卖出中盘成长、大盘价值。 龙 ...

Core Viewpoint - The current phase of macro liquidity being the most accommodative may be coming to an end, with expectations of a marginal decline in government debt growth and loan growth in the short term, potentially leading to a continued decline in M2 year-on-year in the first quarter [2][3] Group 1: Understanding Liquidity - Liquidity assessment includes two dimensions: the liquidity of the real economy and the liquidity of the financial market, where the former affects future price and profit trends, and the latter influences current capital market transaction volumes [6][14] - The two main factors affecting liquidity are the growth scale of M2 and the scale of residents' deposit migration [8][16] Group 2: Changes in Liquidity Conditions - M2 year-on-year growth may be declining due to the "escape from extraordinary" policy, with expectations that the marginal increase in government debt in 2026 may be less than in 2025, and a potential decrease in loan growth could further drag down M2 [9][22][23] - The recent increase in market volatility suggests that the probability of accelerated migration of residents' deposits is low, which may lead to a decline in macro liquidity [2][25] Group 3: Differences in Current Liquidity Conditions - The current phase of liquidity contraction differs from historical patterns in three key aspects: 1. The impact on corporate profits is different, as the midstream sector is currently the most stable, with its demand less sensitive to domestic liquidity conditions [3][32] 2. The relationship between stocks and bonds has changed, with current indicators suggesting that stocks have a relative advantage in allocation compared to bonds [3][39] 3. The policy response may differ, as the current economic dynamics are more aligned with high-tech innovation and direct financing rather than traditional real estate and local financing platforms [3][41]

宏观研究 证 券 研 究 报 告 【宏观专题】 宽松过峰，股债重估 ❖ 核心观点 1、由于总量政策"摆脱超常规"叠加央行"优化供给，做优增量、盘活存量" 的表述，我们预计短期政府债增速和贷款增速或边际回落，这一过程或带来一 季度 M2 同比的持续下行。 2、考虑到近期市场波动率的小幅提升，居民存款加速搬家的概率不高的前提 下，M2 同比的回落会引致宏观流动性最宽松的时刻正在过去，历史经验来看， 这会对资产估值造成冲击。 3、但是本轮宏观流动性最宽松时段过去与历史相比存在三点不同： ①从基本面来看，当下基本面景气最确定的是中游，由于中游需求更依赖海外， 其景气相对独立，因此国内流动性的松紧对其需求影响不大，反而有助于其供 给侧的加速收缩。在这个视角下，国内流动性收缩对中游利润预期冲击不大。 ②从资产配置来看，绝对视角下，国际经验展示当下十债收益率仍低于国际合 理空间，相对视角下，我们的股债比价指标（股债夏普比率差值）仍显示当下 股票更具配置优势。因此如果流动性收缩冲击偏"贵"的资产的话，只要经济 循环仍在边际改善，那么债券反而是当下"偏贵"的资产。 ③如果经济遭遇突发事件打破循环，国内政策有望随时加码改善流动性 ...

