Core Points - The U.S. government shutdown has ended, allowing states to resume the distribution of Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) benefits, but new regulations from the "Big and Beautiful" tax and spending bill are tightening the SNAP system [1][2] - The Congressional Budget Office estimates that approximately 300,000 people nationwide will lose their SNAP eligibility due to these new rules [1] - This reform represents the most significant tightening of SNAP in a decade, requiring all adults under 65 without serious health limitations to prove they work, receive education, or participate in training for at least 80 hours per month, or they can only receive benefits for a maximum of three months [1][2] Summary by Sections SNAP Eligibility Changes - The new regulations require most previously exempt groups, including veterans, the homeless, and parents of children under 18, to meet work requirements, with the only new exempt group being legally defined Native Americans and tribal members [1] - The changes have been in effect since July 4, but states were given a 120-day adjustment period that ended on November 1 [1] Management and Funding Implications - States must manage SNAP more accurately or risk losing federal funding; starting in fiscal year 2028, states with an error rate exceeding 6% will face funding cuts [2] - From November 1, all errors will be counted, including those made during the government shutdown when states issued emergency benefits, which could complicate efforts to meet the error rate target [2] - Currently, only eight states are expected to meet the new requirements, while the national average error rate was nearly 11% last year [2] Program Scope and Financial Impact - SNAP is a crucial part of the U.S. social safety net, covering 42 million people, or about one-eighth of the U.S. population, with most participants living below the poverty line [2] - The program spends over $8 billion monthly, and for the first time in its 60-year history, SNAP benefits were halted during the recent government shutdown [2]

Group 1 - The U.S. federal government shutdown has ended, but many federal employees are still facing disruptions in their work and pay [1][2] - Approximately 1.4 million federal workers were either furloughed or working without pay during the shutdown, and the timeline for receiving back pay varies by agency [1][3] - The temporary funding bill signed by President Trump only provides enough support for most government departments until January, raising concerns about potential future shutdowns [1][2] Group 2 - The shutdown has severely impacted the U.S. safety net programs, particularly affecting around 42 million Americans relying on food stamps [3] - The release of economic data was paused during the shutdown, including the monthly employment reports for September and October, and the initial GDP estimate for Q3 [3] - The U.S. airport system experienced significant disruptions due to a shortage of over 3,000 air traffic controllers, which may continue even after the government reopens [2]

Core Insights - The article highlights the struggles of low-income Americans relying on the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP), emphasizing their frustration with the government's handling of food aid during political negotiations [1][3][4] Group 1: SNAP Program Overview - SNAP is a crucial part of the U.S. social safety net, serving approximately 1 in 8 Americans, primarily those living below the poverty line [3] - The program incurs monthly expenditures exceeding $8 billion, but funding was suspended due to a federal government shutdown, leading to a temporary halt in aid distribution [3] - The U.S. Department of Agriculture announced the use of emergency funds to maintain 65% of food assistance payments for November [3] Group 2: Personal Accounts and Impact - The article features personal accounts from individuals like Felisa Rogers, who express anger over their precarious living conditions and the political manipulation of food aid [1][4] - Many SNAP recipients, including those in rural Oregon, face food shortages and must rely on alternative food sources, such as hunting and foraging [3] - The narrative illustrates the broader societal issues, including stagnant wages and rising living costs, which exacerbate the struggles of low-income individuals [4]

Core Points - The Trump administration has instructed states not to distribute full benefits for the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) for November, following a temporary halt ordered by the U.S. Supreme Court [2][3] - The USDA has issued a memo indicating that during the government "shutdown," states are only to distribute 65% of the benefits and must retract any full payments already made [2] - This marks the first time in 60 years that SNAP benefits have been suspended, affecting approximately 42 million people, or one-eighth of the U.S. population, with monthly expenditures exceeding $8 billion [3] Group 1 - The U.S. Supreme Court issued an emergency order to halt lower court rulings requiring full SNAP benefits distribution for November [2] - The USDA's memo threatens states with actions such as the cancellation of federal funds for administrative costs if they do not comply with the new guidelines [2] - The SNAP program is a critical part of the U.S. social safety net, primarily serving low-income individuals [3] Group 2 - The USDA's directive requires states to withdraw any steps taken to issue full SNAP benefits for November [2] - The program's suspension is unprecedented, even during previous government shutdowns, highlighting the severity of the current situation [3] - The majority of SNAP beneficiaries live below the poverty line, emphasizing the program's importance for food security [3]

