用"吃啥啥不剩，干啥啥不行"来形容欧洲的行为，真的一点不为过。欧洲在俄乌冲突中的所作所为，常常让外界难以理解。近期，欧盟外交部长卡拉斯在公 开场合说了一句话："不打疼俄罗斯，普京是不会上谈判桌的。"这话听起来很有底气，但问题是，欧洲到底凭什么能"打疼"俄罗斯呢？更重要的是，卡拉斯 最好别忘了，欧洲现在在解决乌克兰冲突上，连"上谈判桌"的资格都没有。 事实上，自俄乌冲突爆发以来，关于派兵入乌对俄开战的讨论就没有停止过。如今，这些言论虽然依旧存在，但已经逐渐转变为在战后派兵入乌"维和"的呼 声。即便如此，特朗普提出的"28点计划"还是把欧洲国家在战后派兵入乌维和的资格给剥夺了。在这种背景下，欧洲各国近期不断对俄罗斯发出战争威胁， 并不意味着他们真打算为了乌克兰与俄罗斯开战。相反，这些举动只是政治姿态，目的是给乌克兰壮胆，鼓动泽连斯基拒绝接受美国提出的停火协议。 然而，问题的关键是，当前俄乌冲突的局势已经由美俄两国主导，而非欧洲。特朗普在3日表示，俄美两国已经达成共识，但他拒绝透露会谈的核心内容， 只告诉媒体："就像跳探戈一样，需要两个人的配合。"也就是说，只要美俄谈妥了，其他的一切都变得不那么重要。与此同时，美国 ...

Core Points - The meeting between Russian President Putin and US representatives, including special envoy Witkoff and Jared Kushner, focused on the "peace plan" for Ukraine and lasted nearly five hours, with discussions on territorial issues but no public disclosure of the substantive content [1][10] - Russian Assistant Ushakov indicated that there is currently no compromise solution for the Ukraine issue, with some US proposals being acceptable while others are not suitable for Russia [1][10] - The negotiations appear to be challenging, with Russia outlining three non-negotiable pillars regarding territorial control, military limitations, and sovereignty recognition [16][18] Group 1: Meeting Details - The meeting took place in the Kremlin and was described as constructive and beneficial, with discussions on territorial issues [1][10] - Prior to the meeting, the US representatives had lunch at a Michelin-starred restaurant and took a brief walk in Red Square [3][12] Group 2: Negotiation Documents - The negotiations centered around a previously circulated "28-point plan," but multiple documents were presented during the talks, including a modified version with 27 points [5][14] - Ushakov mentioned that the US submitted four new documents during the meeting, which were discussed in terms of their essence rather than specific wording [5][14] Group 3: Russian Stance - Russia's three non-negotiable demands include: 1. Full control of the Donbas region by Russia [8][17] 2. Limitations on the size of the Ukrainian armed forces, with a preference for a cap lower than the previously discussed 600,000 [8][17] 3. Formal recognition of Russia's sovereignty over its controlled territories by the US and Europe under international law [8][18] - Ushakov emphasized that without a resolution to the territorial issues, the Kremlin believes there is no solution to the crisis [18] Group 4: Ukrainian Response - Ukrainian President Zelensky confirmed that the US's new version of the peace agreement has been reduced from 28 points to 20, with eight points removed after several rounds of negotiations [10][18] - Zelensky expressed willingness to continue dialogue with US representatives, emphasizing that any agreements must involve Ukraine directly and cannot be decided without its participation [19]

