Group 1 - The core argument revolves around the comparison of the value of the Chinese Yuan (RMB) and the US Dollar (USD), highlighting that the RMB has not consistently appreciated over the decades, with a significant depreciation observed from 1979 to 2025 [2] - The concept of purchasing power parity (PPP) is discussed as a valuable tool for evaluating a country's economic balance, but it is argued that using PPP to define the actual exchange rate of RMB against USD is flawed, as it does not account for international pricing mechanisms [4] - The article emphasizes that while PPP can serve as a reference tool, it cannot fully capture the dynamic nature of market conditions, supply and demand, and the real value of currencies [6] Group 2 - The long-standing trade deficit between China and the US is attributed to China's low labor costs and high purchasing power, which does not necessarily indicate that the RMB is more valuable [8] - The article points out that the low living costs in China, combined with a hardworking population, have led to overcapacity and squeezed corporate profits, raising questions about the true value of labor in the market [8] - The potential for a financial crisis is mentioned if foreign exchange controls are lifted, suggesting that the true value of the RMB would be tested in a freely convertible currency environment [8]

Core Viewpoint - The article emphasizes the futility of trying to change stubborn individuals, highlighting that engaging with them often leads to personal exhaustion and frustration rather than productive outcomes [6][31][74] Group 1 - The concept of "backfire effect" is introduced, indicating that attempts to correct a stubborn person's views often reinforce their original beliefs [6][7] - Personal anecdotes illustrate the emotional toll of arguing with inflexible individuals, leading to stress and health issues [19][54] - Historical examples, such as Darwin's experience with critics, demonstrate that focusing on one's own work rather than engaging with the obstinate can be more beneficial [23][29] Group 2 - The article advises against prolonged engagement with stubborn individuals, suggesting that it is better to conserve energy for more rewarding interactions [36][44] - It discusses the importance of prioritizing personal well-being over the need to convince others, advocating for a focus on self-care and mental health [57][70] - The narrative concludes with the idea that true wellness comes from avoiding unnecessary conflicts and investing time in meaningful relationships [72][75]

Core Viewpoint - The article emphasizes the importance of cognitive awareness and emotional stability in professional settings, highlighting how narrow-mindedness can lead to emotional outbursts and hinder personal and professional growth [3][10][31]. Group 1: Cognitive Awareness - Individuals with low cognitive awareness often believe they are always right and are resistant to feedback, which can lead to conflicts and negative outcomes in their careers [9][15]. - The concept of "backfire effect" is introduced, indicating that attempts to correct a self-righteous person often reinforce their beliefs and increase their resistance to change [15][19]. - The article illustrates that those with a broader perspective can manage their emotions better and are more open to learning from experiences [17][21]. Group 2: Emotional Stability - Emotional stability is linked to a person's ability to accept differing viewpoints and adapt to new information, which is crucial for professional success [19][30]. - The narrative includes examples of individuals who reacted differently to criticism, showcasing how a positive mindset can lead to growth and advancement, while a negative mindset can result in stagnation [18][28]. - The article concludes that true wisdom comes from recognizing one's limitations and maintaining an open-minded approach to learning and collaboration [33].