Workflow
跨境收购
icon
Search documents
蚂蚁吞下香港券商,还要再等4个月
Tai Mei Ti A P P· 2025-11-26 09:41
蚂蚁收购耀才证券的交易有新进展,其进军香港证券行业的进度暂时受挫。 11月25日晚间,香港耀才证券公告表示,双方已签订修订协议,将收购要约的时间延长4个月,最终截 止日期更新为2026年3月25日;同时,蚂蚁方面追加了1.642亿港元(占总交易金额约5.83%)的保证金 给耀才证券原股东。公告也提示,交易条件的达成和最终结果依旧存在不确定性。 结合4月25日签订协议时已支付的10%保证金(2.814亿港元),蚂蚁已经为该笔未完成的交易支付约4.5 亿港元。 耀才证券自发布拟被收购公告以来,股价经历了大幅波动。 4月宣布收购消息后,耀才股价从3港元一路大涨,一度创下历史新高。尤其受蚂蚁国际、蚂蚁数科宣布 申请香港稳定币牌照的消息刺激,耀才证券股价在7月21日创下17.68港元/股的最高记录。此后耀才股 价有所回落,截至11月11日,耀才证券的收盘价为8.71港元。 一位券商高管向笔者表示,该笔交易的完成非常繁复,面临"跨境收购+金融行业+民企收购民企"等多 重挑战。在他看来,蚂蚁集团选择收购而非自主申请牌照的主要目的是借此快速获取牌照,避免漫长的 审批流程(申请全牌照的难度更大,过程需要大约两年时间),尽快实现 ...
实控人公开喊话“前任” 万林物流跨境收购后遗症再现
Zheng Quan Shi Bao· 2025-11-11 17:57
Core Viewpoint - The conflict between the current actual controller of Wanlin Logistics, Fan Jibo, and the former controller, Huang Baozhong, centers around allegations of undisclosed key asset conditions during the transfer of control, which has led to significant financial implications for the company and its investors [2][3]. Group 1: Background of the Dispute - Fan Jibo publicly called out Huang Baozhong for not taking responsibility for the operational results and losses incurred during his tenure as the historical leader of the company [2]. - The dispute has negatively impacted Wanlin Logistics' bank credit, affecting its future development [2]. - The core issue involves the acquisition of African businesses made eight years ago, which has come under scrutiny [2]. Group 2: Acquisition Details - In June 2017, Wanlin Logistics acquired a 55% stake in Yulin International for 293 million yuan, gaining control over forestry companies in Gabon, with rights to approximately 1.07 million hectares of forest [3]. - The performance of Yulin International was satisfactory during the three-year performance commitment period (2017-2019), but it began to incur significant losses from 2020 onwards [3][5]. - Upon taking control, Fan Jibo discovered severe liquidity issues within Wanlin Logistics, with 2.7 billion yuan in receivables and long collection cycles [3]. Group 3: Financial Strain and Actions Taken - Wanlin Logistics continued to prepay and advance operational funds to Yulin International despite not receiving dividends, leading to financial strain [4]. - In 2021 and 2022, Yulin International reported losses of 69.83 million yuan and 273 million yuan, respectively, prompting Wanlin Logistics to divest from the company [5]. - In June 2023, a subsidiary of Fan Jibo announced a 51.08 million yuan acquisition of the 55% stake in Yulin International, effectively removing it from the listed company structure [5]. Group 4: Legal and Operational Challenges - Huang Baozhong allegedly facilitated the creation of fictitious transactions and misappropriated funds during his tenure, which has complicated the resolution of outstanding debts [8]. - Following the divestment, Yulin International's operational status remains unclear, with ongoing challenges in asserting control over the Gabonese assets [10]. - Fan Jibo has indicated that Huang Baozhong's failure to fulfill his commitments has exacerbated the situation, leading to further operational disruptions for Wanlin Logistics [10].
