Workflow
固废处置
icon
Search documents
绿色金融成为高质量发展的“金钥匙”
Xin Lang Cai Jing· 2026-01-12 00:26
登录新浪财经APP 搜索【信披】查看更多考评等级 (来源:邯郸日报) 河北清峰绿能固废处置有限公司财务部长黄凯贺介绍说,目前该项目已由建设银行牵头组建银团贷款,总计审批金额达40亿元,其中已发放10 亿元专项贷款,有力支持了项目建设,切实解决了企业在发展过程中的资金需求。同时,碳排放权抵质押贷款等创新金融产品也将企业的环保 效益直接转化为经济收益,助力公司加速延伸循环经济产业链,扩大固废处置与绿色建材生产规模,在提升经济效益的同时进一步巩固"无废 企业"的竞争优势。 清峰绿能的发展实践,正是邯郸绿色金融创新赋能产业转型的缩影。去年以来,邯郸锚定传统产业绿色化改造和绿色产业培育两大核心方向, 积极探索绿色金融助力城市转型新路径,2025年9月出台的《创建绿色金融城市行动方案》,成为全省首个制定系统性创建绿色金融城市行动 方案的城市。 转自:邯郸日报 邯郸新闻传媒中心记者 工业固废变废为宝,传统钢铁绿色升级……作为全省首个制定系统性创建绿色金融城市行动方案的城市,邯郸以绿色金融创新为牵引,撬动金 融资源向绿色低碳领域聚集,为城市转型发展注入强劲动能。 在武安工业园区的河北清峰绿能固废处置有限公司,记者看到,钢渣、 ...
山东省海阳市市场监管局发布2025年计量“双随机、一公开”抽查结果(标准计量科)
Core Points - The Haiyang Market Supervision Administration has published the results of the 2025 measurement "double random, one open" inspection, highlighting compliance and issues found during the inspections [2][3] Group 1: Company Compliance - Haiyang Yongneng Biotechnology Co., Ltd. and Hanlan (Haiyang) Solid Waste Disposal Co., Ltd. both had issues identified during energy measurement supervision checks, but these issues have been rectified [2] - Yantai Jin'ao Environmental Technology Co., Ltd. also had issues found during the energy measurement supervision check, which have been resolved [2] - Several companies, including Haiyang Sanlian Home Appliance Co., Ltd. and Haiyang Jingyi Optical Store, reported no issues during their respective measurement checks [2][3] Group 2: Measurement Checks - The inspection covered various sectors, including energy measurement, water efficiency labeling, and legal measurement unit usage [2][3] - Notable companies such as China Petroleum and Sinopec had no issues reported during the inspections of their fuel dispensers [2][3] - The inspections also included checks on medical measurement instruments at Haiyang Xin'an Central Hospital, which reported no issues [3]
海诺尔三次冲刺IPO未果收罚单,保荐机构申万宏源遭警示
Nan Fang Du Shi Bao· 2025-04-25 02:27
Core Points - The Shenzhen Stock Exchange has issued three penalties related to the IPO application of Hainuoer, involving multiple violations by the company and its associated institutions [1][3][6] - Hainuoer has attempted to apply for an IPO three times, but each attempt was hindered by regulatory issues and penalties [4][5] Group 1: Company Violations - Hainuoer was found to have inadequate internal controls regarding R&D expenditures and improper accounting treatment of R&D costs [3][6] - The actual controller and chairman of Hainuoer, Luo Yili, along with the financial officer, were criticized for failing to act with integrity [3][6] - Hainuoer has a history of environmental law violations and issues with project management, which have led to multiple failed IPO attempts [4][5] Group 2: Regulatory Actions - The Shenzhen Stock Exchange has taken disciplinary actions against Hainuoer, including a public reprimand and a requirement for the chairman to attend a meeting [3][6] - The underwriting institution, Shenwan Hongyuan, and its associated accountants also received warnings for failing to conduct thorough due diligence [6][8] - Shenwan Hongyuan has faced multiple regulatory penalties in 2024, indicating ongoing issues with compliance in its underwriting practices [8][9]
申万宏源再遭约谈!去年曾四收警示函
21世纪经济报道· 2025-04-24 08:21
Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the regulatory scrutiny faced by Shenwan Hongyuan Securities in relation to the IPO project of Hainuoer Environmental Industry Co., Ltd., highlighting issues with internal controls over R&D expenditures and previous regulatory penalties faced by the company [1][4][10]. Group 1: Regulatory Actions - The Shenzhen Stock Exchange announced self-regulatory measures against Shenwan Hongyuan Securities and its representatives due to issues in the Hainuoer IPO project, including inadequate internal controls over R&D expenditures [1][4]. - Hainuoer has faced multiple regulatory actions, including three failed IPO attempts, with the latest being the withdrawal of its application in July 2024 [6][7]. Group 2: R&D Expenditure Issues - Hainuoer's reported R&D expenditures from 2020 to the first half of 2023 were 3.60 million, 9.33 million, 10.23 million, and 4.24 million, representing 2.57%, 3.79%, 4.06% of its revenue respectively, indicating a trend of increasing R&D investment [5]. - The Shenzhen Stock Exchange found discrepancies in Hainuoer's disclosures regarding R&D expenses, including issues with the classification and accounting of these costs [4][8]. Group 3: Shenwan Hongyuan's Past Penalties - Shenwan Hongyuan has previously received multiple warnings and penalties related to its sponsorship duties, particularly concerning R&D expenditure issues in other IPO projects [10][15]. - The company was criticized for failing to adequately verify the accuracy of R&D personnel and expenditures in its past projects, leading to regulatory actions [12][13].
再度踩坑“研发投入”! 申万宏源承销保荐又遭约谈 去年曾四收警示函
Core Viewpoint - The regulatory scrutiny on Shenwan Hongyuan's underwriting practices has intensified, particularly concerning the IPO project of Hainuo Environmental Industry Co., Ltd, highlighting issues related to internal controls over R&D expenditures and previous warnings received by the company [1][5][6]. Group 1: Regulatory Actions - The Shenzhen Stock Exchange has taken self-regulatory measures against Shenwan Hongyuan Securities and its representatives due to inadequate oversight in the Hainuo IPO project [1][5]. - Hainuo's application for an IPO was previously questioned by the Shenzhen Stock Exchange regarding the composition and accounting of R&D expenses, indicating ongoing concerns about financial disclosures [2][3]. Group 2: Financial Performance - Hainuo's R&D expenses from 2020 to the first half of 2023 were reported as 3.60 million, 9.34 million, 10.23 million, and 4.24 million yuan, representing 2.57%, 3.79%, 4.06% of its revenue respectively, showing a trend of increasing R&D investment [2]. - The company has faced challenges in its IPO attempts, having previously failed twice before this current attempt [4]. Group 3: Previous Violations - Shenwan Hongyuan has a history of regulatory penalties related to its underwriting practices, particularly concerning R&D investment issues, indicating a pattern of compliance failures [5][7]. - The company has been criticized for not adequately verifying the accuracy of R&D personnel and expenditures in previous IPO applications, leading to significant discrepancies in reported figures [7][8].