自由市场原则

Search documents
安世半导体等事件表明:欧洲的“自由已死”
Sou Hu Cai Jing· 2025-10-15 18:02
有网友感叹:那个曾高举自由、民主价值观的欧洲,如今为何如此堕落了呢——数十年来,"自由"是西方世界在全球叙事中高举的旗帜,是它们定义自身文 明优越性与道德合法性的核心标签。 然而,当我们审视近期在经贸与科技领域发生的一系列事件,一个日益清晰的图景浮现出来:那个曾经的自由市场与开放秩序的倡导者,正因自身竞争力的 相对下滑与战略焦虑,一步步背弃其宣扬的原则。 欧洲,正在系统性远离它曾引以为傲的自由 这一转变的标志性案例,莫过于荷兰政府对中国企业闻泰科技旗下安世半导体的强力干预。这家虽注册于荷兰,但深度融入全球产业链的企业,突然被荷兰 政府以《物资供应法》这一近乎冷战时代的工具,冻结了资产、业务与人事调整的权力。 理由是中国母公司的存在可能对"荷兰及欧洲的经济安全构成风险"。几乎与此同时,欧盟层面传出的风声则更具讽刺意味:布鲁塞尔正严肃考虑,强制要求 在欧投资的中国企业向欧洲同行转让关键技术,以此作为市场准入的"门票"。 从半导体产业的精准围堵,到以行政力量强制撬动技术流动——居然准备直接要求中资企业转让技术。这哪是转让,分明是"抢"啊。这两起事件构成一个完 整的叙事链,彻底暴露当代欧洲在"自由"问题上的机会主义与 ...
英特尔之后特朗普瞄准谁?高官暗示军工、造船业,洛克希德·马丁被点名
Hua Er Jie Jian Wen· 2025-08-27 19:19
Core Viewpoint - The Trump administration is considering applying the government equity acquisition model used in the Intel deal to other key industries, including defense contractors like Lockheed Martin and shipbuilding companies [1][2][3]. Group 1: Government Equity Acquisition - The Trump administration recently acquired approximately 10% of Intel's shares for about $11 billion, funded through the CHIPS Act [2]. - Following the Intel acquisition, the administration is exploring potential investments in other critical industries, emphasizing the need for self-sufficiency in sectors like shipbuilding [2][3]. - The Secretary of the Treasury indicated that the government is not considering acquiring shares in Nvidia, stating that it does not require financial support [2]. Group 2: Defense Industry Focus - The Department of Defense is actively discussing the possibility of acquiring shares in major defense contractors, particularly Lockheed Martin, which derives 97% of its revenue from the U.S. government [3]. - The administration is reassessing how the government funds military and defense capabilities, suggesting a shift from previous funding practices [3]. Group 3: Political Reactions - There is a divide among Republican lawmakers regarding the government's acquisition of Intel shares, with some expressing opposition to government ownership of companies [6]. - Critics warn that government ownership could lead to corporate decisions being influenced more by political considerations than by business interests [6].