以下文章来源于未来图灵 ，作者张凤静 未来图灵 . 研究数据显示，Grok的用户群体平均每小时生成6700多张"脱衣"图像。而数字情报公司Peryton Intelligence的数据显示，仅在2026年1月2日当天，Grok就收到了199,612个独立的脱衣请求。面对 汹涌的舆论压力，X平台于1月9日宣布，图像生成功能仅对付费用户开放，并于1月15日正式发布安 全声明，禁止为真实人物生成暴露服装（如比基尼）的图片。 面对这一复杂难题，我们专访了北京师范大学新闻传播学院喻国明教授。身为北京师范大学新闻传播 学院学术委员会主任、教育部长江学者特聘教授，喻国明长期深耕技术、社会与人性的关系领域，凭 借其开创的"认知神经传播学"以及"社会安全阀""舆论代偿机制"等理论蜚声学界。他的剖析始终跳出 二元对立的桎梏，力求探寻兼具现实观照与建设性价值的平衡之道。 在本次访谈中，他开宗明义地指出，讨论的前提是必须严格区分"公共空间"与"私人空间"，成年人在 私域内的合理消费应受保护。但这绝非为技术滥用开脱。他犀利地指出"技术非绝对中立"，并提出了 清晰的"责罚相称"责任划分原则：有意为之的开发者应负主责。面对全球"监管碎片化 ...

Group 1 - The article highlights the misuse of AI technology, particularly in creating inappropriate content, leading to significant concerns for both ordinary individuals and public figures [1][6][10] - A surge in AI-generated content, such as "AI dressing" and "AI borderline" images, has become prevalent on social media platforms, attracting large audiences and followers [2][10][11] - The Central Cyberspace Affairs Commission has initiated actions to address the misuse of AI technology, focusing on seven key issues, including the production of pornographic content and impersonation [4][5] Group 2 - Ordinary individuals and public figures alike are victims of AI misuse, with cases of identity theft and defamation emerging from AI-generated content [6][8][9] - The prevalence of AI-generated "borderline" content on social media platforms raises concerns about copyright infringement and the potential for exploitation [10][12][22] - Various tutorials and guides are available on social media, instructing users on how to create and monetize AI-generated borderline content, indicating a growing trend in this area [13][16][22] Group 3 - Testing of 12 popular AI applications revealed that 5 could easily perform "one-click dressing" on celebrity images, raising concerns about copyright infringement [31][32][39] - Nine of the tested AI applications were capable of generating borderline images, with the ability to bypass content restrictions through subtle wording changes [40][41][42] - The article discusses the challenges faced by platforms in regulating AI-generated content, highlighting the need for improved detection and compliance measures [54][56][60] Group 4 - The article emphasizes the need for clearer legal standards and increased penalties for violations related to AI-generated content to deter misuse [57][59][60] - Recommendations for individuals facing AI-related infringements include documenting evidence and reporting to relevant authorities, underscoring the importance of legal recourse [61] - The article concludes that addressing the misuse of AI technology requires a multifaceted approach, including technological improvements and regulatory clarity [62]