Core Viewpoint - The State Council's Anti-Monopoly and Anti-Unfair Competition Committee Office has initiated an investigation and assessment of the market competition status in the food delivery platform service industry, highlighting concerns over unhealthy competition practices such as subsidies, price wars, and traffic control that negatively impact the real economy [1][2]. Group 1: Background and Considerations - The food delivery platform service industry is a significant component of China's platform economy, contributing to consumption, employment, and innovation [1]. - Recent issues in the industry, including aggressive competition tactics, have raised strong societal concerns and are seen as detrimental to fair market practices [1]. - The investigation aims to promote lawful and compliant operations within the food delivery platforms, fostering a market order characterized by quality and fair pricing [1]. Group 2: Investigation and Assessment Process - The investigation will involve on-site verification, face-to-face interviews, and surveys to gain a comprehensive understanding of competitive behaviors within the food delivery platforms [2]. - The committee will gather opinions from various stakeholders, including platform operators, new employment groups, and consumers, to conduct a thorough market competition analysis [2]. - Food delivery platforms are expected to cooperate with the investigation and adhere to anti-monopoly compliance responsibilities to mitigate monopoly risks and engage in fair competition [2].

来源：央视新闻 近日，国务院反垄断反不正当竞争委员会办公室依据《中华人民共和国反垄断法》，对外卖平台 服务行业市场竞争状况开展调查、评估。 国务院反垄断反不正当竞争委员会办公室有关负责同志答记者问 近日，国务院反垄断反不正当竞争委员会办公室对外卖平台服务行业市场竞争状况开展调查、评 估。对此，国务院反垄断反不正当竞争委员会办公室有关负责同志答记者问。 问：请介绍一下国务院反垄断反不正当竞争委员会办公室宣布对外卖平台服务行业开展市场竞争 状况调查评估的相关背景和主要考虑？ 答： 党中央、国务院高度重视平台经济创新和健康发展。外卖平台服务行业作为我国平台经济的 重要组成部分，在促进消费、扩大就业、推动创新等方面发挥了重要作用。但近段时间以来，外 卖平台服务行业拼补贴、拼价格、控流量等问题突出，挤压实体经济，加剧行业"内卷式"竞争， 社会各方面反映强烈。为推动外卖平台依法合规经营、公平有序竞争，形成优质优价、良性竞争 的市场秩序，国务院反垄断反不正当竞争委员会办公室（以下简称委员会办公室）依据《中华人 民共和国反垄断法》规定，决定对外卖平台服务行业市场竞争状况开展调查、评估。 本次调查评估是委员会办公室表达竞争关注 ...

风险提示及免责条款 市场有风险，投资需谨慎。本文不构成个人投资建议，也未考虑到个别用户特殊的投资目标、财务状况或需要。用户应考虑本文中的任何 意见、观点或结论是否符合其特定状况。据此投资，责任自负。 答：党中央、国务院高度重视平台经济创新和健康发展。外卖平台服务行业作为我国平台经济的重要组 成部分，在促进消费、扩大就业、推动创新等方面发挥了重要作用。但近段时间以来，外卖平台服务行 业拼补贴、拼价格、控流量等问题突出，挤压实体经济，加剧行业"内卷式"竞争，社会各方面反映强 烈。为推动外卖平台依法合规经营、公平有序竞争，形成优质优价、良性竞争的市场秩序，国务院反垄 断反不正当竞争委员会办公室（以下简称委员会办公室）依据《中华人民共和国反垄断法》规定，决定 对外卖平台服务行业市场竞争状况开展调查、评估。 本次调查评估是委员会办公室表达竞争关注、评估垄断风险、规范市场秩序的重要举措，将通过现场核 实、当面访谈、问卷调查等方式，深入了解外卖平台竞争行为，广泛听取平台内经营者、新就业群体、 消费者等各方意见，全面调查市场竞争状况，组织开展分析论证，传导监管压力，提出处置措施。外卖 平台要积极配合市场调查、评估工作，严格落 ...

