H+A模式
Search documents
人形机器人第一股优必选16.65亿收购锋龙股份,创新“H+A”模式背后的产业链整合与两地资本市场联动
Ge Long Hui· 2025-12-31 00:56
实际上,这并非简单的控制权收购,而是一场通过"H控A"母子架构实现产业垂直整合与资本治理优化的双重战略布 局。这一操作不仅契合证监会"补链强链"的并购重组政策导向,更以清晰的业务分工、透明的资金路径和公平的权益 机制,有效避免了同业竞争、利益输送、暗箱操作等一系列问题,为行业高质量并购提供了可复制的优秀样本。 纵向整合破局:母子架构根治同业竞争,实现利益深度绑定 12月24日,港股上市公司优必选(9880.HK)公告披露,计划通过"协议转让+要约收购"的组合方式,收购深交所上市 公司锋龙股份(002931.SZ)约43%股权,对应股份数量合计约9395.75万股。 公告显示,本次控制权变更的股份转让及要约收购价格均为17.72元/股,较12月17日锋龙股份停牌前19.68元/股的价格 折让10%。据此测算,本次收购总对价为16.65亿元。 受此消息影响,12月25日锋龙股份复盘后即刻一字涨停,并接连实现四个交易日涨停(4连板),截至12月30日开盘 报28.82元/股。 这一跨粤港澳大湾区两地资本市场的重量级收购动作引发了两地资本市场关于"为何优必选在港股融资,选择布局A 股"的热议。 产业并购的核心矛盾,在 ...
★深圳有望试点红筹股二次上市 市场静待细则出台
Zheng Quan Shi Bao· 2025-07-03 01:56
Core Viewpoint - The recent issuance of the "Opinions on Deepening Reform and Innovation in the Shenzhen Comprehensive Reform Pilot" by the Central Committee and the State Council has sparked market interest, particularly regarding the policy allowing Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macao Greater Bay Area enterprises listed on the Hong Kong Stock Exchange to also list on the Shenzhen Stock Exchange [1] Group 1: Policy Implications - The "H+A" policy is seen as a key measure for financial collaboration in the Greater Bay Area, enhancing investor confidence in China's capital markets and technology assets [1][2] - The policy is expected to facilitate the return of high-quality technology companies from Hong Kong to A-shares, promoting high-quality development in China's capital markets [1][2] - The Shenzhen Stock Exchange is anticipated to become a more efficient listing channel for innovative enterprises through the potential trial of secondary listings for red-chip stocks [1][3] Group 2: Market Activity - The Hong Kong IPO market has seen significant activity in 2023, with an estimated 40 companies expected to go public, raising approximately HKD 1,087 billion [2] - Hong Kong's IPO fundraising accounted for 24% of the global total, while the combined share of Hong Kong and A-shares reached 33% [2] - The policy allowing Greater Bay Area enterprises to list on Shenzhen is expected to provide more diverse financing options and break existing market restrictions [2][3] Group 3: Listing Structures - The common structures for Hong Kong-listed companies include red-chip and H-share architectures, with red-chip companies being controlled by offshore registered holding companies [3] - The Shenzhen Stock Exchange has established clear standards for red-chip companies seeking secondary listings, requiring a market capitalization of at least RMB 200 billion [3][4] Group 4: Recommendations for Implementation - Experts suggest that detailed guidelines are needed for the return of red-chip stocks to A-shares, covering aspects such as market capitalization, profitability, corporate governance, and information disclosure [4] - Recommendations include refining standards for eligibility, promoting cross-border cooperation, and developing supporting financial instruments [4][5] Group 5: Attracting High-Tech Companies - As of June 15, 2023, there are 224 Hong Kong-listed companies based in the Greater Bay Area, with 328 companies having a market capitalization exceeding RMB 200 billion [5] - There is a call for the Shenzhen Stock Exchange to simplify the review process for high-tech companies returning from Hong Kong, potentially creating a green channel for eligible firms [5][6] - Suggestions include using non-financial metrics for listing standards for unprofitable high-tech companies and introducing a "hard technology index" to attract long-term investment [5][6]
深圳有望试点红筹股二次上市 市场静待细则出台
Zheng Quan Shi Bao· 2025-06-15 17:47
Core Viewpoint - The recent policy allowing companies from the Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macao Greater Bay Area that are listed on the Hong Kong Stock Exchange to also list on the Shenzhen Stock Exchange is seen as a significant step towards financial collaboration and enhancing investor confidence in China's capital markets [1][2]. Group 1: Policy Implications - The "H+A" model aims to enhance the integration of the Shenzhen Stock Exchange with the Hong Kong Stock Exchange, improving internationalization and resource allocation [2]. - The policy is expected to facilitate the return of high-quality technology companies from Hong Kong to the A-share market, thereby boosting investor confidence and supporting high-quality development of the capital market [1][2]. - The policy may provide a more efficient listing channel for innovative enterprises, particularly those with red-chip structures [1][4]. Group 2: Market Activity and Trends - The Hong Kong IPO market has seen significant activity, with an estimated 40 companies expected to go public in the first half of 2025, raising approximately 1,087 million HKD [2]. - Hong Kong's IPO fundraising accounted for 24% of the global total, while combined with A-shares, they represented 33% [2]. - The number of Hong Kong-listed companies based in the Greater Bay Area is 224, with 328 companies having a market capitalization exceeding 20 billion RMB [7]. Group 3: Listing Standards and Requirements - The Shenzhen Stock Exchange has set specific standards for red-chip companies seeking secondary listings, including a minimum market capitalization of 200 billion RMB and strong technological capabilities [5]. - The Growth Enterprise Market (GEM) has different criteria for red-chip companies, focusing on rapid revenue growth and a minimum market capitalization of 10 billion RMB or 5 billion RMB with certain revenue conditions [6]. - There is a need for detailed regulations regarding market capitalization, profitability, corporate governance, and investor protection for red-chip companies returning to A-shares [6]. Group 4: Recommendations for Implementation - Experts suggest refining standards for eligibility, enhancing cross-border cooperation, and developing supportive financial instruments to facilitate the return of Hong Kong-listed companies [6]. - Recommendations include establishing a "Hong Kong Return Service Center" in specific regions to support the return of companies and promote data sharing [6]. - Simplifying the review process for high-tech companies and considering non-financial metrics for listing standards are also proposed to attract more innovative firms [7].