Workflow
过劳死
icon
Search documents
张雪峰离世,敲响投资圈的“过劳”警钟
母基金研究中心· 2026-03-25 08:47
消息传开,很多人不敢相信。当天早上7点多,张雪峰还依然活跃在直播间里。根据央视新闻 的报道,3月24日中午12点26分,张雪峰在公司跑步后出现不适,被紧急送往医院,遗憾离 世。 据北京安贞医院双心医学中心发布的《心源性猝死》科普,心源性猝死是由于心血管系统病变 而引发的意识突然丧失、呼吸停止、心音及大动脉搏动消失,往往会在发病后1小时内死亡。 但在突发事件之前,其实心源性猝死的患者就已经潜在地产生了诸如冠心病、心力衰竭、心肌 炎等心血管问题,只是尚未表现出来。 在2023年6月24日晚,张雪峰就曾因过度劳累、胸闷心悸,被医院收治,强制住院。而这次, 在高强度工作后,张雪峰因在公司跑步后出现不适送医,最终抢救无效。 就在事发两天前,他还在朋友圈打卡:3月22日,7公里,当月累计72公里。 这种"过劳-补偿性激烈运动"模式常见于IT、金融、媒体等行业。 "过劳死在金融业和学术界也并不少见。企业和机构在合法前提下以高薪吸引员工从事高强度 工作,本身是劳动市场的自然选择。员工可以选择薪水较低的轻松工作,但更多人还是抱着对 优势企业的高薪和前景的向往,自愿接受加班的代价。"有学者指出。 2026年3月24日,张雪峰因心 ...
猝死程序员妻子最新发声:继续为高广辉维权,追讨 7 年加班费,已起诉 2 个造谣者
程序员的那些事· 2026-03-13 14:57
Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the case of Gao Guanghui, who was recognized as having died from work-related causes, highlighting the challenges faced in obtaining this recognition and the broader implications for labor rights and corporate responsibility in the context of overwork and hidden overtime [3][4][7]. Group 1: Work-Related Death Recognition - Gao Guanghui's death was officially recognized as a work-related injury on February 13, 2026, after a lengthy and challenging process [3][7]. - The recognition process faced significant hurdles, including the classification of work hours, work location, and the nature of work performed, with strict regulations complicating the situation [3][9]. - The company employed a "non-fixed working system" to evade responsibility, lacking necessary documentation to support this classification, and had not paid any overtime for seven years [3][10][12]. Group 2: Legal and Corporate Accountability - Gao's widow has filed legal claims regarding health rights, mishandling of personal belongings, and unpaid overtime, while also pursuing action against online defamers [4][12]. - The company has not made any institutional changes to prevent similar incidents and continues to recruit new employees, raising concerns about its commitment to employee welfare [14][16]. - There have been reports of three employee deaths within the company by 2025, indicating a troubling pattern that requires further investigation [14].