Macro Liquidity - The US dollar index has declined, and the degree of inversion in the China-US interest rate spread has narrowed. The nominal and real yields of 10-year US Treasuries have both decreased, indicating a drop in inflation expectations [2][14] - Offshore dollar liquidity has marginally eased, while the domestic interbank funding environment remains balanced. The yield spread between 10-year and 1-year government bonds continues to widen [2][19] Market Trading Activity - Overall market trading activity has increased, with many indices experiencing a rise in volatility. Sectors such as retail, military, consumer services, light industry, and textiles are seeing trading activity above the 80th percentile [3][25] - Most indices have shown increased volatility, with sectors like communication, electronics, electric new energy, and chemicals remaining above the 80th historical percentile [3][32] - Market liquidity indicators have declined, with liquidity metrics across sectors remaining below the 70th historical percentile [3][37] Sector Research Activity - Research activity is high in sectors such as electronics, pharmaceuticals, electric new energy, machinery, and non-ferrous metals. The research interest in automotive, computing, communication, and chemicals is also on the rise [4][43] Analyst Profit Forecasts - Analysts have raised profit forecasts for the entire A-share market for 2025 and 2026. The proportion of stocks with upward revisions in profit forecasts has increased across the board [4][51] - Specific sectors such as real estate, construction, coal, consumer services, and home appliances have also seen upward adjustments in profit forecasts for 2025 and 2026 [4][51] - The profit forecasts for the CSI 300 and SSE 50 indices for 2025 and 2026 have been revised upwards, while the profit forecasts for the CSI 500 have been adjusted downwards [4][51] Northbound Trading Activity - Northbound trading activity has decreased, continuing a net sell-off of A-shares. The ratio of buy-sell amounts in sectors like communication, non-ferrous metals, and consumer services has increased, while it has decreased in electronics, computing, and banking [5][29] - For stocks with holdings below 30 million shares, net buying has primarily occurred in computing, non-bank financials, and coal sectors, while net selling has been observed in communication, non-ferrous metals, and automotive sectors [5][31] Margin Financing Activity - Margin financing activity has rapidly increased, reaching the highest point since November 2025. The net buying has been concentrated in sectors like electronics, electric new energy, and communication, while net selling has occurred in non-bank financials, oil and petrochemicals, and retail sectors [6][35] - The proportion of financing purchases has increased in sectors such as consumer services, banking, and electric new energy [6][38] Fund Activity - The positions of actively managed equity funds have continued to rise, with significant net subscriptions in ETFs, particularly those related to institutional investors. Active equity funds have mainly increased their positions in non-ferrous metals, media, and consumer services, while reducing positions in communication, home appliances, and retail sectors [7][45] - The newly established equity fund scale has increased, with active funds seeing a rise while passive funds have decreased. ETFs related to the CSI A500 index have been primarily net purchased, while sectors like military, electronics, and agriculture have seen net selling [7][52]

宏观研究 证 券 研 究 报 告 【宏观快评】 货币政策重点在于调结构 ——2025 年四季度货币政策委员会例会学习心得 事 项 2025 年 12 月 24 日，中国人民银行发布四季度货币政策委员会例会，我们学习 心得如下。 4、央行删掉了"防范资金空转"的表述，这意味着一旦国内经济有较大下行 压力，央行货币政策的掣肘相对较小，可随时灵活加码。 5、总而言之，四季度例会没有更改我们对于后续贷款增速和 M2 增速回落的 判断，宏观流动性最宽松的时间段可能已经过去，这意味着估值进一步抬升存 在难度，资本市场要更关注基本面。 6、对于权益资产而言，当下供需均衡仍在改善的路径上，且股债比较指标（股 债夏普比率差值）也显示股票更具配置优势。我们战略看多股票的观点不变。 但我们提示股票拔估值的摩擦力会越来越大，要更关注基本面和安全边际。 7、对于债市而言，十年期国债收益率突破前低需要货币政策的超预期的非常 规宽松，四季度货政例会看不到这一信号。后续只要经济循环和资本市场风险 偏好在持续改善，那么 2%以下的十年期国债其上行压力仍存。 风险提示： 货币政策超预期 宏观快评 2025 年 12 月 25 日 核心观点 1、 ...

期货研究报告|宏观市场 2025-12-23 日本央行加息短期影响有限 ——宏观流动性系列一 研究院 徐闻宇 * xuwenyu@htfc.com 从业资格号：F0299877 投资咨询号：Z0011454 联系人 郭欣悦 * guoxinyue@htfc.com 从业资格号：F03149577 投资咨询业务资格： 证监许可【2011】1289 号 宏观事件 日本央行于 12 月 18 日-19 日举行议息会议，再次加息 25bp。在全球主要经济体降息的 背景下，日本央行加息的货币政策"错位"增加了市场对宏观流动性收缩的担忧。我 们通过日本央行加息的背景和空间，以及日元套息交易的规模和空间来分析本次会议 影响。 核心观点 请仔细阅读本报告最后一页的免责声明 ■ 空间测算 当前日本的加息空间主要来自通胀、财政与利率结构的三重改善，使基准利率在未来 1–2 年具备从 0.75% 小幅上调至约 1% 的条件。与此同时，美降日升的政策错位将推动 美日利差由约 300bp 收窄至 200bp，使日元套息的收益空间下降并引发全球资产的再平 衡。整体来看，利率与利差的这轮空间收敛更可能带来温和再定价，而非系统性冲击。 ■ ...

