专题：北京公募基金高质量发展系列活动 新时代、新基金、新价值 这次改赎回费，对咱们普通投资者好处不少：能少点短期炒作，让大家更愿意长期拿着基金，不用总买 总卖亏手续费；基金里的钱也不会大起大落，基金经理能更专心搞长期投资，咱们赚钱的概率也更高。 对整个基金行业来说，销售机构会更用心做服务，行业环境会越来越好。 作者：新浪仓石基金 公募基金这些年一直在调整赎回费的规矩，其实就是为了把行业环境理顺，让公募基金能更好地发展， 最终也能帮到咱们普通投资者。 以前的时候，有些投资者把基金当成短线炒作的工具，买了没几天就卖，还有机构靠大资金量搞短期套 利。这样一来，基金正常的投资节奏被打乱了，咱们这些打算长期拿着基金的人，利益也受影响。所以 2017年证监会就定了规矩：除了货币基金和ETF之外，要是买基金持有还不到7天就赎回，得收不低于 1.5% 的赎回费，而且这钱全归到基金里，不让短期炒作的人随便捣乱。 后来基金行业规模越来越大，光靠限制短期套利，已经不够让行业好好发展了。之后监管层就出了个 《公募基金行业高质量发展行动方案》（简称《行动方案》），里面明明白白说要"保护长期投资者的 利益""让基金销售机构更愿意做好长期 ...

Core Insights - The U.S. Federal Reserve has implemented its first interest rate cut of the year, prompting investors to reevaluate their fixed income portfolios in light of potential future monetary policy changes [1] - Despite anticipated rate cuts, the bond market still presents attractive income opportunities, particularly as uncertainty around tariffs and geopolitical risks persists, making bonds a suitable option to mitigate equity market volatility [2] Market Commentary - With bond yields at historically attractive levels compared to low equity dividend yields, demand for bonds is expected to remain strong, potentially reshaping portfolio allocation strategies for the future [3] - The long-term impact of rate cuts on the return environment remains uncertain, emphasizing the importance of adaptability for long-term investors in a landscape of structurally higher rates [3] Active Management - Active ETFs have seen greater success than passive counterparts in new fund launches this year, highlighting the necessity of active management in the current market uncertainty [4] - Active fixed income funds are becoming increasingly competitive regarding expense ratios, with the Vanguard Core Bond ETF (VCRB) being a notable option due to its low 0.10% expense ratio [4] Fund Characteristics - The Vanguard Core Bond ETF (VCRB) utilizes the portfolio management expertise of the Vanguard Fixed Income Group, allowing for customized holdings based on market conditions [5] - To address credit risk in the current uncertain market, VCRB provides diversified exposure to the U.S. investment-grade bond market and expands its investment scope to include mortgage-backed and corporate securities, leveraging active management to seek yield opportunities [6]

Core Viewpoint - The Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF is positioned as an ideal long-term investment option, focusing on high-yielding dividend stocks that provide solid returns with lower volatility compared to the broader market [2][10][12] Fund Overview - The Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF aims to track the FTSE High Dividend Yield Index, which includes nearly 580 companies that pay high dividends [3] - The fund has a low expense ratio of 0.06%, costing investors approximately $0.60 annually for every $1,000 invested [4] Dividend Performance - The ETF currently offers a 2.5% dividend yield, significantly higher than the S&P 500's yield of less than 1.2% [5][6] - An investment of $1,000 in the ETF would generate about $25 in annual dividend income, compared to less than $12 from a similar investment in an S&P 500 index fund [6] Historical Context - Dividend-paying stocks have historically been strong wealth creators, with reinvested dividends significantly increasing investment value over time [7] - Since 1973, average dividend stocks in the S&P 500 have delivered a 9.2% annual total return with lower volatility, while non-dividend stocks have returned only 4.3% annually [8] Performance of High-Yield Stocks - Companies with higher dividend payout ratios tend to outperform the market over 60% of the time, indicating a correlation between higher yields and better long-term performance [9] - The Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF holds companies that have historically provided above-average returns with less volatility, making it a strong candidate for long-term investment [10]

Part of the rally in Latin America stock funds is currency-related. But another driver is that the stocks are exceptionally cheap. ...

