Workflow
EV电池安全标准
icon
Search documents
中国瞄准EV电池安全标准的全球主导权
3 6 Ke· 2025-07-03 04:24
Core Points - China is set to revise its electric vehicle (EV) battery safety standards, making them stricter than current regulations, with a focus on preventing explosions or fires within two hours of a battery cell anomaly [2][3] - Major companies like CATL and BYD have already adapted their products to meet the new standards, while smaller firms may face challenges that could lead to their elimination from the market [5][9] - The new standards are part of China's strategy to gain global leadership in the EV battery sector, with implications for international business opportunities for Chinese manufacturers [9][6] Industry Response - The revised standards will require new testing methods, including internal heating tests to trigger thermal runaway, which are more rigorous than previous external heating and puncture tests [3] - CATL's "Qilin Battery" and BYD's "Blade Battery" have already met the new standards, indicating readiness among leading manufacturers [5] - The automotive sector, including companies like Nissan, is also adapting to the new regulations, with some vehicles already compliant [5] Market Implications - The frequency of EV-related fire incidents, particularly in South Korea, raises concerns about consumer trust in "Made in China" products, potentially affecting market share for Chinese companies [5][6] - In China, EVs and plug-in hybrid vehicles account for 50% of total passenger car sales, highlighting the growing importance of safety standards to boost consumer confidence [6] - The implementation of stricter standards may lead to a significant reduction in the number of battery manufacturers, with estimates suggesting a 30% decrease in production capacity by 2027 due to compliance costs [9][6]
中国瞄准EV电池安全标准的全球主导权
日经中文网· 2025-07-03 03:13
Core Viewpoint - China is set to revise its electric vehicle (EV) battery safety standards, making them stricter than current regulations, which may benefit domestic manufacturers in international markets if the new standards are recognized as globally superior [1][3][5]. Group 1: New Standards and Implications - The new standards, effective from July next year, require that battery cells do not explode or catch fire within two hours after an anomaly occurs, a significant tightening from the previous requirement of a five-minute warning after thermal runaway [1][3]. - Major companies like CATL and BYD have already adapted their products to meet the new standards, while smaller firms may face challenges that could lead to their exit from the market [1][3][6]. - The revision marks the first change in five years and reflects China's ambition to dominate the global EV battery sector [3][6]. Group 2: Testing and Compliance - The new testing methods include both traditional external heating and new internal heating tests to provoke thermal runaway, making compliance more challenging for manufacturers [3][4]. - Companies must demonstrate that their products meet these new standards through rigorous testing, which may increase operational costs significantly [4][6]. Group 3: Market Dynamics and Competition - The global market share of Chinese battery manufacturers, including CATL, is currently at 38.7%, closely competing with South Korean firms at 39.7% [4]. - Frequent EV fire incidents, particularly involving batteries from Chinese manufacturers, could undermine consumer trust in "Made in China" products, potentially affecting market share [4][6]. - The new standards aim to address safety concerns and promote the adoption of EVs among consumers who are skeptical about their safety [4][5]. Group 4: Future Outlook - The development of solid-state batteries is seen as a competitive frontier among Chinese, Japanese, and South Korean firms, with expectations for these batteries to be integrated into EVs by around 2030 [6]. - The implementation of stricter standards may lead to a reduction in production capacity among smaller battery manufacturers, with estimates suggesting a 30% decrease by 2027 due to high compliance costs [6].