Group 1 - The core viewpoint of the article is that President Trump proposed to end the Senate's filibuster to resolve the government shutdown, but this proposal was rejected by Republican senators, indicating a division within the party regarding legislative strategy [2][3]. - Trump emphasized the urgency of passing legislation to reopen the government, citing significant impacts on programs like the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP), the airline industry, and the stock market due to the shutdown [2]. - The current Senate rules require at least 60 votes to advance most legislation, and despite Republicans holding a majority with 53 seats, they have been unable to overcome the filibuster, resulting in 14 failed attempts to pass temporary funding bills to end the shutdown [3]. Group 2 - Republican leaders, including Mitch McConnell and John Thune, have expressed opposition to ending the filibuster, arguing that it protects the nation from extreme legislation and could backfire if Democrats regain power [3]. - Some Republican senators warned that abolishing the filibuster could open the door for more radical agendas if the Democrats take control in the future, highlighting concerns about the long-term implications of such a rule change [3].

Core Points - The U.S. government shutdown has reached its 36th day, marking the longest federal agency closure in history [1] - President Trump expressed concerns about the negative impacts of the shutdown on the stock market, airline industry, and the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) [1] - Despite acknowledging a slight market impact, Trump claimed that the U.S. economy is the strongest in history, citing record highs in the stock market over the past nine months [1] Economic Impact - The shutdown is estimated to cause economic losses of up to $15 billion per week, with most estimates around $15 billion [3] - The current economic environment is more fragile compared to previous shutdowns, with inflation pressures and employment uncertainties affecting the public [3] - The shutdown has frozen approximately $24 billion in federal procurement spending, impacting contractors and suppliers [3] Food Assistance and Small Business - The delay in food assistance due to the shutdown is expected to affect 42 million people reliant on SNAP, with only half of the usual benefits being funded for November [4] - Over 4,800 small businesses have faced a total of $2.5 billion in loan disbursement delays due to the shutdown [3] Legislative Stalemate - Trump urged Republican senators to end the filibuster to break the deadlock and pass funding bills, but this proposal faced immediate resistance from GOP leadership [5] - As of November 5, attempts to advance temporary funding bills to end the shutdown have failed 14 times in the Senate due to not reaching the required 60 votes [5]

Core Points - President Trump calls for the Republican Party to end the filibuster immediately to facilitate the passage of legislation aimed at reopening the government [1] - The government shutdown is significantly impacting the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP), the airline industry, and stock market operations [1] - The current Senate rules require at least 60 votes to advance most legislation, which the Republican Party has not been able to achieve despite holding a majority [1] Summary by Sections - **Government Shutdown Impact** - The shutdown has severely affected SNAP food assistance, the airline industry, and stock market operations [1] - The issue of government shutdown is considered an important factor in upcoming elections [1] - **Filibuster and Legislative Challenges** - Trump previously urged Republican senators to utilize the "nuclear option" to eliminate the filibuster, which requires 60 votes to advance legislation [1] - The temporary funding bill aimed at ending the government shutdown has failed to advance 14 times in the Senate due to the lack of 60 votes [1] - **Republican Opposition to Filibuster Elimination** - Senate Republican leader John Thune and several Republican senators oppose the elimination of the filibuster, arguing it protects the nation from extreme legislation [2] - Concerns are raised that abolishing the filibuster could enable future Democratic administrations to pass more radical agendas [2]

