"基金强，则资金聚，投资强，则产业兴。"近年来，苏州市找准了资本与产业相互成就的切入点， 持续优化创投生态，吸引资本"活水"汇聚，着力打造百亿并购基金、千亿产业基金和万亿科创基金，构 建起了多方联动的"基金矩阵"。 截至今年6月末，苏州共有中基协登记私募基金管理人431家，备案私募基金2979只，基金认缴总规 模突破1万亿元人民币，均列全省第一。 "两条腿走路"，这是苏州产业资本生态建设中的选择。一方面，苏州股权投资行业的发展需要集聚 更多优质资本，从载体平台建设，到开辟绿色通道、市场化招引私募基金，为苏州股权投资产业的发展 和优质资本的集聚创造了积极条件；另一方面，打通项目资本良性循环渠道，完善基金多元化退出机 制，推动股权投资基金与我市主导产业企业、新型研发机构孵化企业的高效对接，不仅是股权投资产业 本身发展的需要，更是苏州打造"产业+"创投生态的终极指向。 AIC基金带来更多"耐心"资本 来自清科研究中心的数据显示，仅去年一年间，苏州就新募集基金192只，数量居全国第二；募资 金额超600亿元，发生投资案例数784起、投资金额366.87亿元，均列全国第四。 产业高地吸引资金集聚 创投热度持续攀升的背后 ...

Core Points - The report by researchers from the University of Melbourne accuses Chinese manufacturers of dominating the construction of underwater infrastructure, posing a threat to its safety [1][3] - The report suggests that countries in the Indo-Pacific region should enhance the resilience of underwater infrastructure and collaborate on data security through the "Quad" security dialogue mechanism [1][3] Group 1: Underwater Infrastructure and Resilience - The concept of "resilience" in underwater infrastructure primarily refers to strengthening the resilience of submarine cables to prevent secondary or tertiary impacts from cable damage [4] - Historical examples, such as the UK's "All-Red Line" policy in 1901, illustrate the importance of protecting underwater cables for national strategic and commercial interests [5] - The International Telecommunication Union (ITU) and the International Cable Protection Committee (ICPC) are set to establish a consulting body for submarine cable resilience by December 2024 [5] Group 2: Western Criticism and "Gray Zone Tactics" - Western think tanks have consistently criticized China's deep-sea activities, often labeling them as having malicious intent, linking them to potential damage to underwater infrastructure [3][6] - The term "gray zone tactics" refers to coercive activities that fall between peace and armed conflict, including the destruction of underwater cables and pipelines [7][9] - Recent incidents involving underwater cable disruptions have been attributed to Chinese vessels, despite investigations indicating these were accidental events [10][11] Group 3: International Cooperation and Non-State Entities - The protection of underwater infrastructure is primarily the responsibility of state actors, yet non-state entities, such as private companies, play a significant role in cable laying and investment [14][15] - The International Cable Protection Committee serves as a platform for dialogue between government and non-state entities, although many key national government agencies are not members [17][19] - The United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea outlines the rights of countries to lay submarine cables, but the enforcement of these rights often lacks clarity regarding non-state actors [12][16] Group 4: China's Role and Legal Framework - China has stringent laws against the destruction of underwater cables, with penalties significantly harsher than those in other countries [11] - The international legal framework primarily addresses state responsibilities, leaving gaps in accountability for non-state actors involved in cable damage [16] - The article emphasizes the need for a collaborative approach to underwater infrastructure protection, advocating for consensus among nations and non-state entities [20]