贸易博弈再添新局，世贸组织为美欧熟橄榄争端画上关键句点。 当地时间12月19日，世界贸易组织成员在争端解决机构会议上达成共识。 正式授权欧盟依据此前世贸组织的裁决，对美国进口商品实施反制措施。 这场聚焦熟橄榄贸易的争端已持续数年。核心争议源于美欧双方在熟橄榄进口关税、市场准入规则等方 面的分歧。 欧盟曾多次就美国对欧盟熟橄榄产品的贸易限制措施提出异议，最终将争端提交世贸组织裁决。 不久前，世贸组织仲裁机构已就此案做出明确裁决。 裁决认定美国相关贸易措施违反世贸组织规则，允许欧盟每年对价值不超过1364万美元的美国商品实施 反制。 这一金额是仲裁机构根据欧盟因美国贸易限制所遭受的损失，经过精准核算得出的。 此后，欧盟依据该裁决，正式向世贸组织争端解决机构提交申请。 在争端解决机构会议上，世界贸易组织各成员经过审议，最终同意了欧盟的这一申请。 这意味着欧盟已获得世贸组织的合法授权，可随时启动对美国商品的反制措施。 欧盟方面同时透露，具体受影响的美国商品清单将在适当的时候正式公布。 外界推测，清单可能涵盖美国本土特色农产品、轻工业制品等领域。 此次裁决与授权，是世贸组织争端解决机制发挥作用的典型案例。 作为全球多边 ...

Core Viewpoint - Canada is reviewing tariffs imposed on Chinese electric vehicles, steel, and aluminum, following a year of significant trade tensions between Canada and China, particularly regarding canola products [1][2]. Group 1: Tariff Review and Government Actions - The Canadian government has initiated a review of the tariffs on Chinese electric vehicles, steel, and aluminum to assess the current tax rates' validity [1]. - The review is expected to officially start next month, with updates to be provided at appropriate times [1]. - Since the implementation of these tariffs, the import volume of the affected products has significantly decreased [1]. Group 2: Trade Delegation to China - A parliamentary secretary will accompany a trade delegation to China, indicating a potential shift in the Canadian government's approach to trade relations with China [2][8]. - The delegation, led by Saskatchewan Premier Scott Moe, aims to negotiate the canola import guarantee issue and foster dialogue for a closer trade relationship [3][6]. - This visit marks the first time in six years that a Canadian provincial leader has led a delegation to China [6]. Group 3: Broader Trade Implications - The Saskatchewan government is seeking to address not only canola but also tariffs on other Canadian products such as peas, pork, and seafood during the visit [6]. - The Canadian government is also taking measures to protect jobs in the canola industry and plans to announce additional support for Canadian producers [8][10]. - There is an acknowledgment from Canadian officials that there is still room for growth in trade with China, particularly in the agricultural sector [10].

Group 1 - The global trade landscape is undergoing significant adjustments, particularly due to unilateral tariff measures imposed by the U.S. since Trump's administration, which have severely disrupted U.S.-China economic relations [1][3] - As of April 10, 2025, the U.S. has imposed additional tariffs on Chinese products amounting to 145%, while China has raised its tariffs on U.S. goods to 125% starting April 12 [1] - The recent Geneva talks on May 12 resulted in a consensus to significantly reduce bilateral tariffs, leading to a positive reaction in global stock markets [3] Group 2 - The upcoming trade negotiations will see a change in the Chinese delegation, with the inclusion of the Finance Minister, indicating a higher level of importance and broader scope of discussions, potentially extending to macroeconomic policy coordination [3][4] - The U.S. has expressed resistance to this change, with the Treasury Secretary stating that only specific officials have legal authority in negotiations, reflecting concerns over the negotiation dynamics [4] - Key topics for the negotiations include China's export controls on rare earths, market access issues, and overall tariff levels, with the U.S. seeking further market openness from China [4][6] Group 3 - The EU is actively engaging with China, aiming to understand China's stance on U.S.-China relations and seeking potential cooperation to mitigate risks from the trade conflict with the U.S. [6][7] - The EU has prepared a set of four measures to address U.S. trade actions, with the visit to China being a crucial step in coordinating with other countries [7] - Despite the EU's engagement with China, recent sanctions against Chinese firms in the context of Russia raise questions about the EU's true intentions and strategy [7][9] Group 4 - The new round of trade negotiations is marked by uncertainty, with both U.S. and China having differing views on negotiation teams and topics, while the EU seeks to balance its interests amid the U.S.-China trade tensions [9] - The emphasis remains on resolving trade disputes through dialogue and cooperation, with China aiming to protect its interests while fostering a fair and open global trade system [9]

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the establishment of a dispute resolution panel by the WTO regarding Canada's imposition of additional tariffs on Chinese electric vehicles, steel, and aluminum products, which China claims violate GATT regulations [1][2][4]. Group 1: Dispute Background - On October 1, 2024, Canada officially implemented a 100% additional tariff on electric vehicles imported from China, followed by a 25% additional tariff on steel and aluminum products from China starting October 22, 2024 [3][5]. - China initiated a lawsuit at the WTO against Canada's unilateral and protectionist measures, asserting that these actions are inconsistent with WTO rules [3][6]. Group 2: Tariff Details - The dispute, numbered DS627, involves Canada's 100% additional tariff on all Chinese-made electric vehicles and a 25% tariff on steel and aluminum products [4][5]. - In 2023, the trade value affected by these measures was approximately $1.7 billion for electric vehicles, $950 million for steel products, and $720 million for aluminum products [10][11]. Group 3: Responses and Negotiations - China expressed willingness to engage in constructive dialogue with Canada despite the request for the establishment of an expert group [7][8]. - Canada maintains that its measures comply with GATT regulations and also expresses a desire for constructive dialogue with China [8]. Group 4: Countermeasures and Further Actions - In response to Canada's tariffs, China announced anti-discrimination measures, including a 100% tariff on certain Canadian imports such as canola oil and specific seafood products, effective March 20, 2025 [14][15]. - Canada argues that China's countermeasures exceed the commitments made under GATT and seeks expedited processing of the dispute due to the perishable nature of the goods involved [16][17]. Group 5: Future Implications - China's ambassador to Canada highlighted the potential for cooperation in the electric vehicle sector, emphasizing the benefits for both countries and the need for a fair trade environment [11]. - The article concludes with the assertion that the resolution of these disputes hinges on Canada's actions regarding the discriminatory tariffs imposed on Chinese products [19].