美国外交协会发言人妮基·加默表示："自我们所知的美国外交部门成立以来，从未发生过如此大规模的 召回事件。"美国国务院的工作人员警告称，此举将导致一些重要的大使馆失去关键领导，还可能终结 许多职业外交官的职业生涯。相关报道指出，这些大使在被召回后仅有90天的时间找到新的职位，否则 就必须退休。 报道指出，特朗普政府计划将忠于新政府的官员安排至国务院的更高层级，以确保特朗普的"美国优 先"议程得到贯彻。特朗普长期以来一直批评美国政府内部存在"深层政府"，曾指责未经选举的职业官 员试图破坏他的总统任期，并在世界各地传播"自由主义价值观"。 经济观察网 据智通财经，当地时间12月22日报道，特朗普政府正召回近30名驻外大使和担任其他职务 的高级外交官，调整美国的外交机构人事布局。被召回人员主要来自美国驻非洲和亚洲的外交机构，均 是在拜登政府时期上任。 ...

这些被要求离任的使节几乎都是由前总统乔·拜登任命的职业外交官。知情人士透露，他们近日接到电 话通知，需要在未来几周内离任。 他们不会被解雇，但考虑到许多人已步入职业生涯后期，而高级外交官的岗位本就有限，因此转任新职 将面临不小难度。 一位国务院高级官员表示，此次召回属于常规程序，鼓励高级外交官在国务院系统内寻求新岗位，并且 总统唐纳德·特朗普有权确保美国高级特使贯彻其政策议程。这位官员拒绝透露被召回的外交官的具体 人数，但国务院内部流传的一份名单列出了近30人。 2025年11月5日，美国国务卿马尔科·卢比奥 （图中）抵达华盛顿特区国会大厦，听取有关委内瑞拉的简 报。 然而，此举打破了数十年来历届政府的惯例——即使白宫易主，新政府也通常会让职业外交官留任原 职。 美国驻外大使大致分为两类：一类是总统亲自挑选的政治任命大使，多为捐助者、前政客和总统亲信， 他们被派往巴黎、伦敦或东京等重要使馆任职，这通常是对他们支持的回报。这些大使几乎总是在提名 他们的总统卸任当天辞职。 而绝大多数美国大使馆由训练有素的职业外交官领导，他们隶属于美国外交系统，并会根据白宫当时优 先事项调整对外表态。他们也需要经过参议院的确认，而 ...

俄乌局势，有新变化！ 据最新消息，乌克兰武装部队21日称，受俄军快速推进影响，乌军已从苏梅州的克拉斯诺皮利亚靠近俄 乌边境的多个阵地撤出。同日，俄罗斯国防部表示，俄军正向乌军防御纵深推进。 此外，美国和乌克兰方面21日称，双方代表团以及欧洲方面过去3天的一系列会谈"富有成效和建设 性"。不过，俄罗斯总统助理乌沙科夫表示，俄、美、乌代表举行三方会晤一事"尚未被认真讨论"。 值得注意的是，美国国家情报总监图尔茜·加巴德当地时间12月20日发文，指责北约以及欧盟试图将美 国拖入与俄罗斯的直接对抗。 最新进展：乌军撤出多个阵地 当地时间21日，乌克兰武装部队称，受俄军快速推进影响，乌军已从苏梅州的克拉斯诺皮利亚靠近俄乌 边境的多个阵地撤出。目前，乌军仍在边境地带持续开展行动，消灭俄军有生力量，当前俄军正遭受乌 军火力打击。 俄罗斯国防部21日发布战报称，过去一天，俄军在各方向占据更有利防线和阵地，向乌军防御纵深推 进。俄军打击了乌克兰的军工企业，为乌军部队提供保障的能源、交通和仓储基础设施，远程无人机组 装点，以及乌军和外国雇佣兵临时驻扎点。 美国总统特使威特科夫和乌克兰谈判代表团团长、乌国家安全与国防委员会秘书乌梅 ...

俄乌局势，有新变化！ 据最新消息，乌克兰武装部队21日称，受俄军快速推进影响，乌军已从苏梅州的克拉斯诺皮利亚靠近俄乌边境 的多个阵地撤出。同日，俄罗斯国防部表示，俄军正向乌军防御纵深推进。 此外，美国和乌克兰方面21日称，双方代表团以及欧洲方面过去3天的一系列会谈"富有成效和建设性"。不 过，俄罗斯总统助理乌沙科夫表示，俄、美、乌代表举行三方会晤一事"尚未被认真讨论"。 值得注意的是，美国国家情报总监图尔茜·加巴德当地时间12月20日发文，指责北约以及欧盟试图将美国拖入 与俄罗斯的直接对抗。 最新进展：乌军撤出多个阵地 当地时间21日，乌克兰武装部队称，受俄军快速推进影响，乌军已从苏梅州的克拉斯诺皮利亚靠近俄乌边境的 多个阵地撤出。目前，乌军仍在边境地带持续开展行动，消灭俄军有生力量，当前俄军正遭受乌军火力打击。 俄罗斯国防部21日发布战报称，过去一天，俄军在各方向占据更有利防线和阵地，向乌军防御纵深推进。俄军 打击了乌克兰的军工企业，为乌军部队提供保障的能源、交通和仓储基础设施，远程无人机组装点，以及乌军 和外国雇佣兵临时驻扎点。 而在此前一天，即当地时间20日，俄罗斯国防部称，过去一天，俄军在苏梅和顿涅茨 ...