机构普遍对权益类资产持较为乐观的态度。富国基金公开表示，沪深300指数股权风险溢价仍处于正一 倍标准差以上水平，相较持续下行的无风险利率，权益资产的风险补偿仍较可观。同时，宏观流动性支 撑仍然有利，全球主要经济体信用周期有望延续温和扩张态势，较好的流动性条件为权益与商品等资产 创造相对有利的环境。而在内需政策持续发力与外需边际企稳的共同作用下，企业盈利修复有望进一步 夯实。（上证报） ...

Group 1 - The core viewpoint of the articles highlights a significant increase in trading volumes for various ETFs, particularly the 中证A500ETF, indicating strong institutional interest and a potential bullish sentiment in the market [1][2][3] - On December 17, multiple 中证A500ETF products reached record trading volumes, with 华泰柏瑞中证A500ETF achieving a trading volume of 14.118 billion yuan, marking a new high since its inception [1] - The 中证A500ETF is recognized as a new generation of broad-based ETFs, balancing core large-cap assets with growth potential across various leading companies in niche sectors [1] Group 2 - Institutional investors are significant holders of broad-based ETFs, with over 80% of the shares in 华泰柏瑞中证A500ETF held by institutions as of June 30 [1] - The trading activity of other broad-based ETFs also surged, with 华泰柏瑞沪深300ETF reaching a trading volume of 5.079 billion yuan and 华夏科创50ETF at 3.948 billion yuan on the same day [2] - Since November, net subscriptions for equity ETFs have totaled 105.241 billion yuan, with a notable single-day net subscription of 15.688 billion yuan on December 16 [2] Group 3 - The 港股 innovation drug theme ETFs have also attracted significant capital, with 汇添富港股通创新药ETF and 广发港股创新药ETF seeing net subscriptions of 3.624 billion yuan and over 2.7 billion yuan, respectively [3] - Several ETFs have reached new highs in terms of shares outstanding, including 南方中证A500ETF with 25.131 billion shares and 华夏恒生科技ETF with 66.012 billion shares [3] - New fund launches have maintained high interest, with several funds exceeding 1.3 billion yuan in issuance in December, and some funds announcing early closure of their fundraising [3] Group 4 - Institutions generally hold an optimistic view on equity assets, with 富国基金 noting that the equity risk premium for the 沪深300 index remains above one standard deviation, indicating attractive risk compensation [4] - Continued macro liquidity support is expected to create a favorable environment for equities and commodities, with a moderate expansion in the global credit cycle [4] - The combination of ongoing domestic demand policies and stabilizing external demand is anticipated to further solidify corporate profit recovery [4]

Group 1 - The core viewpoint of the news highlights the performance of the A500 index and the significant inflow of funds into the A500 ETF, indicating a stable investment environment and potential growth in foreign investment activity [1][2] - The A500 index (000510) experienced a slight decline of 0.20%, while key stocks such as Kweichow Moutai rose by 0.6% and Ping An Insurance increased by 5.1%, reflecting mixed performance among major companies [1] - The A500 ETF managed by E Fund has seen a net inflow of over 730 million in the last two days and a total of over 2.7 billion in the past 60 days, showcasing strong investor interest [1] Group 2 - E Fund is recognized as a leading comprehensive asset management institution in China, with over 20 years of experience in index investment and a wide range of index products covering multiple sectors [2] - The A500 ETF (159361) has a management fee of 0.15% and a custody fee of 0.05%, which are considered low within the industry, making it an attractive option for investors [2] - The A500 ETF is positioned as a key tool for investors looking to allocate resources into China's core assets, benefiting from its broad industry coverage, strong growth attributes, low fees, and good liquidity [2]