青少年社交媒体禁令
Search documents
青年早新闻 | 日本民众排长队告别大熊猫,每批只能看1分钟
Zhong Guo Qing Nian Bao· 2025-12-17 01:44
今天是12月17日,中国青年报"青年早新闻"来了——"青年关注、关注青年"!几分钟速览最新热点,带 你走近"宝藏学校"、触达"青春团讯"、学习"榜样人物"、了解"服务动态"。 日本民众排长队告别大熊猫,每批只能看1分钟 综合央视新闻、极目新闻,最后两只旅日大熊猫"晓晓"和"蕾蕾"将于2026年年初回国。大批日本民众12 月16日来到上野动物园和它们告别。 △剪辑:张力友 素材:央视新闻、视觉中国 根据上野动物园安排,从16日起对熊猫区参观人数进行一定限制。16日早上,距离开园时间还有1个多 小时,就已有大批民众在园区门口排队等待。 △当地时 间12月16日,日本东京,上野动物园,游客排队参观大熊猫"晓晓"和"蕾蕾"。图片来源:视觉中国 △当地时 间12月16日,日本东京,上野动物园内,大熊猫"晓晓"正在吃竹子。图片来源:视觉中国 开园后,熊猫观览区分批引导游客入内,每批游客设定1分钟左右的观看时间。 记者:"晓晓"和"蕾蕾"即将回中国了。您现在是怎样的心情呢? Facebook、Instagram等数十个社交媒体平台,都不允许他们再用了。澳大利亚政府当天实施的《网络安 全/社交媒体最低年龄修正案》要求,这些平 ...
澳大利亚实施首个青少年社交媒体禁令 引发世界各国关注
Xin Lang Cai Jing· 2025-12-10 13:20
Core Points - Australia has become the first country to officially ban users under 16 from accessing major social media platforms, a move that is expected to attract global attention from tech companies and policymakers [1][3] - The ban, effective from midnight local time, targets 10 major social media platforms including YouTube, Instagram, TikTok, Reddit, Snapchat, and X [1][3] - The policy requires these platforms to take "reasonable steps" to prevent minors from accessing their services, utilizing methods such as online activity inference, facial estimation through selfies, uploading identification, or linking bank details for age verification [1][3] - All targeted platforms have agreed to comply with the policy to some extent, with X being one of the last holdouts before agreeing to follow the regulations [1][3] - The policy is expected to result in millions of Australian children losing access to their social media accounts, and it may set a precedent for other governments considering similar bans, including Denmark, Norway, France, Spain, Malaysia, and New Zealand [1][3] Controversial Launch - Prior to the legislation's passage, a YouGov survey indicated that 77% of Australians supported the ban on social media for those under 16 [4] - Despite the support, the implementation of the law has faced some resistance since its enactment [4] - Proponents of the law argue that it protects children from social media-related harms, including cyberbullying, mental health issues, and exposure to predators and pornographic content [4][5]