A股首例竞争性要约收购 迎来关键时刻
Xin Hua Wang· 2025-08-12 05:38
Core Viewpoint - The competitive tender offer for ST Xinchao by Jindi Petroleum has failed as the number of shares tendered did not meet the required threshold for the offer to be effective [1][2][3] Group 1: Competitive Tender Offer Details - Jindi Petroleum's tender offer was for 20% of ST Xinchao's total shares at a price of 3.10 yuan per share, requiring a maximum funding of 42.16 billion yuan [3][4] - The offer was unsuccessful as only 963.2 million shares were tendered, representing approximately 0.14% of the total shares, which was below the required amount [2][3] - The competitive nature of the tender offer was intensified by the entry of Yitai B shares, which offered a higher price of 3.40 yuan per share, leading to a significant withdrawal of shares from Jindi's offer [5][6] Group 2: Yitai B Shares Offer - Yitai B shares initiated their tender offer on April 18, 2025, with a price of 3.40 yuan per share, which is nearly 20% higher than ST Xinchao's closing price of 2.84 yuan on that date [5][6] - As of May 7, 2025, Yitai B shares had received tenders for 13.58 billion shares, accounting for approximately 19.99% of ST Xinchao's total shares, with only 8.01% remaining to meet the offer's effectiveness condition [6][7] - The total number of shares Yitai B shares aims to acquire is 34.68 billion, representing 51% of ST Xinchao's total shares, with a maximum funding requirement of 117.92 billion yuan [6][7] Group 3: Regulatory and Market Context - ST Xinchao is currently under investigation by the China Securities Regulatory Commission due to delays in disclosing its annual report, which has led to its stock being suspended [7][8] - Despite the investigation, the ongoing tender offers are not affected, allowing investors to continue participating in the Yitai B shares offer [7][8] - The case of ST Xinchao highlights the complexities and regulatory challenges in competitive tender offers, especially in the context of cross-border assets and compliance [11]
拟17亿联合收购荷兰LED公司,三安光电如何盘活亏损标的?
Core Viewpoint - Sanan Optoelectronics plans to acquire 100% equity of Lumileds Holding B.V. for $239 million, aiming to enhance its position in the high-end automotive and flash lighting markets [2][8] Group 1: Acquisition Details - The acquisition involves a joint investment with Inari, where Sanan will hold 74.5% and Inari 25.5% in a newly established Hong Kong joint venture [2] - The total investment for the joint venture is $280 million, which will cover the acquisition price and operational costs of Lumileds [2] - Following the acquisition, Sanan will indirectly own 74.5% of Lumileds [2] Group 2: Target Company Overview - Lumileds specializes in mid-to-high-end LED products for automotive lighting, camera flashlights, and specialty lighting [4] - The company has production bases and sales centers in China, Asia, and Europe [4] - Lumileds has undergone several ownership changes, including a bankruptcy protection filing in 2022, leading to a restructuring process [5] Group 3: Financial Performance and Challenges - Lumileds is projected to generate $589 million in revenue with a loss of $67 million in 2024, and $141 million in revenue with a loss of $17 million in Q1 2025 [9] - The company has high production costs and low gross margins, with gross margins of approximately 7.81% and 12.06% for 2024 and Q1 2025, respectively [10] - High operational costs and financial burdens from previous acquisitions have contributed to Lumileds' financial struggles [10] Group 4: Integration and Future Plans - Sanan plans to invest in automation, equipment upgrades, and market development to improve Lumileds' performance post-acquisition [11] - The company aims to reduce procurement costs and enhance operational efficiency through collaboration with Lumileds [11] - The acquisition is expected to be completed by Q1 2026, pending standard closing conditions [12]
1亿欧元!又一A股出海收购
Zhong Guo Ji Jin Bao· 2025-05-13 16:09
Group 1 - The core point of the article is that Dongshan Precision's subsidiary DSG plans to acquire 100% of the French GMD Group for approximately 100 million euros (about 814 million yuan) and will restructure its debt [2][5][7] - The acquisition aims to enhance Dongshan Precision's market share in the automotive parts sector and establish a presence in Europe, accelerating its globalization strategy [7][5] - GMD Group, established in 1986, is a leading French automotive parts contractor with an annual revenue of 1 billion euros and operates 46 factories across 12 countries, employing over 6,600 people [5][7] Group 2 - The transaction will involve a diversified debt restructuring plan, including cash purchase of some debts, debt-to-equity swaps, and shareholder loans to optimize GMD Group's debt structure [5][7] - Dongshan Precision reported a revenue of 8.602 billion yuan for Q1 2025, a year-on-year increase of 11.07%, and a net profit of 456 million yuan, up 57.55% year-on-year [7] - The acquisition is not classified as a related party transaction and is not expected to constitute a major asset restructuring according to preliminary calculations [5][7]