2025年3月3日，美国国际贸易委员会（ITC）投票决定对特定用于液晶显示器的玻璃基板及其下游产品 和制造此类基板的方法II（Certain Glass Substrates for Liquid Crystal Displays, Products Containing the Same, and Methods for Manufacturing the Same II）启动337调查（调查编码：337-TA-1441）。 2025年9月30日，美国国际贸易委员会（ITC）发布终裁：对本案行政法官于2025年7月15日作出的初裁 （No.28）不予复审，即基于和解，终止本案对列名被告美国VIZIO, Inc. of Irvine, CA的调查。 2025年8月6日，美国国际贸易委员会（ITC）发布终裁：对本案行政法官于2025年7月15日作出的初裁 （No.24）不予复审，即基于和解，终止本案对列名被告中国广东HKC Corporation Ltd. of China惠科股 份有限公司、中国香港HKC Overseas Ltd. of China的调查。 据中国贸易救济信息网消息，2025年12月23日， ...

来源：Ai\x26amp；芯片那点事儿 近日，美国国际贸易委员会（USITC）在发布公告，将针对AMD、联想和超微电脑启动了"337调查"， 理由是涉嫌侵犯美国知识产权公司Adeia及其子公司的专利。 USITC指出，将依照1930年《关税法》第337条启动特定半导体装置、含该等装置的计算产品及其零组 件的调查，该案主要依据Adeia Semiconductor Bonding Technologies 、 Adeia Holdings以及Adeia公司于 2025年11月17日提出的申诉而立案，并于2025年11月26日、 12月4日及12月5日提出补充文件。 Adeia指控称，AMD、联想和超微电脑在进口至美国及于美国境内销售特定半导体装置、含该等装置之 计算产品及其零组件时，侵犯了其所主张的专利权，构成违反1930年《关税法》第337条。 目前涉及的四项专利涵盖芯片堆叠结构、热管理方案、异质整合等技术，涉及高性能处理器、服务器主 机板，更是当前数据中心、AI加速器、高阶PC的关键应用。Adeia更是直接向ITC申请有限排除令与禁 止令两大杀手锏。 美国国际贸易委员会指出，将启动本案调查，案号337-TA ...

一纸调查令，覆盖从面板到电视整条产业链。当中国显示产业在全球份额突破70%之际，一场蓄谋已久 的系统性狙击已然开始。 2025年11月24日，美国国际贸易委员会（简称ITC）的一纸立案决定：对特定液晶器件启动337调查 （案号337-TA-1462）。 被告名单几乎覆盖产业链核心玩家：中国的惠科、TCL、海信、创维，韩国的LG，美国的西屋电气等 数十家中外巨头一一在列。这远非一场普通的专利纠纷，而是一次覆盖全链条的精准打击。 突袭调查：覆盖全产业链的精准打击 ITC此次调查的范围被精准定义为 "特定液晶器件、组件及其下游产品"。 这意味着从一块LCD面板、背光模组，到一台完整的电视、显示器，甚至车载屏幕，只要相关技术方案 落入涉案专利的保护范围，都可能被波及。 值得关注的是，起诉方是三家低调却专业的"专利运营实体"：美国BH Innovations LLC、爱尔兰 Longitude Licensing Limited和138 East LCD Advancements Ltd.他们主张被告产品侵犯其两项美国专利， 并要求ITC发布最具杀伤力的有限排除令和禁止令。 一旦认定侵权，相关产品将被彻底挡在美国市场之 ...

人民财讯12月11日电，2025年12月10日，美国国际贸易委员会(ITC)发布公告称，对特定无线通信设备 及其组件(Certain Wireless Communication Devices and Components Thereof，调查编码：337-TA-1429)作 出337部分终裁：对本案行政法官于2025年9月29日作出的初裁(No.41)不予复审，即基于和解，终止对 列名被告美国HP,Inc.of Palo Alto,CA的调查。 ...