Core Points - The recent developments in the Russia-Ukraine peace process indicate a shift towards a more structured negotiation framework, with the U.S. proposing a 28-point plan that was later condensed to a 19-point plan during discussions in Geneva [1][2] - The discussions emphasize the importance of maintaining the current "contact line" as a consensus among the U.S., EU, and Ukraine, which could potentially lead to a ceasefire [3] - The proposal from the EU for Ukraine to commit to not using military means to reclaim occupied territories suggests a strategic move to isolate Russia further while maintaining pressure for territorial integrity [3] Summary by Sections U.S. and International Involvement - The U.S. has been actively involved in the peace negotiations, with President Trump approving a 28-point plan that was quickly modified to a 19-point plan following discussions with European and Ukrainian representatives [1][2] - The U.S. Secretary of State Rubio described the recent U.S.-Ukraine talks as constructive, although specific outcomes were not disclosed [2] Key Agreements and Proposals - A significant consensus appears to be the maintenance of the current "contact line," which may be acceptable to Russia, laying the groundwork for a potential ceasefire [3] - The EU's proposal for Ukraine to refrain from military actions to reclaim occupied territories is seen as a tactical maneuver to continue sanctions against Russia while pushing for territorial return [3] Future Considerations - The discussions around the establishment of a "reassurance force" led by the UK and France indicate ongoing international military support for Ukraine post-conflict, although the specifics remain unclear [2][3] - The potential for a UN-led peacekeeping force to monitor the ceasefire could emerge as a counterproposal from Russia, highlighting the complexities of international military involvement [4]

Core Points - The recent developments in the Russia-Ukraine peace process indicate a shift towards a more structured negotiation framework, with the U.S. proposing a 28-point plan that was later condensed to a 19-point plan during discussions in Geneva [2][3] - The discussions have been characterized by a tight schedule, with significant information being leaked, leading to a lack of transparency regarding the specific contents of the 19-point plan [3] - Key agreements include the reaffirmation that any future agreements must fully uphold Ukraine's sovereignty, and the proposal from the EU suggesting Ukraine should not use military means to reclaim occupied territories [5][6] Group 1 - The U.S. 28-point plan initially required Ukraine to withdraw from the Donbas region and for Russia to relinquish control of several territories, but the current situation shows both sides are unwilling to concede territory [6] - The consensus among the U.S., EU, and Ukraine appears to be maintaining the status quo along the "contact line," which could lay the groundwork for a ceasefire [6][7] - The proposal for a "reassurance force" led by the UK and France aims to provide security guarantees for Ukraine post-conflict, although its feasibility remains uncertain [5][7] Group 2 - The discussions have highlighted the reluctance of both Ukrainian President Zelensky and former President Trump to meet directly, indicating a complex political landscape where sensitive issues are deferred to higher-level negotiations [8] - The potential for a UN peacekeeping force to monitor the ceasefire has been suggested, which could involve a diverse composition of nations rather than solely Western countries [7][8]

Core Points - The meeting in Geneva between US and Ukrainian representatives aimed to bridge differences regarding the US-proposed "28-point plan" to end the Russia-Ukraine conflict, with discussions on modifying the plan [1][2] - US Secretary of State Rubio expressed optimism about the progress made during the talks, indicating that unresolved issues are not insurmountable [2][3] - A joint statement from the US and Ukraine highlighted the commitment to a revised peace framework that respects Ukraine's sovereignty and aims for lasting peace [3] Group 1: Meeting Outcomes - The US and Ukraine are working on an updated peace framework agreement, with both sides agreeing to expedite discussions in the coming days [3] - Rubio's comments suggested a positive outlook on the negotiations, with European representatives also expressing satisfaction with the outcomes [3] - The European nations prepared a "counter-proposal" to the US plan, suggesting modifications such as increasing the limit on Ukraine's military size and addressing territorial negotiations based on current frontlines [4] Group 2: European Involvement - European countries have been criticized for their lack of a strong voice in the peace process, but they have now proposed amendments to the US plan [4][5] - The EU has set key standards for any peace agreement, emphasizing that borders should not be changed by force and that Ukraine's sovereignty must be maintained [4] - There are differing opinions within Europe regarding the approach to the negotiations, with some leaders urging support for the US plan as a significant opportunity to end the conflict [5] Group 3: Challenges and Perspectives - The ongoing conflict has seen significant territorial gains by Russian forces, raising concerns about Ukraine's prospects and the urgency for a peace agreement [6] - Experts suggest that a structured and confidential negotiation process is essential for a successful resolution, which is currently lacking [7] - The core issues, including the expansion of Western military alliances and Ukraine's demilitarization, must be addressed for a lasting peace to be achieved [7]