Core Points - The article highlights the stark contrast between President Trump's lavish Halloween party at Mar-a-Lago and the simultaneous loss of food assistance for approximately 42 million Americans due to government shutdowns [1][2][4] - Critics, primarily from the Democratic Party, have condemned the party as tone-deaf, especially as the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) funding ran out, marking the first interruption of this major anti-hunger initiative [2][4] - The event featured extravagant decorations and performances, reminiscent of the Roaring Twenties, with potential ticket prices reaching up to $1,000, although it remains unclear if guests were charged for entry [6][8] Government Shutdown Impact - The ongoing government shutdown has led to significant disruptions, including the freezing of wages and the forced unpaid leave of around 13,000 air traffic controllers, with approximately 1.4 million federal employees affected [8][11] - Major airports across the U.S. have experienced delays due to the shortage of air traffic controllers, exacerbated by the shutdown, with Los Angeles International Airport temporarily halting flights [11] - Public sentiment appears to blame the Trump administration for the shutdown, with polls indicating a net approval rating for Trump at -18%, lower than Biden's at a similar point in his presidency [11]

美国粮食券发放危机持续 政府停摆殃及4200万人餐桌 中新网11月2日电 综合美媒当地时间11月1日报道，美国联邦政府停摆引发的"补充营养援助计 划"(SNAP，又名粮食券计划)断供危机持续加剧，波及数百万依赖该计划的美国家庭，使其面临食物短 缺的困境。 福利断供 救济站排起长龙 美国一民间组织全国家长联盟指出，由于数百万民众的粮食券福利"突然中断"，全美多地食品救济站近 日出现抢购人潮，社会安全网裂缝正演变为一场现实生存危机。 在纽约布朗克斯区，前往当地救济站领取食品的队伍，从凌晨开始蜿蜒数个街区，人数比往常多出数 百。 寒风中，人们裹紧外套、推着折叠购物车，在横跨数个街区的队伍中等待。有人凌晨四点就已赶到，只 为在成堆的面包、蔬果中分得一份温饱。 类似的场景在多个城市同步上演。近日，全美多地民众被迫在食品救济站和驾车领取点排起长龙，等待 免费餐食和杂货。一名救济机构人员认为："这已超越一般的危机范畴。你能亲眼目睹人们的绝望，感 受他们正在经历的挫败。" 资料图：美国国会大厦。 政治司法夹缝中 民众承受生存代价 在美国，政策与司法陷入拉锯战，而代价却由受影响的民众承担。 资料图：美国民众在当地超市购物。 分 ...

Core Points - A federal court has ordered the Trump administration to continue providing food stamp benefits to millions of Americans, preventing the White House from using the interruption of key social welfare as a political tool [1] - The ruling affects approximately 42 million people who rely on the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) [1] - The court instructed the Trump administration to utilize emergency funds reserved by Congress to maintain at least part of the SNAP benefits [1] Group 1 - Judge Jack McConnell's ruling blocked the planned cut-off of SNAP benefits, which was set to take effect the following day [1] - The lawsuit argued that cutting SNAP benefits was arbitrary and created a crisis for those dependent on food stamps [1] - Another federal judge, Indira Talwani, expressed similar views in a related case, indicating that the plaintiffs could likely prove the suspension of benefits was illegal [1] Group 2 - In response to judicial pressure, President Trump stated he has instructed his legal team to seek clarification on how to legally fund SNAP [2] - The Trump administration claims its actions are legally justified, arguing that the SNAP program is effectively non-existent due to Congress's failure to pass a funding bill [3] - The administration's lawyer, Tyler Becker, emphasized that the decision to use up to $6 billion in emergency reserves is at the discretion of the executive branch [3] Group 3 - The court's decision sparked strong reactions from both political parties, with Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer praising the ruling and criticizing Trump's decision to cut SNAP as retaliatory and cruel [5] - Schumer accused Trump of attempting to create a hunger crisis to avoid making concessions on healthcare issues [5] - Conversely, White House officials expressed strong dissatisfaction with the ruling, with National Economic Council Director Kevin Hassett criticizing the decision and warning of potential risks to emergency funds [6][8]