新华社北京12月8日电 美国白宫日前发布的国家安全战略报告尖锐批评欧洲，同时寻求与俄罗斯"重建 战略稳定"，一些方面的表述较往年报告有较明显调整。俄方对报告表示欢迎，俄罗斯总统新闻秘书佩 斯科夫在俄媒7日播出的采访中表示，美国政策调整"大体符合"俄方观点。 俄罗斯国家电视台7日播出这段采访。佩斯科夫说，本届美国政府与"先前几届政府存在根本不同"，"我 们看到了（政策）调整，与俄方观点大体相同"。路透社评论，近数十年来，俄美虽就一些议题展开合 作，但俄罗斯如此肯定美国政府发布的文件尚属首次。 都华盛顿拍摄的白宫。新华社记者胡友松摄 白宫4日发布的国家安全战略报告对欧洲措辞比较尖锐，警告称欧洲因移民政策、经济停滞、欧盟监管 过度等原因，面临"文明消亡的严峻前景"，而美国要"帮助欧洲纠正其当前的发展轨迹"以及"在欧洲各 国内部培养抵抗（当前发展轨迹）的力量"。在乌克兰问题上，报告把通过谈判迅速结束乌克兰危机称 为美国"核心利益"，称美国需要"与俄罗斯重建战略稳定"，指责欧盟阻挠美国结束乌克兰危机的努力。 就特朗普政府在报告中表示将阻止北约不断扩张，佩斯科夫称该内容"令人鼓舞"。不过，按照佩斯科夫 说法，鉴于美国内部 ...

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the significant expansion of executive power under Trump's second term, highlighting the challenges to the traditional checks and balances of the U.S. government and the implications for American governance and global order [4][10][25]. Group 1: Executive Power Expansion - Trump's administration has increasingly utilized executive orders to bypass legislative processes, exemplified by the renaming of the Department of Defense to the "Department of War" without Senate approval [4][8]. - The use of administrative appointments, such as the controversial appointment of Alina Habba as acting U.S. Attorney for New Jersey, illustrates the strategic maneuvering within the bureaucratic system to consolidate power [6][7][9]. - The Trump administration's approach to budget cuts, including the use of "pocket vetoes" to eliminate previously approved foreign aid, demonstrates a bold strategy to assert executive authority over congressional appropriations [9][10]. Group 2: Historical Context of Executive Power - The article traces the roots of executive power expansion back to the New Deal era under Franklin D. Roosevelt, where significant regulatory authority was shifted to the executive branch in response to the Great Depression [10][11]. - Historical precedents of executive overreach are cited, including actions taken by past presidents during wartime and crises, suggesting that Trump's actions are part of a broader historical trend rather than an isolated phenomenon [10][11][14]. Group 3: Political Implications - The article posits that Trump's challenge to the "deep state" reflects a broader ideological struggle within American politics, questioning the neutrality of government institutions and their alignment with specific political ideologies [14][15]. - The implications of Trump's policies, such as the introduction of the "Trump Golden Card" for wealthy immigrants, indicate a shift towards using state power as a tool for economic gain, diverging from traditional neoliberal principles [18][19]. - The potential for increased political polarization and the erosion of democratic norms is highlighted as a consequence of Trump's aggressive expansion of executive power [25][26].