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the ongoing negotiations regarding Trump's "28-point plan" to end the Russia-Ukraine conflict, highlighting the differing reactions from Ukraine, Russia, and European leaders, as well as the potential implications for future diplomatic efforts [1][3][5]. Group 1: Negotiation Dynamics - The U.S. and Ukraine representatives met in Geneva to discuss Trump's proposed peace plan, with Trump emphasizing that Zelensky must accept the plan by the deadline of the 27th or face continued conflict [1][3]. - Zelensky has indicated that Ukraine will propose alternative options to Trump's plan, reflecting the pressure Ukraine is under to make difficult choices [4][5]. - Russian President Putin has expressed that the plan could serve as a basis for a final peace solution, although he noted that the U.S. has not yet secured Ukraine's agreement [4][6]. Group 2: European Response - European leaders welcomed the U.S. efforts but stated that the plan requires further refinement, emphasizing the importance of not altering international borders through force [5][6]. - European media have criticized the plan, labeling it as a "surrender plan" for Ukraine and expressing concerns over U.S. disregard for European interests [5][6]. - The joint statement from European leaders reflects a cautious approach, acknowledging the need for unity while also recognizing the complexities introduced by the U.S. proposal [5].

Group 1 - Ukraine's President Zelensky has approved a delegation to participate in negotiations in Switzerland regarding the "28-point" new plan aimed at ending the conflict with Russia [1] - U.S. officials, including Middle East envoy and Secretary of State, are set to meet with Ukraine in Geneva to discuss the plan [1][2] - European leaders, including national security advisors from the UK, France, and Germany, will also attend the talks in Switzerland [2] Group 2 - President Trump expressed hope that Ukraine would accept the U.S. proposal by the 27th of the month, indicating a potential delay if necessary [2] - Trump emphasized that if Zelensky does not agree to the U.S.-backed peace plan, the conflict will continue, highlighting the unprecedented scale of casualties since World War II [3] - The "28-point" plan, drafted by the White House, includes demands for Ukraine to withdraw from certain areas in Donetsk, which Ukraine has previously rejected [3] Group 3 - Zelensky acknowledged the difficult choices Ukraine faces, stating that they must either lose dignity or risk losing key partners [3] - Following discussions with U.S. Vice President, Zelensky agreed to collaborate with the U.S. and Europe on national security matters to make peace viable [3] - Experts suggest Ukraine is in a challenging diplomatic environment, particularly regarding territorial and security guarantees [3] Group 4 - The EU leaders issued a joint statement recognizing the "28-point" plan as a basis for future discussions but noted the need for further refinement [4] - Concerns were raised about proposals in the plan that could limit Ukraine's military capabilities, potentially jeopardizing its long-term security [4] - European countries are reportedly evaluating the plan and developing alternative proposals to ensure a sustainable peace process [4] Group 5 - The EU is discussing the establishment of "compensation loans" using frozen Russian state assets, with approximately €140 billion held in Belgium [5] - The discussions around the "28-point" plan may complicate the EU's consensus on the loan mechanism, potentially increasing financial risks for European taxpayers [5] - The ongoing discussions indicate a new complex phase in the Ukraine crisis, intertwining regional security, European strategic autonomy, and major power relations [5] Group 6 - The Russian Defense Ministry reported advances in military operations, with Russian forces capturing multiple buildings in eastern Ukraine [6] - Ukrainian armed forces have successfully repelled numerous attacks from Russian troops in various regions [6] - Ukrainian special forces claimed to have shot down a Russian helicopter using a drone in the Rostov region [6]

Group 1 - Russian military claims to have taken control of the eastern Ukrainian city of Kupiansk, marking a significant advance in their offensive [1][2] - Ukrainian President Zelensky expresses willingness to discuss the "28-point plan" proposed by the US and Russia to end the conflict, indicating a potential shift in diplomatic efforts [1][6] - The Russian military reports that approximately 15 Ukrainian battalions are encircled around Kupiansk, with many soldiers considering surrender [4] Group 2 - The "28-point plan" may involve significant territorial concessions from Ukraine, a reduction in military size, and restrictions on long-range weaponry, although specific details remain undisclosed [6][8] - The US supports the new plan, with ongoing revisions, while the Russian side has not provided new information regarding the initiative [8]