Core Viewpoint - The ongoing copyright dispute between G.E.M. (邓紫棋) and Hummingbird Music has escalated as G.E.M. announces the re-recording of her old songs, highlighting the unresolved issues surrounding the ownership of over 100 songs since their contract termination in 2019 [2][10]. Group 1: Copyright Dispute - G.E.M. claims she has not received royalties for her old songs for over six years and asserts her right to re-record under the "statutory license" provision of copyright law [4][7]. - Hummingbird Music maintains that the copyright and songwriting rights of the original works belong to them, accusing G.E.M. of infringing on reproduction, adaptation, and online dissemination rights [5][7]. - The dispute involves 103 songs, including popular tracks like "光年之外" and "泡沫," with Hummingbird Music asserting their ownership of the original recordings [7][10]. Group 2: Industry Implications - The case underscores a broader issue within the industry regarding the unequal contractual relationships that bind new creators, exposing systemic problems related to copyright ownership and royalty settlements [10]. - The ongoing legal battle reflects the challenges faced by artists in securing their rights and fair compensation in the music industry [10].

Core Viewpoint - The ongoing copyright dispute between G.E.M. (邓紫棋) and Hummingbird Music highlights significant issues in the music industry regarding copyright ownership, royalty distribution, and trademark rights, prompting calls for reform in industry contracts and legal frameworks [1][2][4]. Group 1: Copyright Dispute Overview - G.E.M. has not received royalties for her old songs for over six years due to a problematic contract signed at age 15, which transferred rights to 103 original songs to Hummingbird Music [1]. - The dispute has drawn attention to the complexities of music copyright, including the separation of rights among songwriters, performers, and producers, and the exploitation of vague contract terms by companies [2][3]. Group 2: Legal Framework and Solutions - The key to resolving the dispute lies in G.E.M.'s membership in the Hong Kong Composers and Authors Society (CASH), which allows her to retain certain rights over her works despite Hummingbird's claims [2]. - The flexibility of China's Copyright Law enables G.E.M. to re-record her songs without Hummingbird's permission, as long as no prohibitive statements were made during the original release [3]. Group 3: Recommendations for Industry Reform - The dispute serves as a catalyst for restructuring industry contracts, emphasizing the need for clear rights delineation, detailed royalty distribution, and proactive protection of artists' names [4][5]. - Recommendations include mandatory rights lists in contracts, differentiated royalty structures based on usage scenarios, and a dual-track system for payment and dispute resolution to ensure transparency and accountability [5][6]. - Proposals for trademark rights include ensuring that artists retain ownership of their stage names, with strict penalties for companies that attempt to register these names without consent [5][6].