（来源：工人日报） 据海南省司法厅相关负责人介绍，该省在全国率先实现"一级政府只设立一个行政复议机关"，行政机关 负责人出庭应诉率从2021年的34.24%提升至2025年的100%。海南还在全省范围内完成市县"一支队伍管 执法"综合行政执法改革，改变以往多头执法、执法力量"小散弱"和各自为政的局面。 海南还实现全省专职人民调解员和村（居）法律顾问全覆盖，共设立人民调解组织3769个，配备专兼职 人民调解员21615名，聘请村（居）法律顾问1103名，五年来共受理调解案件14.2万件，调解成功率 94%。行政复议化解行政争议的主渠道作用持续增强，五年来共办理行政复议案件1.5万余件，2024年 新修订的行政复议法实施以来新收案件近1万件，八成以上实现案结事了。 本报讯（记者赖书闻）12月25日，记者从海南省政府获悉，海南作为全国5个国际商事仲裁中心建设试 点地区之一，已受理商事纠纷25980件，成功调解7089件，争议总标的额约187亿元，正逐步成为面向全 球的国际商事纠纷解决优选地。 ...

在民生法治保障方面，我省聚焦民生热点，推动制修订医疗医保医药失信惩戒若干规定等多部民生 领域法规规章。开展提升行政执法质量三年行动，构建覆盖省、市、县、乡四级行政执法协调监督体 系，推动全省综合行政执法平台全面运行。今年3月启动规范涉企行政执法专项行动以来，已整治问题 1252个，为企业挽回经济损失约5058万元，切实维护了人民群众合法权益。 在公共法律服务体系构建方面，我省持续推动公共法律服务行业规范化发展，5年共受理仲裁案件 11893件、司法鉴定案件128473件、公证事项482752件，同比分别增长5%、94.5%、217.9%。办理法律 援助案件101344件，为人民群众挽回经济损失8.42亿元。全省公共法律服务实体、网络、热线三大平台 累计提供法律咨询服务335.57万人次，群众满意度稳定在97%以上，基本建成覆盖城乡、便捷高效、均 等普惠的现代公共法律服务体系。 在维护社会安全稳定方面，我省统筹推进教育改造、社区矫正、安置帮教、纠纷化解和法治宣传， 全省监狱连续23年未发生重大监管案事件，连续29年实现生产安全;戒毒场所连续14年未发生重大监管 案事件，连续30年实现生产安全;罪犯和戒毒人员教育 ...

打造海南自贸港国际商事纠纷解决优选地 海南法院加强自贸港涉外司法服务保障 今年7月，海南省一中院海南自由贸易港第一国际商事法庭充分发挥涉外审判"立审执"一体化的制 度优势，成功化解一起逾1.7亿元的涉外金融借款合同纠纷案，保障了借款方项目资金的持续供给， 使"保交楼"项目建设按节点如期推进。在立案仅一个多月后，当事双方便达成调解协议。 "聚焦封关运作的法治需求，重点构建了'立、审、执'一体化、国际商事纠纷'诉、调、裁'三位一体 多元化解、'一站式'涉外诉讼服务等创新机制，切实发挥司法监督支持仲裁作用，营造'仲裁友好型'司 法环境，为涉外、涉港澳台民商事案件当事人提供公正、高效、专业的涉外司法服务和多元、便捷的跨 境纠纷解决路径，努力打造国际商事纠纷解决优选地。"海南省一中院海南自由贸易港第一国际商事法 庭有关负责人说。 省高级人民法院党组副书记、副院长陈文平表示，打造国际商事纠纷解决优选地，对海南自贸港而 言意义重大。海南法院将进一步树立正确涉外审判司法理念，完善国际商事纠纷解决机制，加强涉外审 判队伍专业化建设，以更实举措、更优服务，努力打造与海南自贸港建设相适应的涉外审判体系，持续 提升自贸港司法国际公信 ...