对此，国务院反垄断反不正当竞争委员会办公室有关负责同志答记者问。 校对|何小桃 问：请介绍一下国务院反垄断反不正当竞争委员会办公室宣布对外卖平台服务行业开展市场竞争状况调查评估的相关背景和主要考虑？ 每日经济新闻综合自央视新闻 答：党中央、国务院高度重视平台经济创新和健康发展。外卖平台服务行业作为我国平台经济的重要组成部分，在促进消费、扩大就业、推动创新等方面 发挥了重要作用。但近段时间以来，外卖平台服务行业拼补贴、拼价格、控流量等问题突出，挤压实体经济，加剧行业"内卷式"竞争，社会各方面反映强 烈。为推动外卖平台依法合规经营、公平有序竞争，形成优质优价、良性竞争的市场秩序，国务院反垄断反不正当竞争委员会办公室（以下简称委员会办 公室）依据《中华人民共和国反垄断法》规定，决定对外卖平台服务行业市场竞争状况开展调查、评估。 每经编辑｜段炼 本次调查评估是委员会办公室表达竞争关注、评估垄断风险、规范市场秩序的重要举措，将通过现场核实、当面访谈、问卷调查等方式，深入了解外卖平 台竞争行为，广泛听取平台内经营者、新就业群体、消费者等各方意见，全面调查市场竞争状况，组织开展分析论证，传导监管压力，提出处置措施。外 卖平 ...

近日，国务院反垄断反不正当竞争委员会办公室对外卖平台服务行业市场竞争状况开展调 查、评估。对此，国务院反垄断反不正当竞争委员会办公室有关负责同志答记者问。 问：请介绍一下国务院反垄断反不正当竞争委员会办公室宣布对外卖平台服务行业开展市场 竞争状况调查评估的相关背景和主要考虑？ 答：党中央、国务院高度重视平台经济创新和健康发展。外卖平台服务行业作为我国平台经 济的重要组成部分，在促进消费、扩大就业、推动创新等方面发挥了重要作用。 但近段时间 以来，外卖平台服务行业拼补贴、拼价格、控流量等问题突出，挤压实体经济，加剧行业"内 卷式"竞争，社会各方面反映强烈。 为推动外卖平台依法合规经营、公平有序竞争，形成优质 优价、良性竞争的市场秩序，国务院反垄断反不正当竞争委员会办公室（以下简称委员会办 公室）依据《中华人民共和国反垄断法》规定，决定对外卖平台服务行业市场竞争状况开展 调查、评估。 本次调查评估是委员会办公室表达竞争关注、评估垄断风险、规范市场秩序的重要举措， 将 通过现场核实、当面访谈、问卷调查等方式，深入了解外卖平台竞争行为，广泛听取平台内 经营者、新就业群体、消费者等各方意见，全面调查市场竞争状况，组织开 ...

Core Viewpoint - The State Council's Anti-Monopoly and Anti-Unfair Competition Committee Office has initiated an investigation and assessment of the market competition status in the food delivery platform service industry, aiming to address issues of competition and potential monopoly risks [1][3]. Group 1: Background and Considerations - The central government places significant emphasis on the innovation and healthy development of the platform economy, with food delivery platforms being a crucial part of this sector, contributing to consumption, employment, and innovation [3]. - Recent issues in the food delivery service industry, such as aggressive subsidies, price wars, and traffic control, have led to negative impacts on the real economy and intensified "involution" competition, prompting strong feedback from various sectors of society [3]. Group 2: Investigation and Assessment Details - The investigation will utilize methods such as on-site verification, face-to-face interviews, and surveys to gain a comprehensive understanding of competitive behaviors within food delivery platforms [4]. - The committee aims to gather opinions from various stakeholders, including platform operators, new employment groups, and consumers, to conduct thorough market competition analysis and propose regulatory measures [4]. - Food delivery platforms are required to actively cooperate with the market investigation and assessment, ensuring compliance with anti-monopoly responsibilities and promoting fair competition to foster innovation and healthy development in the industry [4].