Core Points - The recent Section 337 complaint filed by BH Innovations LLC, Longitude Licensing Limited, and 138 East LCD Advancements Ltd. against Chinese display companies highlights the intensifying competition between U.S. and Chinese firms in the global display market [1][2] - The complaint involves allegations of patent infringement related to specific LCD devices and components, with several leading Chinese companies, including Huike, Hisense, and TCL, named as defendants [1][2] - The three complainants are classified as Non-Practicing Entities (NPEs), which typically do not manufacture products but instead acquire patents to pursue litigation for profit [1][2] Industry Analysis - The display industry is a critical component of the technology ecosystem, with new display materials playing a vital role in the value chain [2] - China's display industry has rapidly evolved, becoming the largest global hub, with an estimated market size of $108 billion in 2024, accounting for nearly half of the global market [2] - The number of Section 337 investigations has surged, with 48 cases in 2024, of which 24 involve Chinese companies, indicating a growing trend of legal challenges faced by these firms [2][3] Competitive Landscape - Major competitors, including Samsung Display, Epson, and AU Optronics, have increasingly utilized Section 337 investigations and patent lawsuits against Chinese panel manufacturers [3] - The ongoing legal actions are seen as tactics by international competitors to slow down the progress of Chinese display companies as they gain market share and influence [3] Response from Chinese Companies - Chinese display companies are demonstrating a more mature and assertive approach in defending their rights amid rising international competition [4] - Huike, for instance, has established a significant technological advantage with 7,418 patents, particularly in the large-size display panel sector [5] - Chinese manufacturers now control approximately 70% of global LCD production capacity and are focusing on high-end products, including Mini-LED technology, to enhance their market position [6] Innovation and Future Outlook - Continuous innovation and increased R&D investment are essential for Chinese display companies to navigate external risks and maintain competitiveness in the global market [6] - The outcome of the ongoing patent disputes will be closely monitored, but the established Chinese display industry is expected to face challenges with confidence and resilience [6]

Core Points - The U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC) has initiated a "337 investigation" into specific LCD display devices and their components, involving several well-known companies including TCL, Hisense, LG, and VIZIO [1][2] - The investigation is based on allegations of patent infringement, specifically concerning two U.S. patents held by a group of complainants that includes BH Innovations LLC and two Irish companies [2] Group 1: Investigation Details - The investigation is identified as case number 337-TA-1462 and is focused on claims of unfair imports related to intellectual property violations [1] - The complainants allege that certain companies have infringed on their patents while importing and selling specific LCD devices in the U.S. market [2] - The involved companies include multiple Chinese enterprises and their affiliates, as well as international firms like LG and VIZIO [2] Group 2: Legal Process - The 337 investigation process resembles civil litigation, involving stages such as application, filing, evidence disclosure, hearings, and potential ITC rulings [2] - If the ITC finds infringement, it may issue a "limited exclusion order" to prevent specific infringing products from entering the U.S. market [2] - The timeline for responding to the investigation is tight, with only 30 days allowed for companies to submit their defenses, highlighting the urgency of legal representation [3]