Core Viewpoint - The Supreme People's Court has issued opinions to enhance the construction of international commercial courts, aiming to improve the quality and efficiency of foreign-related commercial trials, thereby supporting high-level opening-up and the Belt and Road Initiative [1][2] Group 1: Development of International Commercial Courts - The establishment of international commercial courts in Shenzhen and Xi'an in 2018 marked a significant step, followed by 16 intermediate people's courts in cities like Suzhou, Beijing, and Shanghai since 2020 [1] - These courts aim to create a new mechanism for resolving international commercial disputes and provide high-quality legal services to both domestic and foreign parties [1] Group 2: Legal Environment and Judicial Efficiency - A law-based business environment is essential for foreign investment, focusing on equal protection of the legal rights of both domestic and foreign parties [1] - There is a need to enhance the effectiveness of foreign-related judicial processes by improving jurisdiction mechanisms and case management systems [1][2] Group 3: Multi-faceted Dispute Resolution Mechanisms - The complexity and high costs of cross-border litigation necessitate the establishment of more efficient dispute resolution mechanisms, including video witnessing and standardized case management [2] - The diversity in legal systems and cultures among international commercial participants requires the development of a robust dispute resolution service framework [2] Group 4: Legal Guidance and Standardization - The Supreme People's Court's opinions aim to provide legal guidance and risk alerts for foreign-related enterprises, facilitating the selection of dispute resolution methods [2] - Standardization of commonly used judicial documents and litigation procedures in English is also emphasized to enhance accessibility for international participants [2]

Core Viewpoint - The Supreme People's Court has issued opinions to enhance the construction of international commercial courts, aiming to improve the quality and efficiency of foreign-related commercial trials, thereby supporting high-level opening-up and the Belt and Road Initiative [1][2]. Group 1: Development of International Commercial Courts - The establishment of international commercial courts in Shenzhen and Xi'an in 2018 marked the beginning of a new phase in foreign-related judicial trials in China [1]. - Since 2020, 16 intermediate people's courts in cities such as Suzhou, Beijing, Chengdu, Xiamen, Shanghai, and Chongqing have set up international commercial courts, creating a new mechanism for resolving international commercial disputes [1]. - These courts aim to provide high-quality legal services and establish a "one-stop" dispute resolution center for both domestic and foreign parties [1]. Group 2: Legal Environment and Judicial Efficiency - A law-based business environment is essential for foreign trade, and the focus of foreign-related judicial construction is on equal protection of the legitimate rights and interests of both domestic and foreign parties [1]. - To adapt to the new trends of expanding opening-up, there is a need to enhance the efficiency of foreign-related judicial processes within the legal framework [1]. - Innovations in jurisdiction mechanisms, case management, and the application of international treaties and practices are proposed to facilitate smoother dispute resolution and more efficient litigation services [1][2]. Group 3: Multi-faceted Dispute Resolution Mechanisms - The complexity and high costs of cross-border litigation necessitate the establishment of more efficient dispute resolution mechanisms [2]. - Courts are adopting measures such as video witnessing to improve the efficiency of evidence transfer and authorization processes [2]. - A comprehensive service guarantee mechanism for dispute resolution is being developed, including the judicial confirmation of international commercial mediation agreements [2]. Group 4: Legal Guidance and Standardization - The Supreme People's Court's opinions aim to provide legal guidance and risk alerts for foreign parties and enterprises venturing abroad [2]. - Standardized model clauses for jurisdiction in foreign-related agreements are being developed to facilitate dispute resolution choices for parties involved [2]. - The initiative seeks to create a fair, efficient, and distinctive international commercial dispute resolution framework, reinforcing the legal foundation for opening-up [2].

Group 1 - The Supreme People's Court issued guidelines to implement the Private Economy Promotion Law, focusing on the judicial protection of data property rights and the resolution of data rights disputes to promote efficient circulation and trading of data elements [1][2] - The guidelines emphasize the need to correct disproportionate administrative penalties against private economic organizations and strengthen judicial efforts against monopolistic and unfair competition practices [2][3] - The guidelines aim to address issues related to overdue payments to private economic organizations, particularly small and medium-sized enterprises, ensuring timely payment of debts [2][3] Group 2 - The guidelines propose measures to combat internal corruption within private economic organizations, including the issuance of guiding cases and promoting legal awareness [3][4] - The guidelines call for the establishment of a one-stop international commercial dispute resolution mechanism to facilitate cross-border commercial mediation, supporting private economic organizations in participating in the Belt and Road Initiative [3][4] - The guidelines stress the importance of judicial protection of property rights and the need to rectify wrongful cases involving enterprises, ensuring strict adherence to legal procedures [4]