Workflow
深层政府
icon
Search documents
爱泼斯坦案谜团撕裂MAGA阵营
news flash· 2025-07-20 01:57
Core Viewpoint - President Trump has filed a lawsuit against Rupert Murdoch and his media group, seeking $10 billion in damages due to the exposure of a nude drawing he sent in a birthday greeting to Jeffrey Epstein, a figure associated with high-profile sexual crimes [1] Group 1 - The lawsuit highlights the negative association of Epstein's name in the U.S., particularly among Trump's supporters who view it as linked to the "deep state" [1] - Trump's team has recently reversed its commitment to "thoroughly investigate the truth," leading to accusations of betrayal from his staunch supporters [1]
特朗普给不出爱泼斯坦名单,MAGA怎么办?
Hu Xiu· 2025-07-19 06:44
虽然如果对特朗普没有什么滤镜的话,事前大概能猜到,爱泼斯坦案的调查不会有什么突破性结果,会公布一些看起来内容很复 杂,实际上关键内容涂黑,所以什么都没说的文件。但特朗普在这件事上的表态还是太惊世骇俗,他直接表示,爱泼斯坦名单不 存在,没人关心这玩意,这是民主党搞出来的阴谋。这直接把maga们整崩溃了。 爱泼斯坦案件毫无疑问是这几年美国政治的核心话题之一。其完美符合了右翼的阴谋论世界观,全球主义者不仅暗中统治世界, 个人道德还极度败坏。利用这个事件,特朗普成功动员了大量选民,打击了民主党的选情。毕竟统治世界是抽象的,但是对道德 败坏的攻击却是非常高效的。 当然,民主党高层这帮人道貌岸然,实际上却道德败坏,这点有良心的人都不会否认。但是道德败坏的远不止他们,共和党这帮 人就有什么区别吗?这种事情又不分驴象,说白了,两党都是差不多的。 就算说建制派都是坏人,那么特朗普本人呢?特朗普现在这个表现,很多MAGA心里边也犯嘀咕,觉得马斯克爆料说不定是真 的,特朗普也是参与者。甚至我们再往前一点,看看保守派的历史,宗教界一向和针对未成年人的犯罪密切相关。这事细说的 话,一下子就破坏了MAGA心里的道德优越感,自然就有反噬了 ...
白宫人事震荡!
21世纪经济报道· 2025-05-25 14:06
据新华社援引外媒报道,美国白宫国家安全委员会2 3日开始裁撤人员,职能"降级"。与此同 时,美国企业家、政府效率部负责人埃隆·马斯克2 4日则表示,他将花更多时间专注于自己的 公司,暗示他将减少在特朗普政府中的工作。 大幅裁员 职能"降级" 新华社5月2 5日消息,路透社援引多名消息人士的话报道说,当地时间2 3日,数十名美国国家 安全委员会人员被裁,场面混乱,在国家安全委员会所在地艾森豪威尔行政办公楼里,一些 即将离任的工作人员甚至落泪。 美国国家安全委员会创设于上世纪杜鲁门任美国总统时期。拜登政府任期内,该机构有3 0 0多 人。消息人士透露,预计裁员后最终仅留下约5 0人。 美国国家安全委员会向美国总统提供国家安全和对外政策建议,参与决策,并在多个政府部 门之间发挥协调作用。 路透社援引消息人士的话报道说,重组后,国家安全委员会的职能重点将是执行总统的计划 而不是参与决策制定。 国家安全委员会内设部门将裁撤、合并,职能将转移至国务院、国防部等其他部门。消息人 士称,原先负责处理非洲事务和处理北约等多边组织事务的部门将被合并。 美联社评论称,国防部和国务院今后将在向特朗普提供建议方面发挥更重要的作用,但特 ...
马斯克冲击波,到底怎么看?
虎嗅APP· 2025-03-03 10:08
Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the establishment and objectives of the Government Efficiency Department (DOGE) under Trump's administration, emphasizing its role in addressing the significant federal budget deficit and improving government efficiency through technology and data-driven decision-making [2][6][8]. Group 1: Government Efficiency Department Overview - The Government Efficiency Department was created by reorganizing the Obama-era U.S. Digital Service and aims to modernize federal government technology and software to maximize efficiency and productivity [5][6]. - The department has already made significant cuts, including reducing the staff of the U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID) from over 10,000 to fewer than 300 and closing the Chief Diversity Officer Executive Council [7][8]. - The department's goal is to eliminate waste, fraud, and abuse in government spending, leveraging AI and big data technologies [7][8]. Group 2: Financial Context and Challenges - The federal budget deficit for the fiscal year 2024 is projected to reach $1.83 trillion, the third highest in history, with net interest payments exceeding $882 billion, representing 3.06% of the U.S. GDP [10][11]. - The article highlights various inefficiencies in government spending, such as the slow processing of retirement applications and excessive expenditures by agencies like the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) [11][12]. - There are concerns about the accuracy of some data presented by the Government Efficiency Department, particularly regarding the Social Security system, which may misinterpret legacy programming issues as fraud [12][13]. Group 3: Reform Implications and Future Outlook - The collaboration between Trump and Musk is seen as a radical approach to reforming government operations, potentially leading to a new model of governance driven by technology and data [18][19]. - Critics argue that the reliance on inexperienced engineers for governance could lead to risks of mismanagement and loss of essential services [22][23]. - The article concludes that while the path to reform is fraught with challenges, the push for efficiency and transparency in government spending is a necessary endeavor that could reshape public governance [24][25].