Core Points - RiverNorth Opportunities Fund, Inc. announced the preliminary results of its transferable rights offering that expired on October 6, 2025 [1] - The Fund received subscription requests for 5,906,588 shares of common stock from rights holders [1] - The Fund expects to issue 5,906,588 new shares of common stock for these subscriptions, pending the receipt of payment [1]

Core Insights - As of the end of September, the total scale of ETFs exceeded 5.6 trillion yuan, with non-currency ETFs reaching 5.47 trillion yuan, marking an increase of 1.33 trillion yuan in the last three quarters, a growth rate of over 30% [1] - The number of billion-level ETFs increased to 117, with 36 new additions compared to the end of the second quarter [1] Group 1: Performance of Specific ETFs - The E Fund CSI Hong Kong Securities Investment Theme ETF saw the most significant growth, reaching 34.353 billion yuan by the end of September, more than doubling from 9.703 billion yuan at the end of June [3] - The newly established Sci-Tech Bond ETFs performed well, with 16 exceeding 10 billion yuan, accounting for nearly half of the new billion-level ETFs. The Harvest CSI AAA Technology Innovation Company Bond ETF led the growth with an increase of 21.079 billion yuan [3] - The Penghua CSI Subdivided Chemical Industry Theme ETF surged from 1.415 billion yuan at the end of June to 18.543 billion yuan by the end of September [3] Group 2: ETF Withdrawals and Trends - The Invesco Great Wall CSI A500 ETF and Tianhong CSI 300 ETF exited the billion-level category, shrinking by 4.39 billion yuan and 0.88 billion yuan, respectively [4] - Non-currency ETFs added 289.446 billion shares in the third quarter, while broad-based ETFs saw a reduction of 148.223 billion shares [4] - The Huaxia SSE Sci-Tech 50 ETF experienced the largest net redemption, totaling 31.118 billion yuan, leading to a decrease of 7.718 billion yuan in size [4] Group 3: Sector and Thematic ETFs - Industry theme ETFs became the main direction for capital inflow, with thematic index ETFs increasing by 131.851 billion shares and industry index ETFs rising by 84.415 billion shares in the third quarter [5] - The Huabao CSI All-Share Securities Company ETF had the highest net subscription, increasing by 37.934 billion shares, despite the overall broker sector only rising by 11% during the quarter [5] - The Fortune CSI Hong Kong Internet ETF saw a net subscription of 36.955 billion shares, with its scale doubling to 97.652 billion yuan, and the product's net value increased by over 20% during the period [5]

Core Insights - As market indexes approach all-time highs, investors may exercise caution in accumulating equities at current valuations, leading to a potential shift towards income funds as a hedge against equity market uncertainty [1] Group 1: Investment Strategy - Income funds are highlighted as a viable option for investors seeking stability amidst market volatility [1] - A hybrid investment strategy combining classic dividend growth stocks, Business Development Companies, REITs, and Closed End Funds is proposed to enhance investment income while achieving total returns comparable to traditional index funds [1] - The approach aims to balance growth and income, allowing investors to capture returns on par with the S&P 500 [1]

Core Insights - The market is experiencing a rally that, if sustained, will result in a third consecutive year of double-digit gains [1] Group 1 - The current market rally indicates strong performance, potentially leading to significant annual returns [1] - A historical reference is made to the Refco commodities debacle from 20 years ago, highlighting past market challenges [1]

Group 1 - The public fund industry experienced 306 executive changes in the first three quarters of 2025, involving 124 fund companies, including those with public fund licenses and securities asset management firms [1][3] - Compared to the same period last year, the total number of executive changes slightly decreased, but the number of companies involved increased by 122 [1][3] - The frequency of chairman changes was higher, with the number of chairman changes and the number of companies involved increasing by 34.55% and 23.33% year-on-year, respectively [1][3] - In contrast, the number of general manager changes and the number of companies involved decreased by 9.52% and 25.64% year-on-year, respectively [1][3]

To ensure this doesn’t happen in the future, please enable Javascript and cookies in your browser.If you have an ad-blocker enabled you may be blocked from proceeding. Please disable your ad-blocker and refresh. ...