Core Points - The article discusses the significant changes in the U.S. government structure under Trump's administration, particularly the renaming of the Department of Defense to the Department of War, reflecting a broader ideological shift [1] - It highlights the ongoing political battles between the Democratic and Republican parties, emphasizing the constitutional challenges posed by Trump's executive orders [2] - The article also examines Trump's strategic use of executive power to bypass traditional legislative processes, showcasing a trend of expanding executive authority [8][23] Group 1: Executive Power Expansion - Trump's administration has increasingly utilized executive orders to assert control, often bypassing legislative approval, as seen in the renaming of the Department of Defense [1][6] - The article notes that Trump's approach to executive orders has become more sophisticated, exploiting legal loopholes to challenge the traditional bureaucratic structure [3][6] - The use of "parallel nomenclature" to rename government departments illustrates a tactical maneuver to consolidate power without formal legislative changes [6] Group 2: Political and Legal Challenges - Trump's opponents have reacted strongly against his executive actions, with plans to challenge them in court, indicating a deepening partisan divide [2][4] - The article describes the legal battles surrounding the appointment of federal officials, highlighting the complexities and conflicts arising from Trump's appointments [4][5] - The ongoing struggle between the executive branch and the judiciary reflects broader concerns about the erosion of checks and balances in the U.S. political system [2][8] Group 3: Ideological Implications - The article argues that Trump's actions represent a challenge to the post-World War II ideological framework of the U.S. government, aiming to reshape its foundational principles [1][23] - It suggests that Trump's expansion of executive power is not unique but part of a historical trend among U.S. presidents, raising questions about the nature of governance and authority [8][15] - The concept of a "deep state" is explored, indicating a belief that entrenched bureaucratic interests oppose Trump's agenda, complicating his efforts to implement change [16][23] Group 4: Economic Policies and Globalization - Trump's recent policies, such as imposing high fees on H1B visa applications and introducing a "Trump Golden Card" for wealthy immigrants, reflect a shift in economic strategy towards leveraging foreign capital [17][18] - The article discusses how these policies aim to attract investment while simultaneously asserting national control over economic resources [17][19] - It highlights the tension between traditional neoliberal globalization and Trump's more nationalist economic approach, suggesting a potential reconfiguration of U.S. economic policy [17][19]

Core Viewpoint - An Israeli senior official, Tom Atim Alexandrovich, was arrested in the U.S. for alleged child sex trafficking but escaped back to Israel after posting bail, sparking outrage among American conservatives who demand accountability from the Trump administration for his release [1][3]. Group 1: Arrest and Charges - Alexandrovich was arrested during a police operation in Las Vegas while attending the 2025 Black Hat cybersecurity conference, facing charges of enticing a minor for sexual acts through online communication [3]. - He allegedly engaged in online chats with an undercover officer posing as a 15-year-old girl, discussing sexual contact, but claimed he believed the girl was 18 [3]. Group 2: Reactions and Political Implications - The incident has drawn significant criticism from conservative figures, including Republican Congresswoman Marjorie Taylor Greene, questioning why a foreign official accused of child sex crimes was allowed to leave the U.S. [4]. - Some voices have pointed fingers at the Nevada federal prosecutor, Seagal Chatach, suggesting that his Israeli heritage influenced the decision to release Alexandrovich [4]. - The Nevada District Attorney and a state court judge are criticized for not requiring Alexandrovich to surrender his passport, which enabled his escape [4]. Group 3: Government Response - The U.S. State Department clarified that Alexandrovich did not claim diplomatic immunity and was released by a state judge while awaiting court proceedings, denying any government intervention in his release [4]. - The incident has fueled conspiracy theories among some factions of the "MAGA" movement, linking it to broader narratives about Israeli influence in U.S. politics and the Epstein case [4].

Core Viewpoint - President Trump has filed a lawsuit against Rupert Murdoch and his media group, seeking $10 billion in damages due to the exposure of a nude drawing he sent in a birthday greeting to Jeffrey Epstein, a figure associated with high-profile sexual crimes [1] Group 1 - The lawsuit highlights the negative association of Epstein's name in the U.S., particularly among Trump's supporters who view it as linked to the "deep state" [1] - Trump's team has recently reversed its commitment to "thoroughly investigate the truth," leading to accusations of betrayal from his staunch supporters [1]

Group 1 - The Epstein case remains a central topic in American politics, aligning with right-wing conspiracy theories about globalists and moral decay, which Trump has effectively used to mobilize voters against the Democrats [3][4] - Trump's dismissal of the Epstein list as a non-issue has caused confusion among his supporters, raising doubts about his integrity and involvement in the case [4][8] - The demand for transparency in the Epstein case reflects a reasonable public sentiment, but the failure to deliver on this demand highlights the challenges faced by populism, which often simplifies complex issues into quick solutions [8][11] Group 2 - The complexity of the Epstein case, involving numerous powerful individuals, poses significant challenges for any investigation, questioning Trump's ability to deliver on his promises [10][11] - The existence of a "deep state" in the U.S. is acknowledged, but it is not as powerful as conspiracy theories suggest; rather, it is a product of long-standing policy inertia and interest group dynamics [13][14] - The emotional appeal of populism often leads to oversimplified solutions that fail to address the underlying complexities of governance, as seen in the reactions to the Epstein case [16][25] Group 3 - The role of right-wing political influencers in shaping narratives around the Epstein case demonstrates the fragmentation within the MAGA movement, as differing opinions create confusion among supporters [18][23] - The emotional response to the Epstein case reflects a broader societal struggle to comprehend complex political realities, leading to a reliance on simplistic moral dichotomies [22][29] - The challenges faced by the MAGA movement in addressing systemic issues highlight the limitations of relying solely on populist sentiments without engaging in deeper institutional reforms [30][31]