Core Viewpoint - The U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC) has initiated a "337 investigation" into specific liquid crystal devices and components, targeting several Chinese companies, including Huike, Hisense, and TCL, as well as international firms like LG and Westinghouse. This investigation stems from a complaint by BH Innovations LLC, alleging patent infringement on two U.S. patents [1][2]. Group 1: Investigation Details - The investigation was triggered by a complaint filed on August 29, claiming that certain products exported to and sold in the U.S. infringe on two U.S. patents (patent numbers 7,705,948 and 7,570,334). The ITC may issue exclusion and cease-and-desist orders if infringement is found [1]. - The implicated Chinese companies are significant players in the display industry, with Huike being a manufacturer of panels and terminal devices, while Hisense and TCL hold over 50% of the North American television market share [1]. Group 2: Involved Companies - The list of defendants includes numerous companies from various countries, such as: - Chinese companies: Guangdong Huike, Chongqing Huike, Hisense Group, TCL Electronics, and others [2]. - U.S. companies: HiSense US Corporation, VIZIO Holding Corp., TTE Technology Inc., LG Electronics USA, and Westinghouse Electric Corporation [3]. - Other international companies: TCL Smart Device (Vietnam) Co. Ltd. and LG Electronics, Inc. from South Korea [3]. Group 3: Industry Context - This is not the first instance of Chinese display companies facing a 337 investigation; Corning has previously initiated similar investigations against Chinese firms, focusing on patent barriers. Industry experts suggest that these investigations aim to curb the technological advancements of the Chinese display industry, particularly after domestic companies have significantly reduced the prices of products like glass substrates [3]. Group 4: Response Strategies - Chinese companies are not without recourse; for instance, BOE successfully defended against a previous OLED patent investigation by engaging in proactive measures and patent invalidation strategies. The current defendants have also begun their response procedures, including filing for patent invalidation reviews with the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. However, the investigation process typically lasts 16-18 months, during which companies face high litigation costs and potential market share fluctuations [4].

Core Points - The U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC) has initiated a Section 337 investigation into certain liquid crystal devices and their components, following a complaint filed by BH Innovations LLC and others regarding patent infringement [1][2] - The investigation involves multiple companies, including several from China and the U.S., as defendants in the case [2] - The ITC is expected to determine the end date of the investigation within 45 days of the case being filed, with remedies issued becoming effective 60 days after publication unless blocked by the U.S. Trade Representative [3] Group 1 - The ITC has voted to start a Section 337 investigation into specific liquid crystal devices and components [1] - The complaint alleges infringement of U.S. registered patents 7,705,948 and 7,570,334 [1] - The companies involved in the investigation include major players from China, the U.S., and South Korea [2] Group 2 - The ITC will set the investigation's conclusion date within 45 days of the filing [3] - Remedies issued by the ITC in Section 337 cases take effect 60 days after publication unless vetoed by the U.S. Trade Representative [3]

Core Points - The U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC) issued a final ruling on November 20, 2025, regarding certain video-capable devices, terminating investigations based on the withdrawal of the applicant [1] - The ITC's earlier preliminary rulings on September 5 and September 22, 2025, were also not reviewed, leading to the termination of investigations related to multiple patent claims [2] - Nokia Technologies Oy and Nokia Corporation filed a complaint with the ITC on April 11, 2025, alleging patent infringement against several companies [3] - The defendants named in the case include Acer America Corporation, Acer Inc., ASUSTeK Computer Inc., Hisense Group, and Hisense USA Corporation [4] Summary by Category ITC Rulings - The ITC's final ruling on November 20, 2025, confirmed the termination of investigations into specific patent claims due to the applicant's withdrawal [1] - The ITC did not review preliminary rulings made on September 5 and September 22, 2025, which also resulted in the termination of investigations into various patent claims [2] Patent Infringement Claims - Nokia Technologies Oy and Nokia Corporation initiated a 337 investigation on April 11, 2025, claiming that certain products violated U.S. patent laws [3] Defendants - The companies named as defendants in the investigation include Acer America Corporation, Acer Inc., ASUSTeK Computer Inc., Hisense Group, and Hisense USA Corporation [4]

Core Points - BH Innovations LLC has filed a complaint with the U.S. International Trade Commission under Section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, alleging violations related to certain liquid crystal devices and components [1] - The complaint includes multiple Chinese companies as defendants, such as HKC Corporation Ltd. and Chongqing HKC Optoelectronics Technology Co., Ltd. [1] Summary by Category Legal Action - The complaint was filed on September 2, 2023, claiming that specific liquid crystal devices, components, and their downstream products exported to and sold in the U.S. violate U.S. trade laws [1] Involved Companies - The defendants listed in the complaint include several Chinese enterprises, notably HKC Corporation Ltd. and Chongqing HKC Optoelectronics Technology Co., Ltd. [1]