问：请介绍一下国务院反垄断反不正当竞争委员会办公室宣布对外卖平台服务行业开展市场竞 争状况调查评估的相关背景和主要考虑？ 近日， 国务院反垄断反不正当竞争委员会办公室对外卖平台服务行业市场竞争状况开展调 查、评估。 对此，国务院反垄断反不正当竞争委员会办公室有关负责同志答记者问。 SFC 来源丨央视新闻 编辑 | 黎雨桐 见习编辑林芊蔚 答：党中央、国务院高度重视平台经济创新和健康发展。外卖平台服务行业作为我国平台经济 的重要组成部分，在促进消费、扩大就业、推动创新等方面发挥了重要作用。但近段时间以 来，外卖平台服务行业拼补贴、拼价格、控流量等问题突出，挤压实体经济，加剧行业"内卷 式"竞争，社会各方面反映强烈。为推动外卖平台依法合规经营、公平有序竞争，形成优质优 价、良性竞争的市场秩序，国务院反垄断反不正当竞争委员会办公室（以下简称委员会办公 室）依据《中华人民共和国反垄断法》规定，决定对外卖平台服务行业市场竞争状况开展调 查、评估。 本次调查评估是委员会办公室表达竞争关注、评估垄断风险、规范市场秩序的重要举措，将通 过现场核实、当面访谈、问卷调查等方式，深入了解外卖平台竞争行为，广泛听取平台内经营 者、新 ...

Core Viewpoint - The new national standard for food delivery platforms, while not legally binding, aims to establish industry benchmarks, balance interests, and significantly impact the operational behaviors of platform companies, providing essential references for regulatory enforcement [1][9]. Group 1: Service Management System - The new standard constructs a comprehensive service management system covering the entire process of food delivery platforms [2]. Group 2: Merchant Management - The standard establishes a "registration-audit-operation" regulatory framework to address long-standing food safety issues, requiring merchants to have physical stores and valid licenses, including a unique video verification process to combat "ghost kitchens" [3]. - A dual audit mechanism is introduced, mandating monthly checks of at least 5% of merchants and updating information for high-risk merchants within three months [3]. - Platforms must set up independent food safety management bodies and implement a systematic food safety oversight protocol [4]. Group 3: Pricing and Promotion Regulations - The standard addresses long-standing issues of pricing transparency and promotional practices, defining core fees and requiring platforms to publicly disclose pricing rules and calculations [5]. - It prohibits various unreasonable charging practices and mandates a fee reduction mechanism for small and micro merchants [5]. - The standard delineates responsibilities for platform promotions, ensuring costs are not passed onto merchants or delivery personnel, and prohibits deceptive pricing practices [5]. Group 4: Delivery Personnel Rights - The new standard includes specific provisions for the protection of delivery personnel's rights, ensuring fair compensation and working conditions [6][7]. - It mandates that platforms determine base delivery income based on regional characteristics and prohibits practices that reduce earnings under the guise of promotions [7]. - Delivery personnel are limited to a maximum of 8 hours of work per day, with mandatory breaks, and platforms must optimize delivery algorithms to ensure safety [7][8]. Group 5: Platform Responsibility and Algorithm Transparency - The standard emphasizes the need for platforms to enhance algorithm transparency, requiring public disclosure of dispatch algorithms and compliance audits [10][11]. - It aims to prevent monopolistic behaviors by ensuring platforms do not exploit their advantages to discriminate against consumers [10]. Group 6: Balancing Rights and Interests - The standard introduces a dual-track protection approach for delivery personnel, recognizing both labor and cooperative employment models to better meet the needs of flexible workers [12][13]. - It establishes a "quasi-injury" insurance system for gig workers, which may become a key indicator of platform compliance [13]. - The implementation of the standard may lead to increased operational costs for platforms, affecting rider income and delivery times, necessitating ongoing evaluation and adjustment of the standard's effectiveness [14].