Core Points - The U.S. has increased tariffs on Brazilian goods from 10% to 50%, effective August 6, 2023, as a means of political pressure on Brazil [1][3] - Brazil's government and experts express strong dissatisfaction with the U.S. tariff policy, emphasizing a commitment to diversify trade partnerships and enhance cooperation with Global South countries [1][6] - The tariff measures are seen as politically motivated, intersecting with sensitive judicial and political issues in Brazil [4][6] Group 1 - The U.S. tariffs are being used as a tool for economic and political pressure, particularly related to the legal situation of former President Jair Bolsonaro [3] - Brazil has formally requested consultations with the World Trade Organization, claiming that U.S. measures violate multilateral trade rules [6] - The Brazilian government is actively seeking to diversify its export markets and deepen economic cooperation with Europe and other BRICS nations to reduce reliance on the U.S. market [6][7] Group 2 - The increase in tariffs has led to a temporary oversupply of Brazilian goods that were previously exported to the U.S., while American consumers face rising prices and increased living costs [7] - Economists warn that using trade as a pressure tool undermines global economic stability and erodes diplomatic trust between nations [7]

Group 1 - The rise of the BRICS mechanism highlights the declining global influence of Western countries, with Global South nations moving from the periphery to the core of global governance [1] - Trump's recent threat to impose an additional 10% tariff on countries aligning with "anti-American policies" signals a direct confrontation with the BRICS mechanism [1][3] - The definition of "anti-American policies" is subjective and can be manipulated by the U.S. to suppress dissenting nations, as seen in the criticism of U.S. tariffs by BRICS nations [3] Group 2 - Trump's tariff strategy aims to isolate BRICS countries and deter other nations from joining this cooperative framework, despite the recent successful BRICS summit in Brazil [5] - India's unexpected support for the joint statement at the BRICS summit indicates a strategic shift towards collaboration within the BRICS framework to counter U.S. pressure [5] - The U.S. tariff threats are part of a broader defense of dollar hegemony, while BRICS initiatives like local currency settlements challenge the dominance of the dollar [7] Group 3 - The successful BRICS summit and India's changing stance signal a united response from the Global South against unilateralism, potentially leading to a new international balance [7]

Core Viewpoint - The Chinese government emphasizes the importance of the BRICS mechanism as a platform for promoting unity and cooperation among Global South countries, advocating for multilateralism and fair development [1] Group 1 - The Chinese side is committed to actively participating in BRICS cooperation and supports Brazil in hosting a successful summit [1] - The focus is on maintaining an open, inclusive, and cooperative spirit while striving for unity and common development [1] - The Chinese government views BRICS as a significant force in driving changes in the global governance system [1]