委内瑞拉首都加拉加斯（资料图，reuters） "作为一个独立的主权国家，正面临严重的存亡危机"，古巴外长针对特朗普政府对委内瑞拉的攻击这样 表示。不仅是中南美和加勒比海的反美政府，连拥有格陵兰岛的丹麦等国也因担心成为"下一个目标"而 严阵以待…… 美国特朗普政府1月3日对委内瑞拉发动攻击后，担心成为"下一个目标"的国家正严阵以待。不仅是中南 美和加勒比海那些美国一直策划推翻的反美政府，连拥有美国总统特朗普有意夺取的格陵兰岛的丹麦等 国也出现动摇。 联合国安理会1月5日召开了有关美国攻击委内瑞拉的紧急会议。担心"继委内瑞拉之后轮到自己"的国家 纷纷批评美国违反《联合国宪章》。 哥伦比亚就是其中之一。特朗普声称该国打击毒品力度不足，威胁进行军事干预。哥伦比亚常驻联合国 代表扎拉巴塔批评称:"（美军的攻击）明显侵犯了委内瑞拉的主权、政治独立和领土完整"。与美国长 期敌对的伊朗的常驻联合国代表伊拉瓦尼也谴责称:"美国的非法行为是国家恐怖主义"。 美国常驻联合国代表华尔兹表示："特朗普曾提供外交机会，尝试缓和紧张局势。马杜罗总统予以拒 绝"，对本国的行动进行辩解。 美国的历届政府都有在中南美及加勒比海地区展开推翻反美 ...

在美国智库"美国指南针"创立纪念仪式上演讲的美国副总统万斯（2025年6月，Reuters） 飞田临太郎："万斯是一个让人觉得'我也能成为那个人'的人。在对于像英雄一样的特朗普总统来说很 困难的地方，他可能会让人产生共鸣"。在舆论调查中，支持万斯担任下一任总统的共和党支持者遥遥 领先…… 飞田临太郎： 美国副总统万斯周围正在聚集新一代保守势力。万斯是共和党的下届总统候选人的强有 力争夺者，展现出继承特朗普总统领导的"MAGA（让美国再次伟大）"运动，并部分采纳自由主义政策 的新保守姿态。 "万斯是一个让人觉得'我也能成为那个人'的人。在对于像英雄一样的特朗普总统来说很困难的地方， 他可能会让人产生共鸣"。 美国智库克莱蒙特研究所(the Claremont Institute)的副总裁Andrew Beck（音译：安德鲁・贝克）这样评 价万斯的领导形象。如果万斯政府上台，Andrew Beck被认为将担任要职。 克莱蒙特还向特朗普政府输送人才，在华盛顿迅速提高存在感。主张美国自建国以来，通过以基督教为 基础的价值观，培养了与邻居互相帮助的"美德"和"自豪感"。 认为最近数十年来，美国联邦政府过于重视自由主义思 ...

据多家媒体报道，当地时间12月1日，美国总统特朗普在其"真实社交"平台上疯狂发帖，短短数小时之 内竟发布了约150条帖子，内容不仅涵盖对第一夫人梅拉尼娅的赞美，还包括有关众议院民主党领袖南 希·佩洛西的阴谋论等内容。 在密集发帖结束后，特朗普在不到6个小时后，即2日清晨5点48分再次登录社交平台并发文称："真实社 交平台最棒！其他平台都无法与之相提并论！！！"据新华社报道，特朗普当天还在"真实社交"上发文 说，他将终止前总统拜登用自动签名笔签署的所有文件的有效性，包括赦免令。 在充斥着愤怒的众多帖子中，特朗普还发布了称赞第一夫人梅拉尼娅着装风格的视频。随后，特朗普转 发了一条评论："优雅、高贵、美丽。我们的第一夫人梅拉尼娅"。 特朗普还转发了一些"MAGA"（让美国再次伟大）盟友的赞扬言论，例如佛罗里达州共和党众议员拜伦 ·唐纳德斯的演讲视频。在视频中，唐纳德斯感谢上帝让哈里斯未能在2024年获胜，称赞特朗普为"有史 以来最伟大的总统"。 美国民主党意见领袖哈里·西森对此发文称："如果你的家人或朋友这样做，你肯定会想办法干预。特朗 普精神状态不好，显然他当时正处于认知衰退期。" 这并非特朗普首次因发帖次数过高 ...

Core Viewpoint - The internal generational conflict within political families in the U.S. is becoming more pronounced, reflecting broader societal shifts and the younger generation's discontent with traditional political stances [1][3]. Group 1: Family Dynamics - Nalin Haley, son of Nikki Haley, publicly opposes his mother's political views and aligns with Trump's MAGA movement, expressing a sentiment that his generation feels unrepresented [1][2]. - Nikki Haley, a prominent Republican figure, has maintained a low profile during Trump's second term, occasionally voicing support for moderate and conservative candidates [1][2]. Group 2: Policy Differences - Nalin Haley advocates for a more radical stance on immigration, calling for a complete halt to immigration, contrasting with his mother's support for a merit-based legal immigration system [2]. - In foreign policy, Nikki Haley supports traditional internationalism and aid to Ukraine, while Nalin argues for ending foreign aid to address domestic issues like unemployment and healthcare debt [2]. Group 3: Broader Political Trends - A Harvard Kennedy School poll indicates that young voters are increasingly pessimistic about the country's direction, with over 40% of those under 30 feeling they can barely maintain their living standards [3]. - The trend of younger family members publicly challenging their politically active relatives is not isolated, as seen in other political families, indicating a shift in political alignment among the youth [3].

