Group 1 - The core viewpoint of the articles revolves around the ongoing trade war initiated by Trump, highlighting the varying responses from different countries, with a focus on negotiation as the ultimate goal [1] - Trade negotiations are complex power struggles involving multiple aspects, with China's strategies during the US-China trade friction providing insights for other countries, particularly India [3][4] - China's control over over 80% of the global rare earth supply chain is a significant leverage point in negotiations, demonstrating the importance of strategic resources in trade discussions [3] Group 2 - Effective countermeasures in trade negotiations should be precise and targeted rather than broad threats, as demonstrated by China's approach to US tariffs [4][7] - The reliance of US high-tech industries on Chinese rare earth materials illustrates the importance of understanding dependencies in negotiations [4][5] - China's strategic patience and long-term policy stability contrast with the uncertainty of US policies, providing a lesson for other nations in maintaining a consistent approach [15] Group 3 - India's potential to leverage its significant position in the global pharmaceutical industry, particularly in generics, could enhance its negotiation power [3][12] - The need for India to diversify its trade partnerships beyond the US is emphasized, suggesting that strengthening ties with the EU, ASEAN, and Gulf countries could provide more options in negotiations [12] - India's current reliance on China for raw materials and high-end chip production highlights the necessity for self-sufficiency in critical sectors to improve its bargaining position [13]

周三协议宣布后，韩国通商资源部长官金正宽在华盛顿对记者表示，他们收到的建议包括称赞特朗 普为"伟大的人"，并且说话要尽可能简单。 负责与美国总统唐纳德·特朗普进行最后谈判的韩国部长们表示，为了做好谈判准备，他们事先进 行了排练，并征求了与这位不可预测的领导人打交道的建议。 他说："我们事先收集了很多对方使用的谈判策略，对如何应对做了很多思考，所以谈判非常顺 利。" 通商交涉本部长吕翰九援引特朗普的话说，他在与国家元首以外的官员打交道时很少亲自参与，这 意味着"他非常尊重韩国，非常重视韩国"。 作为一个主要的出口导向型经济体，与美国的贸易谈判对韩国来说关系尤其重大。在韩国总统李在 明今年6月提前赢得大选后，金正宽代表团的其他成员刚刚上任几个星期。 金正宽称特朗普是"谈判大师"，并表示，包括经济副总理具润哲和通商交涉本部长吕翰九在内的团 队成员轮流扮演美国总统的角色，进行了准备工作。 "我们试着像特朗普总统一样说话，特朗普总统的说话方式非常简洁直接。关于如何回答这个或那 个问题，我们自己准备了很多场景。" 韩国经济副总理兼产业通商资源部长官具润哲说，当团队在社交媒体上看到相关消息时，他们才确 定自己会和特朗普见面 ...

Core Viewpoint - The ongoing trade negotiations between the US and India are marked by tension and uncertainty, with both sides making conflicting statements and proposals regarding tariffs and trade agreements [1][4]. Group 1: US-India Trade Negotiations - The US has expressed intentions to impose a 25% tariff on non-US manufactured smartphones starting from late June, with President Trump indicating he does not support Apple establishing manufacturing in India [4][5]. - India has proposed retaliatory tariffs on US products worth $19.1 billion in response to US steel and aluminum tariffs, affecting $7.6 billion worth of Indian goods [8][12]. - India's trade representatives are showing flexibility on certain products like almonds, while maintaining high tariffs on sensitive agricultural products such as wheat and dairy [9][10]. Group 2: Economic Implications for Apple - A Bloomberg report indicates that manufacturing iPhones in the US is impractical due to high labor costs and a lack of necessary skilled workers, suggesting that Apple may continue to diversify its production in low-cost regions like India and Vietnam [4][5]. - The report highlights that even with a 25% tariff on a $1,000 iPhone, the cost would be $250, which is significantly lower than the estimated $3,500 cost of producing the same iPhone in the US [5][6]. Group 3: India's Trade Strategy - India is seeking to protect its sensitive agricultural sectors, which employ millions, while negotiating trade terms that reflect recent agreements with other countries, such as the UK [11][12]. - The Indian government aims to double bilateral trade with the US to $500 billion by 2030, indicating a strategic long-term vision for trade relations [11].