Core Viewpoint - President Trump has filed a lawsuit against Rupert Murdoch and his media group, seeking $10 billion in damages due to the exposure of a nude drawing he sent in a birthday greeting to Jeffrey Epstein, a figure associated with high-profile sexual crimes [1] Group 1 - The lawsuit highlights the negative association of Epstein's name in the U.S., particularly among Trump's supporters who view it as linked to the "deep state" [1] - Trump's team has recently reversed its commitment to "thoroughly investigate the truth," leading to accusations of betrayal from his staunch supporters [1]

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the potential historical significance of the upcoming G7 summit, emphasizing the need for the U.S. to maintain its role in upholding international order despite its declining relative power [1][4]. Group 1: U.S. International Role and Policies - The G7 summit is seen as a critical platform for addressing the U.S.'s departure from international cooperation under Trump's administration, which is characterized by a return to high tariffs reminiscent of the 19th century [2][3]. - Trump's administration is marked by a significant shift towards isolationism, with a focus on unilateral national interests, raising concerns about the future of international collaboration [3][5]. - The historical context of the G7's formation in response to U.S. policies in the 1970s highlights the ongoing struggle to maintain multilateral cooperation amid U.S. challenges [3][5]. Group 2: Economic Context and Implications - The article notes that the G7's share of global economic output has fallen from over 60% in the 1970s to below 30% today, reflecting the rise of countries like China and India [5]. - The potential for G7 to address trade tensions and economic cooperation is underscored, with Canada aiming to avoid past conflicts by focusing on areas of mutual agreement rather than a unified declaration [6]. - The historical reference to the "Kindleberger Trap" illustrates the dangers of a lack of leadership in stabilizing the international economy, which could be exacerbated by current U.S. policies [6].

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the ongoing protests in Los Angeles against the Trump administration's aggressive immigration policies, particularly the arrest and deportation of undocumented immigrants and the deployment of the National Guard in the area [1][2]. Group 1: Immigration Policies - The U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) has initiated "Operation Safeguard," targeting undocumented immigrants for arrest and deportation, expanding its focus beyond those with criminal records to include individuals with work permits and those awaiting court hearings [1][2]. - The Trump administration has suspended immigration from 12 countries, including Afghanistan, Myanmar, and Iran, which has drawn international condemnation [1]. Group 2: Political Context - The shift from defensive to offensive immigration policies during Trump's second term is highlighted, with significant actions such as the deployment of National Guard troops to Los Angeles for large-scale operations against undocumented immigrants [2]. - The support from the MAGA movement, representing right-wing populism, is identified as a driving force behind Trump's immigration policies, reflecting his campaign promises [2].

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the implications of the U.S. administration's "America First" policy, particularly focusing on the impact of high tariffs and the potential for economic downturn and inflation, questioning whether current policies truly benefit the U.S. economy [1][2]. Group 1: Economic Policies and Trade - The U.S. has implemented the highest tariff rates since the 1930s, leading to a trade war with Europe and China, which may have adverse effects on the global economy [1][2]. - Concerns are raised about the potential for stagflation in the U.S. due to rising prices, economic recession, and inflation occurring simultaneously as a result of high tariffs [2]. - The article highlights the historical context of U.S. trade policies, noting that the abandonment of fixed exchange rates in the 1970s was a response to trade imbalances and that the U.S. has historically maintained a leadership role in the international economic system [2][4]. Group 2: Global Economic Standing - Despite concerns about trade deficits and manufacturing competitiveness, the U.S. remains the world's largest economy and ranks 12th in the 2024 World Competitiveness Ranking, outperforming other G7 countries and China [4]. - The article emphasizes that U.S. companies and universities consistently rank highly on global lists, indicating a strong economic foundation [4]. Group 3: Social and Domestic Policy Implications - The article argues that issues such as drug abuse and local economic decline should be addressed through domestic policies like income redistribution and healthcare, rather than through tariffs [4]. - It warns that high tariffs could exacerbate living conditions for low-income individuals and increase wealth disparity, with potential backlash against U.S. products in Canada and Europe [4]. Group 4: International Relations and Security - The article notes that the U.S.-Japan alliance has evolved into a key security partnership in the Asia-Pacific region, especially in light of China's military rise, and that economic attacks may weaken this alliance [5]. - It suggests that the U.S. should focus on strengthening alliances rather than undermining them through aggressive economic policies, as this could diminish U.S. soft power and the dollar's status as the world's reserve currency [5].